Started By
Message
re: Your team's record vs the AQ conferences?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:28 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:28 pm to Damn Good Dawg
I'm not playing this game. 
0
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:28 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
Nice, guys. ToG, you went balls to the walls on your analysis
I'm chillin' with a pitcher of Bloody Mary's and a platter of BLT's right now.
Sorry for not working harder...
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:28 pm to Alahunter
Nice 
I think it's also cool to see how each team schedule by their region. LSU has a ton of SWC/Big 12 teams while USCe and UGA have a ton vs the ACC. Bama seems to have a lean toward ACC but also a good many games vs the big 12/SWC
ETA:
I was being serious, man, you have all the old conferences and everything
And now I'd kill for a bloody mary that's more tobasco than zing zang
I think it's also cool to see how each team schedule by their region. LSU has a ton of SWC/Big 12 teams while USCe and UGA have a ton vs the ACC. Bama seems to have a lean toward ACC but also a good many games vs the big 12/SWC
ETA:
quote:
ToG
I was being serious, man, you have all the old conferences and everything
And now I'd kill for a bloody mary that's more tobasco than zing zang
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:30 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:29 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Were 351-291. The inclusion of UH and SMU in the AAC helps us a lot
247-197 vs Big 12
11-13 vs ACC
11-22 vs Big ten
68-44 vs AAC
14-15 vs PAC
247-197 vs Big 12
11-13 vs ACC
11-22 vs Big ten
68-44 vs AAC
14-15 vs PAC
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:29 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
Is there a way to do this on Stassen?
There's a basic one but it only shows records against current conferences. It would be more painful to calculate TAMU's.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:30 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
That it does but even with the AAC and Big 12, damn, yall played a lot of OOC. UGA had a shite load vs the ACC and some vs the Big 12/SWC but relatively few vs the rest. Aggy seems to be pretty varied.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:31 pm to KSGamecock
quote:
There's a basic one but it only shows records against current conferences. It would be more painful to calculate TAMU's.
...well frick me.
And my numbers are all different from this 'un considering all the conference changes. Going off of Stassen UGA since 1920 is...
ACC: 103-33-9
PAC 12: 10-4-1
B1G: 9-4-0
Big 12: 5-3-0
SWC: 14-9-0
SEC: 342-229-16
Big East: 0-2 (wtf)
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:32 pm to Damn Good Dawg
American 65-44-3
Cincinnati 0-1
Houston 19-12-3
Memphis 2-0
SMU 44-29-7
Temple 0-2
ACC 13-15
Boston College 1-3
Clemson 3-1
Duke 1-0
Florida State 0-4
Georgia Tech 1-1
Louisville 3-0
Miami 1-2
Pittsburgh 1-2
VPI 2-2
Big Ten 13-22
Illinois 2-0
Iowa 1-0
Maryland 2-0
Michigan 1-2
Michigan State 1-2
Nebraska 4-10
Northwestern 1-0
Ohio State 0-4
Penn State 1-3
Purdue 0-1
Big 12 253-207-22
Baylor 68-31-9 (frick you FRAN)
Iowa State 10-1 (frick you FRAN)
Kansas 9-2 (again frick you FRAN)
Kansas State 8-7
Oklahoma 11-19
Oklahoma State 17-10
TCU 56-29-7
Texas 37-76-5
Texas Tech 37-32-1
PAC 12 14-14
Arizona 1-0
California 1-1
Colorado 3-6
Stanford 1-0
USC 0-3
UCLA 2-2
Utah 2-1
Washington 2-1
Washington State 2-0
Cincinnati 0-1
Houston 19-12-3
Memphis 2-0
SMU 44-29-7
Temple 0-2
ACC 13-15
Boston College 1-3
Clemson 3-1
Duke 1-0
Florida State 0-4
Georgia Tech 1-1
Louisville 3-0
Miami 1-2
Pittsburgh 1-2
VPI 2-2
Big Ten 13-22
Illinois 2-0
Iowa 1-0
Maryland 2-0
Michigan 1-2
Michigan State 1-2
Nebraska 4-10
Northwestern 1-0
Ohio State 0-4
Penn State 1-3
Purdue 0-1
Big 12 253-207-22
Baylor 68-31-9 (frick you FRAN)
Iowa State 10-1 (frick you FRAN)
Kansas 9-2 (again frick you FRAN)
Kansas State 8-7
Oklahoma 11-19
Oklahoma State 17-10
TCU 56-29-7
Texas 37-76-5
Texas Tech 37-32-1
PAC 12 14-14
Arizona 1-0
California 1-1
Colorado 3-6
Stanford 1-0
USC 0-3
UCLA 2-2
Utah 2-1
Washington 2-1
Washington State 2-0
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:33 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Between the SWC and the Big 12 we've been conference mates with a team in every AQ conference except the ACC that's why I was reluctant to do it at first.
that's why I was reluctant to do it at first.Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:33 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Don't worry about it if it's different. There are problems with Stassen's but it's good for a quick look.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:35 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I went off Stassen but looking at it now they have different records for us than some of yours and I know some of theirs are wrong, like Baylors. Yours is probably more accurate than mine
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:36 pm to KSGamecock
Yea, I like mine but I went ahead and listed what Stassen said too. Cause, I mean, how could I leave off the B1G team Chicago?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:40 pm to ShaneTheLegLechler
I went straight from the aggie athletics website.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:43 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
Yeah I think Stassen eliminates "vacated" wins or something. I also went off last years conferences by accident
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:46 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
I went straight from the aggie athletics website.
That's what I did
quote:
Shane
That's cool, I didn't realize the SWC and Big 12 had partnerships. I feel like the SEC has always just schedule regionally
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:52 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Yeah we have played a lot of ACC teams OOC. We did series with Clemson and Va Tech in the early 2000s and played FSU a couple times in the 90s I believe.
We also were in the the Big 12 with Colorado and Nebraska which jacks up with PAC and B1G records as well. Then TCU joined the Big 12 which skewed that more since they were in the SWC. And we played OU and some of the old Big 8 schools OOC quite a bit before the Big 12 existed as well I believe. We've been a part of some fricked up conferences and partnerships
We also were in the the Big 12 with Colorado and Nebraska which jacks up with PAC and B1G records as well. Then TCU joined the Big 12 which skewed that more since they were in the SWC. And we played OU and some of the old Big 8 schools OOC quite a bit before the Big 12 existed as well I believe. We've been a part of some fricked up conferences and partnerships
This post was edited on 3/25/14 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:54 pm to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
ToG
I was being serious, man, you have all the old conferences and everything
My bad, I blame the alcohol. But it's not like I had to go far or anything. I got all that from the LSU link on the Tiger Rant. I just copied and pasted.
[reaches for another BLT]
Posted on 3/25/14 at 5:57 pm to TigersOfGeauxld
quote:
Shane
See, this is why I thought this thread could be cool. Outside of knowing how each team has fared it just shows who they have experience with and as you have pointed out it seems A&M are all over the place
quote:
TigersOfGeauxld
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:03 pm to Damn Good Dawg
Yeah and we have extensive series history with Rice LSU and Arkansas also, and a pretty good number of games vs Mizzou (like 16 or 17 I think). If you include the SEC It will look even crazier 10-15 years from now once we have a larger sample for all the other SEC West schools
Posted on 3/25/14 at 6:03 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Now take out GT and Clemson.
So essentially take out the two best records and it doesn't look as good? Shocker
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News