Started By
Message
Demise of football Dynasties
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:44 pm
Alabama, Georgia, Notre Dame, etc. get ready for (wait for it) PARITY.
Yes, assuming the ncaa continues (no assurance) the implementation of revised/revising transfer rules and NIL have totally changed the concept of football dynasties.
Parity rules and I envision in the near term games where Georgia loses to Vanderbilt and Alabama loses to Middle Tenn State.
Too much money involved and too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
Don’t cry for me Argentina, make that Georgia!
Yes, assuming the ncaa continues (no assurance) the implementation of revised/revising transfer rules and NIL have totally changed the concept of football dynasties.
Parity rules and I envision in the near term games where Georgia loses to Vanderbilt and Alabama loses to Middle Tenn State.
Too much money involved and too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
Don’t cry for me Argentina, make that Georgia!
19
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:46 pm to AP77
quote:
Demise of football Dynasties
quote:
Alabama
okay
quote:
Georgia
yep
quote:
Notre Dame
what the frick
This post was edited on 10/4/23 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:46 pm to AP77
aggy will be first in line to push them out.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 3:52 pm to AP77
Rebuilds are going to be a lot quicker too. You don't have to stack multiple recruiting classes to get back to being competitive. Just have to poach other teams' players to fill needed gaps.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 4:00 pm to AP77
The exact opposite is true.
If Vandy and Middle Tennessee St had a late bloomer/under the radar stud.. the elites would snatch them up. The elites have another thing in common, a huge following that will feed their favorite program to keep them on top.
If Vandy and Middle Tennessee St had a late bloomer/under the radar stud.. the elites would snatch them up. The elites have another thing in common, a huge following that will feed their favorite program to keep them on top.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 4:08 pm to AP77
quote:
Parity rules and I envision in the near term games where Georgia loses to Vanderbilt and Alabama loses to Middle Tenn State.
Too much money involved and too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
MTSU and Vandy are not going to be paying Alabama's third stringers more than Alabama can, and players have always had the ability to choose MTSU and Vandy over Bama if playing time was their primary concern.
The best players still want elite coaching, competition against the best, and an overall atmosphere and environment with a track record of putting players into the NFL.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 4:10 pm to AP77
Dawgs going nowhere
Posted on 10/4/23 at 5:16 pm to AP77
There might be more parity between the big programs but it will only further separate the big guys (Bama, UGA, tOSU, etc) from the rest of us.
I have to say that I’m just so darned tired. Programs like mine don’t stand a chance. In the 70s it was increasing scholarships. That was the first blow. Now we got NIL - which is fine- except that now it’s a bidding war before the kid even gets to school. It was never supposed to be that. Now we got wide open transfers- some of it is good for the kid- but, as with everything else, it’s gone too far. I can envision every one of our good players leaving, then what? So we are just a feeder system for you? We have less than 7000 undergrads; you think we are going to get walk-ons? Now we got schools that can just dump all their players and get new ones. Do you think schools like Vandy would do that? I hope all the Bigs just form their own super league and let the rest of us have fun playing competitive football with a more balanced playing field in normal geographic conference with normal rules for schools that want to keep ‘schools’ in the equation. I’ve been watching football for almost 70 years, and I’m just not enjoying it any more. I watch the Vandy game and cheer like hell for our guys to do well and that’s about it. Watching all you semi-pros (and they are extraordinary) just doesn’t give me any fun anymore. Sorry for this but, every week it’s just the same. It depresses me now. What’s the point?
I have to say that I’m just so darned tired. Programs like mine don’t stand a chance. In the 70s it was increasing scholarships. That was the first blow. Now we got NIL - which is fine- except that now it’s a bidding war before the kid even gets to school. It was never supposed to be that. Now we got wide open transfers- some of it is good for the kid- but, as with everything else, it’s gone too far. I can envision every one of our good players leaving, then what? So we are just a feeder system for you? We have less than 7000 undergrads; you think we are going to get walk-ons? Now we got schools that can just dump all their players and get new ones. Do you think schools like Vandy would do that? I hope all the Bigs just form their own super league and let the rest of us have fun playing competitive football with a more balanced playing field in normal geographic conference with normal rules for schools that want to keep ‘schools’ in the equation. I’ve been watching football for almost 70 years, and I’m just not enjoying it any more. I watch the Vandy game and cheer like hell for our guys to do well and that’s about it. Watching all you semi-pros (and they are extraordinary) just doesn’t give me any fun anymore. Sorry for this but, every week it’s just the same. It depresses me now. What’s the point?
Posted on 10/4/23 at 5:35 pm to AP77
quote:The Alabamas and Georgias of the college football world are in far better position with the NIL dynamic than the Vanderbilts and Middle Tennessees
Parity rules and I envision in the near term games where Georgia loses to Vanderbilt and Alabama loses to Middle Tenn State.
Too much money involved and too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 7:07 pm to AP77
How is it "parity" if people still choose where they want to go?
This post was edited on 10/4/23 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:04 pm to AP77
Which programs do you think have the biggest NIL warchests?
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:21 pm to AP77
So you are saying that the boosters of the Vandy’s and MTSU’s of the world will outbid the boosters of the Alabama’s and Georgia’s of the world for players they want.
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:35 pm to AP77
Georgia has not had a dynasty so no big deal
Posted on 10/4/23 at 8:35 pm to AP77
quote:
too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
If they were good enough to be on the field for Bama or Georgia they wouldn't have to transfer. How is a team full of 3rd stringers gonna win a title when they got to play the guys they couldn't beat out?
Posted on 10/5/23 at 12:51 am to AP77
FCS NDSU is already feeling it.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 1:02 am to AP77
Parity means not as many elite teams.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 7:26 am to AP77
quote:
Alabama, Georgia, Notre Dame, etc. get ready for (wait for it) PARITY.
Yes, assuming the ncaa continues (no assurance) the implementation of revised/revising transfer rules and NIL have totally changed the concept of football dynasties.
Parity rules and I envision in the near term games where Georgia loses to Vanderbilt and Alabama loses to Middle Tenn State.
Too much money involved and too many good players unwilling to be 3rd on a dynasty depth chart.
Don’t cry for me Argentina, make that Georgia!
Parity will last about 3 seasons and the cream will adjust and rise to the top like it always does.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 7:28 am to AP77
When I see you finish top 5 in recruiting rankings, I'll start believing.
Posted on 10/5/23 at 8:38 am to AP77
Notre Dame hasn’t won a championship in 35 years
Posted on 10/5/23 at 9:05 am to AP77
The GA dynasty is 5-0 baw not sure what you are talking about
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News