Started By
Message
re: Your school's football point differential over its entire history
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:47 pm to Tiger Live2
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:47 pm to Tiger Live2
quote:
May wanna rethink that.
try to keep up please.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:43 pm to spacewrangler
Big 6 all-time stats:
Number of games vs. other Big 6 members:
1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251
Winning Percentage against other Big 6 members:
1. Alabama- 59.1%
2. Auburn- 49.7%
3. Georgia- 49.1%
4. Florida- 47.9%
5. Tennessee- 47.4%
6. LSU- 44.0%
Based on these numbers we may want to reconsider the motion to instead eliminate LSU from Big 6 membership
Number of games vs. other Big 6 members:
1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251
Winning Percentage against other Big 6 members:
1. Alabama- 59.1%
2. Auburn- 49.7%
3. Georgia- 49.1%
4. Florida- 47.9%
5. Tennessee- 47.4%
6. LSU- 44.0%
Based on these numbers we may want to reconsider the motion to instead eliminate LSU from Big 6 membership
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:50 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
1. Alabama (+5,354)
6. Auburn (+533)
So we are 10 times better than Auburn in SEC play. Got it.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:52 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
BHMKyle
Tiger n Miami has spent this entire thread looking foolish, please don't try to dethrone him.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:01 pm to Tuscaloosa
quote:
12. Kentucky (+2,179)
13. South Carolina (+1,221)
14. Mississippi State (+1,033)
Not last.
quote:
13. Kentucky (-4,250)
14. Vanderbilt (-5,770)
Not last.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:02 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Tiger n Miami has spent this entire thread looking foolish, please don't try to dethrone him.
How is stating relevant facts foolish? Facts are facts. Obviously Alabama's statistics look the most impressive. After that its fairly even, but LSU's history against the Big 6 is pretty dismal.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:11 pm to Tuscaloosa
Damn, LSU has scored a shite ton since the year 2000
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to BHMKyle
GD right. And TiM spent the whole thread owning frickers actually.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251
This seems inaccurate, link please?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
How is stating relevant facts foolish? Facts are facts.
I mean, I understand what facts are. What do winning percentages have to do with a point differential thread?
All that aside, if LSU is removed from Big 6, then that we have no reason to be included either.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:15 pm to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
TiM spent the whole thread owning frickers actually.
you repeatedly saying how auburn has "big brass balls" doesn't mean you owned anybody.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:21 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
quote:
1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251
This seems inaccurate, link please?
Go to each school's media guide and add them up. It's not hard.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:28 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
I mean, I understand what facts are. What do winning percentages have to do with a point differential thread?
All that aside, if LSU is removed from Big 6, then that we have no reason to be included either.
The thread may have started out as a point differential discussion, but 90% of the posts consider strength of schedule. And most of the discussion revolves around the Big 6.
Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia. One might ponder if their apparent easy conference schedule has led to some of the perceived success. That is all I'm saying.
It appears LSU has played far more conference games against non-Big 6 members than any of the others.
Georgia ha played nearly 100 additional games against other Big 6 opponents compared to LSU. Can you imagine what our record would be if we had played 100 less games against top tier teams?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:30 pm to GIbson05
Big brother 10 x better in state of Alabama and Mississippi than little brother
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:35 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
The thread may have started out as a point differential discussion, but 90% of the posts consider strength of schedule. And most of the discussion revolves around the Big 6.
Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia. One might ponder if their apparent easy conference schedule has led to some of the perceived success. That is all I'm saying.
It appears LSU has played far more conference games against non-Big 6 members than any of the others.
Georgia ha played nearly 100 additional games against other Big 6 opponents compared to LSU. Can you imagine what our record would be if we had played 100 less games against top tier teams?
Can you imagine our record if we played 100 more games agains Vandy, Kentucky and South Carolina?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:42 pm to BHMKyle
quote:
Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia.
So you are saying LSU should lose their status, and then say LSU is basically UGA plus a couple recent MNC's? But UGA shouldn't lose big 6 status?
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:51 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
1. Alabama (+5,354)
2. Tennessee (+2,958)
3. Georgia (+2,312)
4. Florida (+2,099)
5. LSU (+2,027)
6. Auburn (+533)
7. Texas A&M ('12-'14) (+90)
8. Missouri ('12-'14) (+83)
9. Ole Miss (-288)
10. Arkansas ('92-'14) (-315)
11. South Carolina ('92-'14)(-521) 12. Mississippi State (-3,393)
13. Kentucky (-4,250)
14. Vanderbilt (-5,770)
A&M's +90 including 59-0 lol... That game was such an abortion.
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:55 pm to craigbiggio
I think he's saying you did. Or some other terrible teams.
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:08 pm to TrueReb13
quote:
Big brother 10 x better in state of Alabama and Mississippi than little brother
There is no "Big Brother" in the state of Mississippi.
The Magnolia State is nothing but a set of deformed twin brothers with stunted growth, with one of them dressing just a little sharper than the other.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News