Started By
Message
More infill proposed for downtown Fayetteville.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:34 am
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:34 am
Posted on 6/21/16 at 12:19 pm to Numberwang
Umm can we please fix the Mountain Inn eyesore?
Why won't anyone freaking develop that spot? It's a prime location.
Why won't anyone freaking develop that spot? It's a prime location.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 12:31 pm to STLhog
quote:
Why won't anyone freaking develop that spot? It's a prime location.
It is a prominent location, but for all intents and purposes, that's the edge of downtown. Think of it from a "park and walk to" scenario. There's no ability to park and walk to that spot from the east or south, as the topography drops off sharply into the ravine.
There's an owner who has said they will redevelop it at some point, but I haven't heard anything specific in a long time. I'd think someone gets sick of paying annual property taxes on it, although there is pay parking there right now that probably covers at least that part of it.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 5:47 pm to Numberwang
Great, another building with $1800/month lofts and first floor commercial
How about some people move into the first two before we build more
How about some people move into the first two before we build more
Posted on 6/21/16 at 6:29 pm to Porker Face
The big condo buildings still have vacancies, but those projects blew their pro-forma because they shot for sales of small units at a really high price point, and used a lot of steel in construction, back when steel was at a premium. I don't think the Legacy Building has ever been realistically priced.
They're gradually being retraded and downgraded in price as each subsequent owner realizes that.
That's no reason to not root for this project. I am not sure if they are proposed as rentals or as condos, but it's a nice building from a good architect. I have no desire to move downtown. Too loud and busy. But good for anybody who does.
Mark Zweig recently sold two houses on Church Ave for $900k a piece. The market definitely exists for more high-end downtown, you just have to find the sweet spot of good amenities, high quality, and decent price point.
They're gradually being retraded and downgraded in price as each subsequent owner realizes that.
That's no reason to not root for this project. I am not sure if they are proposed as rentals or as condos, but it's a nice building from a good architect. I have no desire to move downtown. Too loud and busy. But good for anybody who does.
Mark Zweig recently sold two houses on Church Ave for $900k a piece. The market definitely exists for more high-end downtown, you just have to find the sweet spot of good amenities, high quality, and decent price point.
This post was edited on 6/21/16 at 6:30 pm
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:04 pm to Porker Face
Whoever down voted me better live in Legacy or The Dickson or else they are a damn hypocrite
Not my fault I speak the truth about NWA real estate
Not my fault I speak the truth about NWA real estate
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:09 pm to Porker Face
People love to talk about infill and pretend Fayetteville is a little Portland. It just isn't so. We can build all the 8 story buildings we want, but if people don't move in, it doesn't matter.
No shortage of single family subdivisions on the drawing board though
No shortage of single family subdivisions on the drawing board though
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:22 pm to Porker Face
quote:
We can build all the 8 story buildings we want, but if people don't move in, it doesn't matter.
I didn't downvote you.
All of the cheaper apartment buildings, which are almost entirely stick-built, seem to have no problem with vacancies. There are about five of them within walking distance of this proposal. They are still decried by some as being "expensive urban fantasy-land for rich kids from Texas".
The problem with the other pricier buildings is that they weren't realistic in their price-point from the start. They overpaid for land and overpaid for materials. You can only build about 6-7 stories without using a ton of steel.
Good buildings that are thoughtfully planned will have no problem finding renters or owners. Fayetteville apartment vacancies are still at or near record lows.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:24 pm to Porker Face
quote:
pretend Fayetteville is a little Portland. It just isn't so
How
fricking
DARE
You?
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:36 pm to wmr
Sorry, it just isn't. Ask our alderman, our planning commission, our city staff. These people all have the dreams of a urban mixed use streetscape with street trees, permeable pavement, bioswales, liner buildings, trails everywhere, access management, etc. But they are also realistic enough to know the next 5 years of fayetteville will largely be single family residential in west Fayetteville. Just like Rogers, Bentonville and Springdale. And probably the next 20
Hell look at Metro District, which is the same developer. Expensive as frick rents and lots of vacancies. But I'm sure he will make these more affordable. Smh
Keep dreaming. People dont move to NWA to live in a loft. They can do that in an actual urban city. Proof: no one here actually lives in the scores of urban mixed use bs we already have
But what do I know, I just work with developers, planners, and municipal staff all day
Hell look at Metro District, which is the same developer. Expensive as frick rents and lots of vacancies. But I'm sure he will make these more affordable. Smh
Keep dreaming. People dont move to NWA to live in a loft. They can do that in an actual urban city. Proof: no one here actually lives in the scores of urban mixed use bs we already have
But what do I know, I just work with developers, planners, and municipal staff all day
Posted on 6/21/16 at 7:39 pm to wmr
I don't think you did.
The difference is those target students exclusively
These will target non students exclusively
The difference is those target students exclusively
These will target non students exclusively
Posted on 6/21/16 at 8:02 pm to Porker Face
It's a pretty building. Why the frick do you care if it succeeds once it is built?
I've never been in the upper floors of Three Sisters, but I like looking at it and I have drank in the ground floor bars. That's good enough for me.
I like The Dickson. I am not a fan of Legacy, but I've enjoyed dinner there. My main issue is that they went cheap on the finishes late in the game, trying to make up for excess on the front-end.
I've never been in the upper floors of Three Sisters, but I like looking at it and I have drank in the ground floor bars. That's good enough for me.
I like The Dickson. I am not a fan of Legacy, but I've enjoyed dinner there. My main issue is that they went cheap on the finishes late in the game, trying to make up for excess on the front-end.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 8:08 pm to Porker Face
quote:
Proof: no one here actually lives in the scores of urban mixed use bs we already have
This is just not true. The condos on the square are lived in. The "student oriented apartments" are full, and one of them sold for $49 million recently. Several smaller urban infill projects have plenty of residents.
The only two that have struggled to fill up are Legacy and The Dickson (formerly Underwood). I'd bet you $100 that both of them are at a minimum half full any given month of the year. They weren't good investments, but that's not because "nobody wants to live downtown".
People are willing to pay $900k to live downtown a few blocks off Dickson. There are new high-dollar townhomes going up on Block Ave shortly.
LINK
Demand exists at a certain price point. If it didn't, nobody would be building.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 8:35 pm to wmr
I do like the architectural style and homage to old, local buildings. But I'm kind of tired of people pretending about what Fayetteville and NWA are
Look at downtown Bentonville. Thrive and the NW corner of the square. People are redoing 100 year old SF houses near downtown and people eat it up. Condos not so much
Same in Fay. Student apts work great. Renovated luxury SF such as Zweigs properties or those on Spring work great. Nothing in The Dickson or Legacy. Hell they converted both to have "hotel" rooms to try and help the 70-90% vacancies they have
Fayetteville is a lot more about strip malls along Van Ache and row houses along Rupple. Probably always will be
Look at downtown Bentonville. Thrive and the NW corner of the square. People are redoing 100 year old SF houses near downtown and people eat it up. Condos not so much
Same in Fay. Student apts work great. Renovated luxury SF such as Zweigs properties or those on Spring work great. Nothing in The Dickson or Legacy. Hell they converted both to have "hotel" rooms to try and help the 70-90% vacancies they have
Fayetteville is a lot more about strip malls along Van Ache and row houses along Rupple. Probably always will be
Posted on 6/21/16 at 8:57 pm to Porker Face
I look forward to all you down voting fricks providing some rebuttal arguments based on development, planning or zoning perspectives and not just fantasy land urbanite shite from Austin or Portland
Tia
Tia
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:15 pm to Porker Face
You're so freaking mad. I don't understand why.
Developers generally only build what people will buy or rent. I agree that those two specific projects were fricked up. Eventually, someone will live in them. Someone owns them now and pays the interest on the notes, maybe even just from revenues from the businesses in the ground floors. People don't generally buy buildings to intentionally take a loss on them.
Developers propose projects that they think will work, because people don't generally deliberately frick themselves financially. Those two specific projects were last-boom-cycle hubris. They had so much in them that the Legacy was offering 800 sq ft for sale for $500k. That's crazy. $1100 a month for 1000 sq ft in a stick-built building, not so much.
There are a lot of row-houses and even condos planned for downtown Bentonville right now.
You're saying that these people are pretending to be something the area is not. Well, if that's correct, they'll frick themselves financially and won't ever build anything again. I personally believe downtown Bentonville will be full of midrise development in the near future, just because land values have gone through the roof, and the number of amenities down there will dictate demand and eventually make developers want to go vertical. NIMBYs will fight it, as they have in downtown Rogers. But eventually, it will happen.
I think you've got a little too much Scots-Irish reactionary blood in you if the decisions of private developers cause you this much anger.
Developers generally only build what people will buy or rent. I agree that those two specific projects were fricked up. Eventually, someone will live in them. Someone owns them now and pays the interest on the notes, maybe even just from revenues from the businesses in the ground floors. People don't generally buy buildings to intentionally take a loss on them.
Developers propose projects that they think will work, because people don't generally deliberately frick themselves financially. Those two specific projects were last-boom-cycle hubris. They had so much in them that the Legacy was offering 800 sq ft for sale for $500k. That's crazy. $1100 a month for 1000 sq ft in a stick-built building, not so much.
There are a lot of row-houses and even condos planned for downtown Bentonville right now.
You're saying that these people are pretending to be something the area is not. Well, if that's correct, they'll frick themselves financially and won't ever build anything again. I personally believe downtown Bentonville will be full of midrise development in the near future, just because land values have gone through the roof, and the number of amenities down there will dictate demand and eventually make developers want to go vertical. NIMBYs will fight it, as they have in downtown Rogers. But eventually, it will happen.
I think you've got a little too much Scots-Irish reactionary blood in you if the decisions of private developers cause you this much anger.
This post was edited on 6/21/16 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:41 pm to wmr
I'm not mad, I love the debate. I talk about this subject with a lot of people that matter all the time. I enjoy it, and I am glad you have contributed from a place of logic and intelligence
I'm just trying to engage the drive by fricks who disagree with me but don't actually bring their own facts.
I'm just trying to engage the drive by fricks who disagree with me but don't actually bring their own facts.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 9:59 pm to Porker Face
Regarding Austin....
The vast majority of Austin has been built post 1960. Hell, over half of it has been built post 1980. Most of the city of Austin (which is over 10x the size of Nam) consists of subdivisions, cul de sacs and single family homes. Maybe 30,000-40,000 people live in urban high rise development there right now. That's less than 5% of the city.
Fayetteville has a population of 84,000 or so, depending on growth occurring right now. 5% of Fayetteville is 4,200 people. I'd wager that nearly that many people in Fayetteville already live in that type of housing, or will this fall when three new mid-rise buildings open up.
The primary comparisons to places like Austin and Portland are in the millennial-heavy (which NWA actually is, according to studies) college town, progressive, outdoorsy, craft-beer drinking, dog-park using, white people enjoying, coffee-drinking atmosphere.
Fayetteville and NWA at large do as well with those categories as anybody.
The vast majority of Austin has been built post 1960. Hell, over half of it has been built post 1980. Most of the city of Austin (which is over 10x the size of Nam) consists of subdivisions, cul de sacs and single family homes. Maybe 30,000-40,000 people live in urban high rise development there right now. That's less than 5% of the city.
Fayetteville has a population of 84,000 or so, depending on growth occurring right now. 5% of Fayetteville is 4,200 people. I'd wager that nearly that many people in Fayetteville already live in that type of housing, or will this fall when three new mid-rise buildings open up.
The primary comparisons to places like Austin and Portland are in the millennial-heavy (which NWA actually is, according to studies) college town, progressive, outdoorsy, craft-beer drinking, dog-park using, white people enjoying, coffee-drinking atmosphere.
Fayetteville and NWA at large do as well with those categories as anybody.
This post was edited on 6/21/16 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 6/21/16 at 11:07 pm to Porker Face
We (and especially Bentoville) are in field of dreams mode, as I like to call it. There's nothing wrong with aspirations, which you're so disdainfully dismissive toward. Aspirations often shape trends and the reality. It's better than a bunch of message board sideline developers sitting around naysaying and talking about how it should have been done differently.
My main bitch with NWA (and Bentonville specifically) development is that certain businesses and developments are being artificially propped up by wealthy benefactors which doesn't make for a healthy, competitive marketplace.
My main bitch with NWA (and Bentonville specifically) development is that certain businesses and developments are being artificially propped up by wealthy benefactors which doesn't make for a healthy, competitive marketplace.
Posted on 6/22/16 at 6:46 am to hogfly
I would love for light rail and all that other urbanite shite to happen
I'm also realistic. We will need some non chain restaurant development first. Everyone loves to talk about the new damn taco bell. What is this, Bryant? People talking about taco bells?
I'm also realistic. We will need some non chain restaurant development first. Everyone loves to talk about the new damn taco bell. What is this, Bryant? People talking about taco bells?
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News