Started By
Message

re: Does this graphic make UA 2012 the GOAT?

Posted on 6/25/15 at 12:42 pm to
Posted by CrimsonCowboy
Member since Sep 2014
516 posts
Posted on 6/25/15 at 12:42 pm to
2001 miami > 1995 nebraska
Posted by Lordofwrath88
Tuscaloosa
Member since Oct 2012
6857 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:06 am to
nah, Nebraska had a better schedule... remember, Miami went undefeated in the Big East and then drubbed an 2001 Nebraska team who had less business in the title game than Notre Dame did in 2012.
This post was edited on 6/28/15 at 1:33 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65113 posts
Posted on 6/28/15 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

Miami went undefeated in the ACC


They were in the Big East at that time. But your point still stands. When I was editing together 2001 Alabama Highlights, I remember watching some of those halftime shows. A lot of commentators knocked '01 Miami's conference schedule.

Their argument for GOAT is in response to how many players got drafted into the NFL and became super stars. Sure. They were insanely talented. But that doesn't mean they were the best team. 2010 Alabama had 11 first rounders on its roster and still managed to lose 3 games.
Posted by The Silverback
Neptune
Member since May 2013
2036 posts
Posted on 6/29/15 at 1:46 pm to
01 Miami is one of the most overrated teams of all time. Sure they were an excellent team that was very well rounded. But I absolutely agree that they are seen as GOAT simply based on talent. People who say 01 Miami beats everyone because of their roster is either biased or ignorant
Posted by CrimsonCowboy
Member since Sep 2014
516 posts
Posted on 7/3/15 at 2:35 pm to
idk, i cant argue much with the 95 neb team, but i think that works both ways, talent wise, 2001 miami was probably the best ever.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter