Started By
Message

TV Revenue vs Hartman Fund

Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:06 am
Posted by RealDawg
Dawgville
Member since Nov 2012
9367 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:06 am
So on the 680 dawg show this am, they said that for the first time the TV money to UGA was greater than Hartman Fund.

That is with Hartman Fund having 2nd largest year ever.

They did say that tickets+Hartman was still greater.

Long term, I would assume schools will seek out the marquis matchups to drive numbers and hope for even more from the TV contracts.

Are there downsides to TV starting to drive the ship even more?
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30541 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Are there downsides to TV starting to drive the ship even more?


Not until CBS wants to make it Verne Lundquist field at Sanford Stadium
Posted by crispyUGA
Upstate SC
Member since Feb 2011
15919 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:13 am to
ESPN will eventually force CBS totally out of it. When it comes time for CBS to renew their contract, ESPN will offer more money than CBS.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
39972 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 10:39 am to
They've already screwed us out of a chance at a natty in 07. They'll keep doing the same thing to other deserving teams.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
30541 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 11:59 am to
That makes sense to me. Papa Disney wants total control
Posted by UGAalum08
Greenville, SC
Member since Aug 2014
944 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:39 pm to
For those looking for specific numbers...

Total payout from the SEC to each school for 2014-2015 was $31.2 million. Hartman donations and ticket revenue are each around $25 million. I couldn't find actual 2015 numbers. Highest donations ever was in 2008 with $29.5 million.


The SEC network likely had a good bit to do with the bump in revenue from the conference...that channel runs 365 days a year and it alone likely contributed $5+ million to each school.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

They've already screwed us out of a chance at a natty in 07


lol
Posted by AlaCowboy
North Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
6941 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

Are there downsides to TV starting to drive the ship even more?



Other than the fact that TV determines game time about 4 days before the game?
Posted by deeprig9
Unincorporated Ozora, Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
63879 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 8:59 pm to
My understanding is that the SEC Network splits the profit with all schools evenly. While 5 schools generate all the profit, they all share equally. Communism, basically. The only difference between this and Communism is that schools can opt out. Any school can walk away. It would hurt them, they wouldn't be in the SEC anymore, but at least they wouldn't be executed, literally. Just figuratively. Nobody would be literally murdered by authority in the town square as a show of power and nationalism. They would just have their reputation smeared and their money taken away.

Also, the SEC Network paid alot out this year, because it's the honeymoon. Their own success depended on how much they paid to the schools. Their book are not open. We don't really know how much they say they made. They may have even lost money this year, with the launch. But they'll never say that.

UGA shouldn't be dumb enough to become dependent on this revenue. The little shite schools will, we shouldn't.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter