Started By
Message

re: Would you be happy with these early-season Eason stats?

Posted on 5/2/17 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Ok, do David Greene 2002


Those Clemson and USCe games were brutal. Shockley saved the Clemson game and Pollack saved the USCe game.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63958 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 5:39 pm to
Accidentally downvoted you.
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63958 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 6:07 pm to
Fixed.
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32855 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Those Clemson and USCe games were brutal. Shockley saved the Clemson game and Pollack saved the USCe game.


Shows the slim differences between starting 0-2 or 2-0. Sometimes not a big difference between 13-1 and 9-4.
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Shows the slim differences between starting 0-2 or 2-0. Sometimes not a big difference between 13-1 and 9-4.


Similar to 2007 and 2012, it took the 2002 team awhile to hit their stride. It seemed like they were just a machine after the Michael Johnson play against Auburn. Didn't play a close game after that.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86467 posts
Posted on 5/2/17 at 7:43 pm to
Yeah that 02 team is one of the 3 or 4 best teams we've ever had and didn't really start rolling until late November.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25594 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 7:23 am to
The running game is much more important than the QB.

Stafford's best wins were on the back of a successful ground game.

He matured as a quarterback as he was walking out the door to the NFL. He might have only had 2 games in his college career where he carried the offense to victory without the ground game to support him (and one of those was the bowl win against Michigan State right before he got the #1 pick).
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
44830 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 8:19 am to
quote:

The running game is much more important than the QB.


Completely disagree. Look at the Vikings. Peterson was always a monster but the team wasn't ever very good until Favre came in.

Barry Sanders was as good as anyone ever but the Lions were never that good because they sucked at QB for most of the last 70 years
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25594 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 8:24 am to
Ok. The running game is far more important in college.

Clemson had 33 rushing TDs.
Bama had 33 the year before.
Ohio State had 41 the year before.
Florida State had 42 the year before.

Throwing the football is secondary to being able to run the football when the other team wants to prevent it. If you throw too much in college, you will pay a price.

There is an efficiency in the NFL that makes it different.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39994 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 10:18 am to
If we're running for 250 yards and 3 tds then those numbers would be fine with me.
Posted by DaveyDownerDawg
2021 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Member since Sep 2012
6619 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 11:57 am to
quote:

Pollack saved the USCe game


That was that mud-bowl game wasn't it....
This post was edited on 5/3/17 at 11:58 am
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
32855 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 12:01 pm to
It had a rain delay, but it wasn't a muddy mess.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter