Started By
Message
re: MSU QB commit 3* Elijah Staley dismissed from HS team
Posted on 10/13/13 at 6:36 pm to Whereisomaha
Posted on 10/13/13 at 6:36 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
That's the second time you've said that and for the second time, I did not watch the AU MSU game, so how would I know he sucked?
If you didn't know what was going on, why did you imply he played bad in that game to start this whole argument?
This post was edited on 10/13/13 at 6:37 pm
Posted on 10/13/13 at 9:50 pm to engie
So me saying he didn't make Auburn's arse quit = he sucked? Thanks for proving I never said he sucked. Maybe now you won't have a need to say I did for a third time. You need a woman
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:45 pm to Whereisomaha
Update on another "totally logical" WiO argument:
Dak Prescott - 64 rushes for 457 yds and 8 TDs. 7.14 ypa
career - 96 rushes for 575yds and 12 TDs. 5.99 ypa
Barry Brunetti - 32 rushes for 169 yds and 3 TDs. 5.28 ypa
career - 126 rushes for 560yds and 6 TDs. 4.44 ypa
Dak Prescott - 64 rushes for 457 yds and 8 TDs. 7.14 ypa
career - 96 rushes for 575yds and 12 TDs. 5.99 ypa
Barry Brunetti - 32 rushes for 169 yds and 3 TDs. 5.28 ypa
career - 126 rushes for 560yds and 6 TDs. 4.44 ypa
Posted on 10/14/13 at 3:52 pm to engie
JFF: 66 rushes 427 yards 6.5 YPC.
So using your logic Dak is a better runner than Manziel. Idiot
So using your logic Dak is a better runner than Manziel. Idiot
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:26 pm to Whereisomaha
quote:
Dak Prescott - 64 rushes for 457 yds and 8 TDs. 7.14 ypa
quote:
JFF: 66 rushes 427 yards 6.5 YPC.
The numbers would suggest that, this year, up to this point, Dak Prescott is indeed a better runner than JFF.
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:45 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
The numbers would suggest that, this year, up to this point, Dak Prescott is indeed a better runner than JFF.
Outside of the numbers restricted solely to this year, do you believe that Dak Prescott is a better runner than Johnny Manziel?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:50 pm to dtmb
This thread just went full retard
Posted on 10/14/13 at 4:58 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
The numbers would suggest that, this year, up to this point, Dak Prescott is indeed a better runner than JFF.
And that is why it is stupid to decifer who is a better running QB based on stats
Posted on 10/14/13 at 6:53 pm to DynastyDawg
quote:
The numbers would suggest that, this year, up to this point, Dak Prescott is indeed a better runner than JFF.
Please tell me you aren't that stupid
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:38 pm to Whereisomaha
Your back pedaling is comical.
Was "stats" not what you initially spewed in trying to say Brunetti was better than Dak? So, what gives?
Basically, Dak compared to Brunetti is laughable -- and it's why I LOL'ed when you prodded it. Literally everyone here can see that. How many games did it take for him to surpass Brunetti's CAREER production again?
It's OK to admit that you made a rash, ridiculous argument on a QB that you had never really watched play and was proven incorrect. Thus allowing everyone to move on.
Otherwise, I guess I'll be forced to keep bumping this every week so the comedy can be relived. Again -- and again -- and again.
Was "stats" not what you initially spewed in trying to say Brunetti was better than Dak? So, what gives?
Basically, Dak compared to Brunetti is laughable -- and it's why I LOL'ed when you prodded it. Literally everyone here can see that. How many games did it take for him to surpass Brunetti's CAREER production again?
It's OK to admit that you made a rash, ridiculous argument on a QB that you had never really watched play and was proven incorrect. Thus allowing everyone to move on.
Otherwise, I guess I'll be forced to keep bumping this every week so the comedy can be relived. Again -- and again -- and again.
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:44 pm to engie
It's like you're sucking your own dick
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:48 pm to sorantable
quote:
It's like you're sucking your own dick
Is that somehow similar to the circlejerk ya'll threw that one time I actually lost an argument with WiO?
This post was edited on 10/14/13 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 10/14/13 at 7:52 pm to sorantable
It'd be nifty if we could talk about the actual topic instead of our back-ups QBs. Does Staley still have an offer?
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:14 pm to engie
quote:
Is that somehow similar to the circlejerk ya'll threw that one time I actually lost an argument with WiO?
Somewhat
Posted on 10/14/13 at 8:19 pm to Quicksilver
Yes he is the next DAK Prescott. So pretty much we are fricked
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:22 pm to engie
quote:
Basically, Dak compared to Brunetti is laughable
that's what we've been trying to tell you. Glad that you've finally come around.
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:31 pm to engie
quote:
Basically, Dak compared to Brunetti is laughable -- and it's why I LOL'ed when you prodded it. Literally everyone here can see that. How many games did it take for him to surpass Brunetti's CAREER production again?
It's OK to admit that you made a rash, ridiculous argument on a QB that you had never really watched play and was proven incorrect. Thus allowing everyone to move on.
Otherwise, I guess I'll be forced to keep bumping this every week so the comedy can be relived. Again -- and again -- and again.
I've got no problem admitting I'm wrong, it makes you more objective doing so, but Barry is just as thick, faster and quicker than Dak. That's what eyes tell you. Same as eyes tell you Manziel is a better runner than Dak, yet you say you will continue to bump this retarded thread pointing out a stat comparison that I just proved was irrelevant.
And no, not everyone agrees with you. State fans think Dak is a better runner, OM fans think Barry is.
This post was edited on 10/15/13 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:47 pm to Whereisomaha
I just read somewhere that all of MSU commits combine with 15 sec offers. That is with Gerri greens five...... Excluding MSU offers of course.
Posted on 10/15/13 at 2:49 pm to Landsharks
Moffan like Rihanna with those diamonds
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News