Shanna Lockwood-USA TODAY Sports
Former Auburn coach Pat Dye joined the Paul Finebaum show this week and said that SEC should realign its division by moving Missouri to the West and Auburn to the East. Per AL.com:
quote:

"Just think about the inconvenience of the Missouri fans having to travel to the East to watch games on the road, of the families that want to go watch their children play," Dye said. "It just makes no sense for Missouri to be in the East.

"(Auburn is) on the Eastern part of Alabama. We're 30 miles from Georgia. We touch Florida and Tennessee, and we need to be in the East. And Missouri needs to be in the West. They could build traditional games with people that are closer to them, where the fans could travel. ... It's a tremendous disadvantage to Missouri being in the East."
LSU has played Auburn every year since 1992. The two schools have played each other a total of 50 times dating back to 1901.

LSU and Missouri played each other for the first time as SEC opponents last year, with the Bayou Bengals beating Mizzou 42-7 in Tiger Stadium. It was the second all-time meeting between the two schools.

Loading Twitter Embed....
Filed Under: LSU Football
Originally published on TigerDroppings.com
48 Comments
user avatar
GermantownTiger83 months
Good
user avatar
poncho villa83 months
yeah Auburn doesn't benefit from moving to the east...
user avatar
Guava Jelly83 months
They really don't all that much. Still have to face Bama every year because they won't get rid of the Iron Bowl. Then they'd trade LSU/TAMU/Arkansas for Florida/UGA/Tennessee. Really not all that big a difference over the course of 10-20 years in terms of overall difficulty, objectively speaking.
user avatar
Sasquatch Smash83 months
This really goes to Guava Jelly. But with the current cross-divisional rules there is only one permanent opponent. Alabama already has a long standing rivalry with an East team in Tennessee. I doubt they'd be willing to give either game up, meaning the move won't happen unless they both go. Which would make the East the power base in the conference with Bama, Auburn, UGA, UT, and UF.
user avatar
SaintLSU83 months
It is common sense. Which means it ain't happening in the SEC
user avatar
LSUtigers11183 months
"... It's a tremendous disadvantage to Missouri being in the East." I bet Missouri would strongly disagree with you on that one.
user avatar
Old83 months
Alabama + Auburn should never have been SEC East. It w3as Alabama's way of keeping LSU weak. Dye wants Auburn not to face Oklahoma each season.
user avatar
Old83 months
I mean't "Alabama + Auburn should never have been SEC West."
user avatar
Tiger Prawn83 months
When did Oklahoma join the SEC?
user avatar
Old83 months
Alabama + Auburn should never have been SEC East. It w3as Alabama's way of keeping LSU weak. Dye wants Auburn not to face Oklahoma each season.
user avatar
zoom83 months
Bama schools both to the east. Add Oklahoma and some other school to the west with mizzu
user avatar
BestBanker83 months
Just remove Missouri. Problem solved.
user avatar
Tchefuncte Tiger83 months
Agree 100%
user avatar
LSUbest83 months
I Agree, thought it should have been done when they expanded.
user avatar
LoveThatMoney83 months
This is a "no shite" comment.
user avatar
WPsportsman83 months
Of course they want to be in the east and not play Lsu and bama every year.
user avatar
Biggmatt7883 months
They'd still play Bama every year like we play Florida
user avatar
JGTiger83 months
Am I the only one that doesn't want to give up the home game with AU & Bama every other year. Not too thrilling to have Mizzou in Tiger Stadium every other year compared to the Auburn game.
user avatar
TriDitty83 months
I love going against Bama every year minus the losses of coarse. I always said that it's better to be the giant killer than the giant.
user avatar
TriDitty83 months
I love going against Bama every year minus the losses of coarse. I always said that it's better to be the giant killer than the giant.
user avatar
blueboy83 months
frick Pat Dye and his stupid bullshite. Missouri doesn't even belong in the SEC. Congrats on winning the East when all of the other teams were struggling, but you asswhippings in the SECCG pretty much proved that you don't fit. We should can them and get someone good like Oklahoma. Even though their fans at stupid assholes.
user avatar
TigerDM83 months
Alabama and Auburn should be in the east, Missouri and Kentucky should be in the west. That would eleminate the problem of the disproportion in the quality of the permanent opponent that exist now. The schools that insist on playing each other every year would be in the same division. Then you could go to a rotation of playing the teams from the other division so you played them on a more regular basis
user avatar
Colonel Flagg83 months
Move Auburn and Alabama to the East and bring Missouri and Vanderbilt to the West. It would be awesome to go to Nashville for away games every other year.
user avatar
kjntgr83 months
That's the best reason you can come up with for moving bama out and vandy in? Lol
user avatar
AtlantaLSUfan83 months
I want to hate it, but it makes sense.
user avatar
Chitter Chatter83 months
So does that mean Dye wants AU to give up the Iron Bowl? Because either Bama is gonna have to give up playing Tennessee or Auburn if only AU goes east. The real question should be 'what does Bama want?'
user avatar
skullopener83 months
Tennessee & Auburn should switch places. That way Bama can keep permanent East opponent as Iran Bowl and get to play Tennessee every year.
user avatar
ImayGoLesMiles83 months
Pat dye is border line retarded and even he can see this. That should tell you something.
Popular Stories
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter