- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: USC players in the NFL
Posted on 8/22/09 at 2:34 pm to el tigre
Posted on 8/22/09 at 2:34 pm to el tigre
It is pretty common to criticize powerhouse programs by pointing out the low rate of successful transitions their players make from college to the NFL. But the critics usually ignore the fact that that rate of success is not all that great for almost any university.
Miami players from the late 90s and early 2000s seem to be an exception. Other than that... the rate of hits and misses from any school is not that stellar.
Miami players from the late 90s and early 2000s seem to be an exception. Other than that... the rate of hits and misses from any school is not that stellar.
Posted on 8/22/09 at 5:23 pm to Tebow4ReElection
Many of you miss the point that college football, while some believe it to be a farm system, is not. It's about entertainment and winning games. That is why many players are not prepared for the NFL coming out of college. In baseball, the prospects stats are important, but their training is easier to apply to the pros since the scheme is almost identical.
High school and college football, gameplay-wise differ greatly from the pro-game.
That is why so many QBs bust in the NFL with their hype from successful teams, while many great players from great teams fail. They succeed because their programs had better NFL training, which may have resulted in less success for their teams at the collegiate level.
USC gets a lot of hype, so its players get a lot of hype. On defense the transition is easier. On offense, not so easy. Even Lendale White, although improved from his first year, is nothing special at RB.
Of all the USC players, Mike Williams and Jarret have bombed the worst with Leinart just behind them. Booty can't be bashed yet since he wasn't expected to be like those guys coming out of college. Same for Cassell. He had absolutely no hype and was a flyer that NE took with a late round pick.
USC has been solid with their OL drafted players, and obviously on many of their defensive players. I'd say at least 50% hit rate on defense for solid to great play.
WR, RB, and QB have obviously had lower hit rates, but I'd venture likely are close to other big universities.
High school and college football, gameplay-wise differ greatly from the pro-game.
That is why so many QBs bust in the NFL with their hype from successful teams, while many great players from great teams fail. They succeed because their programs had better NFL training, which may have resulted in less success for their teams at the collegiate level.
USC gets a lot of hype, so its players get a lot of hype. On defense the transition is easier. On offense, not so easy. Even Lendale White, although improved from his first year, is nothing special at RB.
Of all the USC players, Mike Williams and Jarret have bombed the worst with Leinart just behind them. Booty can't be bashed yet since he wasn't expected to be like those guys coming out of college. Same for Cassell. He had absolutely no hype and was a flyer that NE took with a late round pick.
USC has been solid with their OL drafted players, and obviously on many of their defensive players. I'd say at least 50% hit rate on defense for solid to great play.
WR, RB, and QB have obviously had lower hit rates, but I'd venture likely are close to other big universities.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News