Started By
Message

re: Why is Briles not mentioned as a candidate for A&M?

Posted on 12/5/11 at 4:42 pm to
Posted by Johnnybroxxx
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2011
77 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 4:42 pm to
If tamu administration is serious about becoming a powerhouse in the SEC, then a&m has to make a big splash. Sumlin is a no, ferodora is a gamble, smart is as well, strong is a solid choice, but I think an established winner is the only way the aggies achieve their goals, I think Richt is the ideal choice.
Posted by Johnnybroxxx
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2011
77 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

"ferodora"


Totally mispelled his name, my bad.
Posted by CavalryAg07
ChiTown
Member since Jul 2009
2772 posts
Posted on 12/5/11 at 4:49 pm to
I like Fedora for alot of reasons, and Strong, but the Richt angle came up today and I think we will test the waters. just gonna have to wait a day or two and see the cream rise to the top. I bet there are a few other names putting feelers out to A&M that isn't message board material.

A&M made this move to SEC knowing full well what we are getting into. It's now time for the big time donors to put their money where their mouth is, the AD can't cover all these costs by itself. If our motto really is to " change the game" then we need to freaking do it.

This post was edited on 12/5/11 at 5:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram