hall59tiger
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2472 |
| Registered on: | 10/6/2013 |
| Online Status: | Online |
Recent Posts
Message
Grand Isle Navigational Hazards
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/16/24 at 8:39 am
I may go stay at brightside marina for a couple nights in June. I’ve never even been on the island before so I have a couple questions.
Are there any restaurants or tackle shops I should experience down there?
What are some navigational concerns I should consider? (Not looking for spots) I fish o...
2
re: Hidden costs of boat ownership
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/15/24 at 9:00 am
I’m coming up on 2 years with my Heron 16 and it’s been an extremely economical boat so far.
Insurance - 600ish
Routine Maintenance - less than 150/year
Cleaning - 100/year
Replacing gear - 50/year
I’ve slowly upgraded stuff over time like boat buckles, NMEA cables, and a hardier trolling motor...
re: LSU 3 @ Alabama 4 Final
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/12/24 at 4:07 pm
[quote]It felt over friday night[/quote]
That’s when things got real for me. I think a lot of the fighting about “interference gate” was us taking it out on each other. There have been some fun moments but overall this was a rough one. ...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 2:14 pm
[quote]You can’t possibly look at the picture in your post and think it resembles the Maryland play in any way.[/quote]
I’m clearly talking over some of yalls heads. Either I’m not explaining things well or people on here have trouble juggling multivariate, nuanced arguments. Probably a bit of bo...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 2:07 pm
Really neat pic. Thanks for the invigorating conversation!...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:59 pm
[quote] he isn’t in his throwing lane to first[/quote]
Yes, he is. Even more egregiously so than the other examples provided. That’s abundantly clear for those willing to be objective.
I’m done lol.!The quote “never cast your pearls to swine” applies well here. You guys can believe whatever yo...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:53 pm
[quote]1. You interfere with the throw while being outside the line[/quote
This is exactly what happened lol.
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/Qx42ZHHV/IMG-8383.png[/img]
Throw left Millazo’s hand before the runner got back in the baseline….interfering with his throwing lane to first. Same with th...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:44 pm
[quote]The physics there shows the Maryland player being inside the line when he runs into the 1st baseman[/quote]
So now we are switching it up a bit, ehh? The pitchers throw was way way off line so the runner actually didn’t impede the throw. That’s all that matters, huh? Unless the PHYSICS cau...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:43 pm
[quote]Except it didn’t[/quote]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/Wb5Mhtzg/IMG-8384.png[/img]
Like this one didn’t?
...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:36 pm
[quote]Look here, why in gods earth would the purple dot think, “I NEED TO THROW THIS FURTHER RIGHT!!!”[/quote]
I would be really surprised if Milazzo had the time to sit there and think about the “Physics” of that play. It doesn’t matter where the throw went. What matters is it interfered with h...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:28 pm
[quote]Even if the runner is running in the running lane, Milazzo still throws it behind[/quote]
Just curious of your thoughts on this play that was called for interference.
https://youtu.be/mwWmVQlOh60?si=qACv5_nIVCmtjqmI
...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:23 pm
[quote]If they are outside of the line after 45 feet while interfering it’s an out[/quote]
Can we find a point to agree upon here? So, you will admit that, by the rule, at the very least the runners path could have been ruled interference?
The hanging point seems to be how we define “interfer...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 1:20 pm
[quote]Wait. So the runner being inside the baseline causes Milazzo to throw it further right? Physics a tough class for you? This should cause Milazzo to yank it left….[/quote]
I honestly never took physics and I probably wouldn’t have done very well if I’m honest. The good news is I was ...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 12:50 pm
[quote]just posted an angle from first showing how open the bag was for the throw[/quote]
Now do the angle of the UF Game…..
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/Wb5Mhtzg/IMG-8384.png[/img]...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 12:49 pm
[quote]The throw went right of the damn bag and the runner was nowhere near it[/quote]
In the words of Hans Landa….”it’s a bingo”.
The throw was off because the runner was inside the baseline, therefore interfering with the throw. It doesn’t have to be a perfect throw to interfere. ...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 12:46 pm
[quote]lot of people still think it should not have been called[/quote]
This is misleading. At the time of this play, all of the announcers were saying they should change the rule, not that by the book it wasn’t interference. Nuanced point but important.
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/Wz9kyfJt/IM...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 12:38 pm
[quote] no interference with the throw or catch has occurred up to this point in time[/quote]
This is proves it was interference and where your argument crumbles to pieces. The runner was well inside the baseline at the time of the throw, clearly interfering. That’s exactly what happened lol ...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 11:00 am
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/6Q9xG1P4/IMG-8384.png[/img]...
re: Someone explain to me how that is not interference
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 10:59 am
[quote]Explain how the runner interfered with the throw?[/quote]
Can you explain how this was interference?
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/6Q9xG1P4/IMG-8384.png[/img]...
re: It’s interference. With visual evidence and the rule
Posted by hall59tiger on 5/11/24 at 10:57 am
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/VNcLZRVz/IMG-8383.png[/img]
[img]https://i.postimg.cc/6Q9xG1P4/IMG-8384.png[/img]
One of these was called interference and the other wasn’t. In the UF game, thatcher actually had a better angle to first and the UF runner was actually closer to the baseline. By the obj...
Popular
28
