Started By
Message
re: What if: Cam vs Ingram for the Heisman
Posted on 12/6/10 at 9:54 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Posted on 12/6/10 at 9:54 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
Ingram might not have even got invited to NY this year.
1
Posted on 12/6/10 at 9:57 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
Wasn't last year the closest vote ever? Figured suh wrapped it up against tejas
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:00 pm to PuntBamaPunt
Yeah, it was. I do not know how Ingram was even invited to NY last year to be honest. He was not even a top 3 RB in the country. Hell, not even the best in the state of alabama.
We will see where he ends up getting drafted. I do not think it will even be first round, but that will partly depend on how he does in the combines.
We will see where he ends up getting drafted. I do not think it will even be first round, but that will partly depend on how he does in the combines.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:03 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
You're a fricking tard.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:03 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
I do not know how Ingram was even invited to NY last year to be honest. He was not even a top 3 RB in the country. Hell, not even the best in the state of alabama.
You are so frickin' stupid...
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:05 pm to DvlsAdvocat
Mark Ingram was honestly one of the weakest Heisman winners in recent history and the vote last year proved it. Cam would win and it wouldn't be close.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:05 pm to FTBLFN
I'm not trying to be an arse at all but objectively looking at it Ingram is considered one of the weaker Heisman winners in history. Cam is arguably the strongest. Also it's pretty ironic that Ingram's dad is a felon but Cam's dad is reason enough to make you bring this topic up.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:05 pm to tdauburn
quote:They barely beat a Jonathan Crompton lead team. That doesn't mean the 2006 Vols would kick their arse.
They barely beat the Chris Todd led team
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:05 pm to FTBLFN
Ingram is probably the worst heisman winner in SEC history. He was not even the 3rd best player on his own team. Or the most valuable. Rolo and Julio were better and Cody was more valuable though not better.
Hell, like I said, no way he should have been invited to NY. You put him on an average team, he is not even all SEC. You put him on AU's team last year, he is 2nd string behind Tate.
Hell, like I said, no way he should have been invited to NY. You put him on an average team, he is not even all SEC. You put him on AU's team last year, he is 2nd string behind Tate.
This post was edited on 12/6/10 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:07 pm to AUTigLN11
quote:
I'm not trying to be an arse at all but objectively looking at it Ingram is considered one of the weaker Heisman winners in history. Cam is arguably the strongest. Also it's pretty ironic that Ingram's dad is a felon but Cam's dad is reason enough to make you bring this topic up.
There have been at least 3 worse players to win over the past decade than Mark Ingram.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:08 pm to UASports23
quote:
Last year's SEC Defenses > This year's SEC defenses
That's because they didn't have to face Cam to inflate their numbers. Alabama is actually one of the only team whose defense was better last year anyway. God you guys are so pathetic.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:16 pm to FTBLFN
quote:
It should also be noted that the 2009 Bama team would have undoubtedly beaten the 2010 auburn team.
2009 Alabama almost lost to 2009 Auburn
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:18 pm to UltraSwagnus
quote:
2009 Alabama almost lost to 2009 Auburn
2010 Auburn almost about 7 games. I'd hate to see them in a year where the other teams are all slightly better.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:20 pm to ohiovol
quote:
I'd hate to see them in a year where the other teams are all slightly better.
Good luck. The SEC West this year was the best division in college football history. Nice try though.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:21 pm to ohiovol
quote:
There have been at least 3 worse players to win over the past decade than Mark Ingram.
Who, based on the season they had when they won it? Obviously guys like Jason White suck but you can't really argue with their numbers or results even if it was system based.
This post was edited on 12/6/10 at 10:22 pm
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:32 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
I'm sorry, but Ingram can't hold Newton's jock strap. Ingram is going to be the first Heisman winner from the year before to not to a single vote the next year.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:38 pm to AUTigLN11
quote:Ridiculous.You can't just look at the record of a few teams and determine that.
Good luck. The SEC West this year was the best division in college football history. Nice try though.
This post was edited on 12/6/10 at 10:41 pm
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:39 pm to AUfan87
quote:
You are so frickin' stupid...
EASY now. Don't have a heart attack.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:39 pm to AUTigLN11
Eric Crouch essentially stole it
Carson Palmer was crap for about half his year, lit up some shite defense, and won because he destroyed Notre Dame
And yes, I was including White. He sucked.
Carson Palmer was crap for about half his year, lit up some shite defense, and won because he destroyed Notre Dame
And yes, I was including White. He sucked.
Posted on 12/6/10 at 10:42 pm to ohiovol
quote:
Ridiculous. The defenses across the board were nothing special.
UGA 10 > UGA 09
Ark 10 > Ark 09
LSU 10 > LSU 09
MSU 10 > MSU 09
AU 10 > AU 09
UT 10 > UT 09
USC 10 > USC 09
Clemson is also pretty good defensively.
Bama and Ole Miss are the only SEC teams that are worse than last year.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News