Started By
Message

re: Your school's football point differential over its entire history

Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:47 pm to
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86474 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

May wanna rethink that.


try to keep up please.
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:43 pm to
Big 6 all-time stats:

Number of games vs. other Big 6 members:

1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251

Winning Percentage against other Big 6 members:

1. Alabama- 59.1%
2. Auburn- 49.7%
3. Georgia- 49.1%
4. Florida- 47.9%
5. Tennessee- 47.4%
6. LSU- 44.0%

Based on these numbers we may want to reconsider the motion to instead eliminate LSU from Big 6 membership
Posted by GIbson05
Member since Feb 2009
4292 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

1. Alabama (+5,354)
6. Auburn (+533)

So we are 10 times better than Auburn in SEC play. Got it.
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

BHMKyle


Tiger n Miami has spent this entire thread looking foolish, please don't try to dethrone him.
Posted by JDHLaw
Member since Jun 2013
1040 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

12. Kentucky (+2,179)
13. South Carolina (+1,221)
14. Mississippi State (+1,033)


Not last.

quote:


13. Kentucky (-4,250)
14. Vanderbilt (-5,770)



Not last.

Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Tiger n Miami has spent this entire thread looking foolish, please don't try to dethrone him.


How is stating relevant facts foolish? Facts are facts. Obviously Alabama's statistics look the most impressive. After that its fairly even, but LSU's history against the Big 6 is pretty dismal.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123621 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:11 pm to
Damn, LSU has scored a shite ton since the year 2000
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to
GD right. And TiM spent the whole thread owning frickers actually.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69908 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251




This seems inaccurate, link please?
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

How is stating relevant facts foolish? Facts are facts.


I mean, I understand what facts are. What do winning percentages have to do with a point differential thread?

All that aside, if LSU is removed from Big 6, then that we have no reason to be included either.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86474 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

TiM spent the whole thread owning frickers actually.


you repeatedly saying how auburn has "big brass balls" doesn't mean you owned anybody.
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

quote:
1. Auburn- 381
2. Alabama- 356
3. Georgia- 349
4. Florida- 316
5. Tennessee- 267
6. LSU- 251




This seems inaccurate, link please?


Go to each school's media guide and add them up. It's not hard.
Posted by TrueReb13
Member since Feb 2015
1623 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:22 pm to
MSU sucks
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

I mean, I understand what facts are. What do winning percentages have to do with a point differential thread?

All that aside, if LSU is removed from Big 6, then that we have no reason to be included either.



The thread may have started out as a point differential discussion, but 90% of the posts consider strength of schedule. And most of the discussion revolves around the Big 6.


Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia. One might ponder if their apparent easy conference schedule has led to some of the perceived success. That is all I'm saying.

It appears LSU has played far more conference games against non-Big 6 members than any of the others.

Georgia ha played nearly 100 additional games against other Big 6 opponents compared to LSU. Can you imagine what our record would be if we had played 100 less games against top tier teams?
Posted by TrueReb13
Member since Feb 2015
1623 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:30 pm to


Big brother 10 x better in state of Alabama and Mississippi than little brother
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

The thread may have started out as a point differential discussion, but 90% of the posts consider strength of schedule. And most of the discussion revolves around the Big 6.


Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia. One might ponder if their apparent easy conference schedule has led to some of the perceived success. That is all I'm saying.

It appears LSU has played far more conference games against non-Big 6 members than any of the others.

Georgia ha played nearly 100 additional games against other Big 6 opponents compared to LSU. Can you imagine what our record would be if we had played 100 less games against top tier teams?


Can you imagine our record if we played 100 more games agains Vandy, Kentucky and South Carolina?
Posted by ATLdawg25
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2014
4370 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

Why would UGA lose our Big 6 status if LSU did? Sure, LSU had some great years that produced two national titles between 2003 and 2007. Aside from that though, they are Georgia.


So you are saying LSU should lose their status, and then say LSU is basically UGA plus a couple recent MNC's? But UGA shouldn't lose big 6 status?



Posted by Nguyening
SEMO
Member since Jun 2013
9057 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

1. Alabama (+5,354)
2. Tennessee (+2,958)
3. Georgia (+2,312)
4. Florida (+2,099)
5. LSU (+2,027)
6. Auburn (+533)
7. Texas A&M ('12-'14) (+90)
8. Missouri ('12-'14) (+83)
9. Ole Miss (-288)
10. Arkansas ('92-'14) (-315)
11. South Carolina ('92-'14)(-521) 12. Mississippi State (-3,393)
13. Kentucky (-4,250)
14. Vanderbilt (-5,770)


A&M's +90 including 59-0 lol... That game was such an abortion.
This post was edited on 7/6/15 at 3:54 pm
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 3:55 pm to
I think he's saying you did. Or some other terrible teams.
Posted by BHMKyle
Birmingham, AL
Member since Feb 2013
5076 posts
Posted on 7/6/15 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Big brother 10 x better in state of Alabama and Mississippi than little brother


There is no "Big Brother" in the state of Mississippi.

The Magnolia State is nothing but a set of deformed twin brothers with stunted growth, with one of them dressing just a little sharper than the other.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter