Started By
Message

re: Would you take another 3-2 victory this weekend?

Posted on 10/5/16 at 8:47 am to
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36723 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 8:47 am to
Our offense was just as inept against Clemson and TAM. It's not like the LSU game was an outlier. We are in the SEC which boasts a lot of talented defensive rosters. The excuse that we played against good defenses isn't going to fly week in and week out.
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 9:08 am to
I'll take any win, but it would be depressing.
Posted by JRoweMDN
Florida
Member since Jan 2016
703 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 9:13 am to
I will take any win. I would also feel like we had finally lost our way completely. I will feel the same if we win by all FG again this week.

I am still a sunshine pumper and I don't believe it will be the case. I think SW has his breakout week and we look like an offense.
Posted by joeyb147
Member since Jun 2009
16019 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 9:13 am to
downvoted out of principle
Posted by AU_251
Your dads room
Member since Feb 2013
11559 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Would you take


quote:

victory


Yes. Every time
Posted by Fear The Thumb
Coastal, AL
Member since Nov 2012
3368 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 12:33 pm to
When the 3-2 game was over it still felt like a loss.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
28907 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 12:50 pm to
quote:

Its sad as shite but we are 1-3 against State in the last 4 games

Probably the worst stat of Gus's HC tenure.
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10572 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Our offense was just as inept against Clemson and TAM. It's not like the LSU game was an outlier. We are in the SEC which boasts a lot of talented defensive rosters. The excuse that we played against good defenses isn't going to fly week in and week out.


Which is precisely my point. 400 yards isn't good enough now. Clemson is actually the outlier in terms of yardage. So that leaves one area of struggle overall, the redzone and pass protection. Things are looking pretty good with a list that short.
This post was edited on 10/5/16 at 2:11 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36723 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Which is precisely my point. 400 yards isn't good enough now

Neither the total yards nor the passing completion percentage, nor the total plays per game are the appropriate measurements to gauge how effective the offense is. Ever since peewee football, we have been taught that that main goal of the offense is to score touchdowns. That should be the ultimate measuring stick. Usually, in a healthy offense, the yards, the total plays, etc will accumulate in conjunction with scoring more and more touchdowns. As such, spend less time worrying about that crap and spend more time scrutinizing our ultimate problem. And that would be only scoring 15ppg against power five teams. No matter how short our list of problems is, by not being able to score TDs, which is the main offensive goal of football, our list of problems might as well be long. We're going to lose games that we shouldn't and we're going to sacrifice our exceptional play in other areas for a mediocre season.
This post was edited on 10/5/16 at 3:05 pm
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10572 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Neither the total yards nor the passing completion percentage, nor the total plays per game are the appropriate measurements to gauge how effective the offense is. 


It's as if you totally disregarded the last part of my post.

Regardless, the main goal is scoring more points than the competition, and yes, even field goals add to that total. Of course a TD is preferable, but for Christ's sake, the offense is young, there are going to be growing pains in finding an identity.
This post was edited on 10/5/16 at 3:52 pm
Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36723 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

It's as if you totally disregarded the last part of my post.

How so?

Our team may be young but the offensive problems are well into its 16th game. At some point, we are going to have to score TDs if Gus wants to retain his job.
Posted by PubeCrab
Member since May 2014
831 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 4:37 pm to
Am I the only one who finds no humor in still referencing the "3-2" game? It was 8 years ago...
Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10572 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

How so?


Because I specifically referenced redzone struggles only for you to bring them up. I understand that completely, but I wholeheartedly believe it will be fixed, and that will be Franklin coming in inside the 25, unless pass protection improves.
Posted by LanierSpots
Sarasota, Florida
Member since Sep 2010
61840 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

no humor in still referencing the "3-2" game? It was 8 years ago...



The game that lives in infamy.


Posted by jangalang
Member since Dec 2014
36723 posts
Posted on 10/5/16 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Because I specifically referenced redzone struggles only for you to bring them up.

If we are going to be technical about it, I mentioned the inability to score TDs. Redzone or not. Also, you downplayed our list of problems as small even though the one problem is literally huge.
Posted by jvilletiger25
jacksonville, fl
Member since Jan 2014
17032 posts
Posted on 10/6/16 at 8:16 am to
I'd be nervous for the rest of the season if we only beat Moo State 3-2. If that happens, you can chalk up a loss to Arkmart, Thuga and UAT. And possibly Vandy too.
Posted by Pavoloco83
Acworth Ga. too many damn dawgs
Member since Nov 2013
15347 posts
Posted on 10/6/16 at 11:23 pm to
I'd take it. It the blue balls it would cause on here would be epic.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter