Started By
Message

re: Bowl Game Question

Posted on 12/20/15 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by JimDawginTexas
Member since Sep 2012
1538 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 8:15 pm to
Good point
Posted by Jefferson Dawg
Member since Sep 2012
31961 posts
Posted on 12/20/15 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

Mizzou is once again an embarrassment to the SEC. Bowl proceeds are split among the SEC conference members yet Missouri declines their bowl? They should not get their cut as a result if you ask me.


Post of the Year
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58913 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Agree with this. Mizzou is once again an embarrassment to the SEC. Bowl proceeds are split among the SEC conference members yet Missouri declines their bowl? They should not get their cut as a result if you ask me.


I understand what you are saying...but when you get down to the lowest tier bowls the colleges can actually lose money. There would have been nothing to put into the kitty had Missouri gone to a bowl game. The only advantage for them to have gone would have been the extra practice time, and to tell recruits they went to a bowl game.
Posted by GurleyGirl
Georgia
Member since Nov 2015
13164 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 8:06 am to
quote:

I understand what you are saying...but when you get down to the lowest tier bowls the colleges can actually lose money.


I find that hard to believe: LINK

--------------------------------------
Total payouts from 35 postseason games from the 2013-14 season were $309.9 million, while schools spent $97.8 million to participate. For the 2012-13 season, payouts were $300.8 million and expenses were $90.3 million.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58913 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 8:34 am to
quote:

I find that hard to believe: LINK


But the top Bowls pay out as much as 16 million for each team. The smaller ones do not pay out nearly as much. PLUS, Ohio State actually lost money when thye went to the Rose Bowl a couple of years ago.

LINK

Keep in mind the way Conferences handle Bowl games.
Conferences give the schools a certain amount of money to pay for expenses. Typically the bigger the bowl the more money they get. The smaller schools find it difficult to pay for hotels, food, transportation, etc. and stay within the budget the conference gives them. Then, the smaller the bowl the less the payout. Once the school gets the payout, they turn it over to the conference and it si split among the conference members. (MOST conferences handle it this way. This is one reason Notre Dame didn't want to be a part of a conference. the felt they would go to a big bowl every year, and then their money would be diluted by sharing it with other teams)

Smaller schools at smaller conferences just do not fare well in this scenario. Central Michigan expects to lose money on their bowl game, for instance.

LINK /

And perhaps the best article from Bloomberg tells the story best.

LINK

Rutgers University celebrated its 8-4 record last football season with a trip to the St. Petersburg Bowl in Florida. Big East Conference schools got stuck with a $740,000 bill.

The Scarlet Knights’ story isn’t unique in college football. Payouts for all but the biggest bowl games seldom match teams’ expenses, and the rest of the schools in the conference have to subsidize them, according to financial records obtained by Bloomberg News using open records laws.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 8:35 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter