Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/5/15 at 3:54 pm to Hobnail
Not Dan Mullen. That's my expectation.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 3:56 pm to 3rddownonthe8
Gotcha. We are on the same page then. I think the program needs a shot in the arm, but that should come from hiring a competent OC. Pruitt brought great change with him and there was a lot of excitement leading up to this season, we just haven't played well enough on offense to live up to it.
This also supposes that Pruitt will still be here going forward...
This also supposes that Pruitt will still be here going forward...
Posted on 11/5/15 at 4:06 pm to VoxDawg
Since when is he the only option? I certainly never said I wanted Mullen. CMR is not the answer. Mullen probably isn't either. But Richt is not the answer.
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 4:07 pm
Posted on 11/5/15 at 4:09 pm to Hobnail
McGarity leans to Jeremy Foley and former Gator family, to believe reports from today. I believe it was the USA Today article from Dan Wolken.
No, thank you.
No, thank you.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 4:19 pm to VoxDawg
Well yea, that is the stupidest shite I've ever heard. I would think he would have more sense that to ask for strategic hiring advice from our biggest rival. That quote was almost hard to read because it was so stupid.
If Richt and Co are gone then McGarity needs to be too, especially if there is any ounce of truth to that statement.
If Richt and Co are gone then McGarity needs to be too, especially if there is any ounce of truth to that statement.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 4:30 pm to Hobnail
Consistency. Is that too much to ask for? No reason we shoulda loss to SC and FLA last year. No reason we should be where are are now with the talent and coin we have. Just spit balling
Posted on 11/5/15 at 4:47 pm to Charlestondawg
quote:
Consistency.
Richt is very, very consistent - almost the epitome of consistency. Where he's good, he's consistently good. Where he's bad, he's consistently bad.
The problem is mostly one of stagnation; he just can't fix the stuff that doesn't work well.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 5:03 pm to DragginFly
At this point I'll start with a Touchdown and work up from there.....
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:05 pm to AlaCowboy
quote:
SEC title by year 3
Hilarious,how in the world is that gonna happen?Our '13 class is turned into on of the worst in the modern era and this upcoming class will also take a huge hit if we make a change.Once again,prepare for a nose dive into irrelevancy for at least 2 probably 3 years
Guys,this ain't the UF situation where Muschamp had recruiting classes in the top 5 in '12 and '13 and a top 10 in '14. McElwain was handed a LOADED roster.
We're gonna lack talent AND numbers for whoever takes the job if a change is made.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:08 pm to DawgsLife
quote:
quote:
If you ask any of our rivals about Richt (sans Tech), they will say keep him forever.
Auburn? Tennessee?
Yep, they fear a much better UGA.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:08 pm to RD Dawg
(no message)
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:09 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
We're gonna lack talent AND numbers for whoever takes the job if a change is made.
So what you're saying is nothing will change?
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:14 pm to 3rddownonthe8
quote:
I have no interest in blowing up the program and losing this years recruiting class; setting us back more years.
Its doubtful this would happen.
quote:
have an understanding with CMR , that UGA expects to be in the playoffs and winning the SEC by 2018; if he can't get it done, then its time to blow it up.
We already did this way back in 2010.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:15 pm to WorkinDawg
quote:
nothing will change
On the recruiting trail ALOT has changed.Our '14 and '15 classes were very strong and our '16 was expected to be better than either.
Are you saying we lacked talent in '14?Or the '15 recruiting class lacks talent?
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:25 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
We're gonna lack talent AND numbers for whoever takes the job if a change is made.
We didnt lack numbers in 2001, so why would we now?
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:27 pm to DragginFly
My expectations are less embarrassing losses and more "putting away" of teams we should "put away." A different mindset.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:02 pm to djsdawg
quote:
We didn't lack numbers in 2001 so why would we now
Huh?WTF does 2001 roster have to do with this roster?
Go ahead,look at the 2001 roster and you'll see LOADS of
upcoming NFL talent.
Since you're obviusly to lazy to do so,here is a few names.Charles Grant,Will Witherspoon,Sean Jones,Boss Bailey,Tony Gilbert,David Pollack,Jonathan
Sullian,Jermaine Philips,Tim Wansley,David Green and Jon Stinchcomb .
If you think our roster in '16 comes close to this group you're gonna be extremely disappointed.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:12 pm to RD Dawg
You implied a coaching change would lead to roster talent issues, but Donnan left a loaded roster for the next coach, and Zook did the same for Urban. I guess you are acknowledging that Richt failed to load the roster up properly, and based upon our results this year, I cant argue against that.
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:16 pm to DragginFly
tommy tuberville or phil fulmer for me
Page 2 of 12
Latest Georgia News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News