Started By
Message
re: april 2014 something big is coming....but what?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:58 pm to I Ham That I Ham
Posted on 4/22/14 at 4:58 pm to I Ham That I Ham
quote:
It's so nice that we're preserving tradition by surrounding the running hog with a bunch of other crap that's not traditional (random tusks, brand new logo that looks like it's from a coloring book, new font every year, flywire collar used by every other school, etc.)
Agreed. I'm a longtime Long supporter, but this shite has to stop.
Lettering and number font looks like absolute shite. Honestly, if there was one font I didn't want, it's the one we got.
2
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:01 pm to Feral
quote:
Lettering and number font looks like absolute shite. Honestly, if there was one font I didn't want, it's the one we got.
i freaking love the font. the font on the dmac uniforms was total shite- it look(ed) like something straight out of 1981 and not in a cool retro way. and speaking of the dmac uniforms, they weren't that damn great anyway overall. boring, saggy, blah.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:03 pm to Razorback Reverend
quote:
THe unis look good to me personally, yet again, if we start winning I could not care what they look like!
Why is this always the prevailing sentiment. All I heard in early '08 was "ZOMG THE NEW JERSEYS ARE TIGHT" and now everyone craps all over them. Ditto for the redesign in '12 and '13.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:04 pm to piggilicious
quote:
i freaking love the font. the font on the dmac uniforms was total shite- it look(ed) like something straight out of 1981 and not in a cool retro way.
LOL wut? It was essentially standard block font. We got knockoff Denver Broncos font crap now.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:11 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
Yeah we've worn those what, twice, since 2006? And have had the combo every year.
We wore red on red in the Reggie Herring Cotton Bowl, once or twice in the Petrino era, I believe in 2012, and last year against LSU, just off the top of my head.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 5:12 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:15 pm to Feral
frick there is way too much bitching in this thread. These uniforms are an upgrade over what we previously have had in the last 5-7 years, what else does anyone want
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:18 pm to Feral
quote:
LOL wut? It was essentially standard block font.
Boring as hell looked like back when there were only 3 fonts available to choose from- those unis were nothing special at all.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:19 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
frick there is way too much bitching in this thread. These uniforms are an upgrade over what we previously have had in the last 5-7 years, what else does anyone want
but it's change bruh, change!!1!1
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:20 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
These uniforms are an upgrade over what we previously have had in the last 5-7 years
I really don't see how anyone could argue with this
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:22 pm to Hubbhogg
quote:
frick there is way too much bitching in this thread. These uniforms are an upgrade over what we previously have had in the last 5-7 years, what else does anyone want
I wouldn't call them an upgrade over what we had in 2010 and 2011, outside of that 'ARKANSAS' on the pants those years.
Poop that smells better than other poop is still poop.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:25 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
hawgfaninc
quote:
Stanford Fan
That's funny, considering it's my alma mater. I'm not incessantly complaining about the new design or averse to change, I just don't particularly like it. Why do you seem to have such an issue with it?
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:29 pm to Feral
quote:
I wouldn't call them an upgrade over what we had in 2010 and 2011, outside of that 'ARKANSAS' on the pants those years.
These are significantly better than the home uniforms that we had in '10 and '11.
Those road uniforms though.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:31 pm to Feral
It's probably already been mentioned, but the only thing I really don't like are the armpit tusks on the Football Unis. I'm fine with the rest of it.
Probably won't ever buy anything with that secondary logo, but I don't care that it exists.
Probably won't ever buy anything with that secondary logo, but I don't care that it exists.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 5:32 pm to Feral
quote:
Why do you seem to have such an issue with it?
tell me again what bitching about it accomplishes?
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:50 pm to The Sultan of Swine
Profile shots of the uniforms where you can see the striping better.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:53 pm to TheCheshireHog
The white is
Great shots.
Great shots.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:55 pm to SunHog
Yeah the white one is extremely sharp.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 6:56 pm to SunHog
The white is fricking amazing. 
I love the simple pant stripe, not big, not wide, it's perfect.
The shoulder tusk stripe is great, and I don't mind the chest tusk but would rather it not be there but again it's really not that bad at all. I do really like the shoulder one though.
They did a great job, font is amazing and the jerseys in football and especially basketball are great.
I love the simple pant stripe, not big, not wide, it's perfect.
The shoulder tusk stripe is great, and I don't mind the chest tusk but would rather it not be there but again it's really not that bad at all. I do really like the shoulder one though.
They did a great job, font is amazing and the jerseys in football and especially basketball are great.
Posted on 4/22/14 at 7:04 pm to UltimateHog
I like the thinner pant stripe as well. I was never a fan of how thick it was on this most recent uniform.
Page 30 of 33
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News