Would you be happy with these early-season Eason stats?

First of all, I realize the standard response is "I don't care about the stats, as long as we win!" which is fine. For the sake of this hypothetical disregard the record though and just look at stats.

App State:
18/24, 235 yards, 2 TD/0 Int

@Notre Dame:
19/35, 225 yards, 2 TD/2 Int

Samford:
14/20, 175 yards, 2 TD/0 Int

Mississippi State:
19/44, 145 yards, 0 TD/1 Int


What would you think? Would you be clamoring for Fromm at this point, be perfectly content, or stick with him while realizing there's still progress to be made?


FTR, those are Stafford's stats early in his true sophomore season against OSU at home (W), at Alabama (W), Western Carolina at home (W), South Carolina at home (L). I went out of order since it didn't totally jive...We have an easier home opener this year compared to OSU, the first-year-with-saban 5 loss bama team seemed to be a fair road comparison with notre dame, both have a true cupcake, and I put stafford's home SC game with Eason's home MSU game. Not an exact match but you get the point.

I see SO many people say that eason will never be as good as stafford, while those same people only seem to remember stafford going #1 overall and not actually look at what he did on teh field. Their true freshmen seasons aren't really remotely comparable, as Eason blew stafford's stats out of the water. The progression from season 1 to 2 should see major improvement, and Stafford did show improvement (although it should be noted he never once threw for over 240 yards in 07), but still was pretty pedestrian early in 07. In 06 it seemed like everyone knew stafford had unlimited potential, we just needed to be patient while he realized it. I think we should give eason that same luxury.