Started By
Message
3
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:23 am to therick711
How about UGA ? No matter what the fans who don't like him think they will be in a lot of hurt without him.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:26 am to TroyTider
It's a toss up between Rivers who would likely throw a good bit of picks and Bolden who is not a very good qb to begin with
We'd probably go 10-2 w/o mett this year just because of our defense though
We'd probably go 10-2 w/o mett this year just because of our defense though
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:27 am to keene
The team that relies most heavily on their passing game and can't lean on their running game in the event of an injury. That rules out alabama and lsu, though both would be screwed. The answer is either georgia or tennessee
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:29 am to therick711
All of our QBs have little to no game experience. If the likely starter, Showers, goes down, how screwed are we? Don't really know since there really isn't a way to know how good Showers is until after a few games. They are all talented, but that doesn't always mean they can run an offense.
Jameill Showers QB 6-2 219 So. (only has thrown around five passes in a real game)
Johnny Manziel QB 6-1 200 RS Fr.
Matt Joeckel QB 6-4 234 So.
Matt Davis QB 6-2 206 True Fr.
More than likely we are going to have a pretty hard time at QB until the expreience level goes up. One good thing is the large amount of short passes that we will likely throw.
Jameill Showers QB 6-2 219 So. (only has thrown around five passes in a real game)
Johnny Manziel QB 6-1 200 RS Fr.
Matt Joeckel QB 6-4 234 So.
Matt Davis QB 6-2 206 True Fr.
More than likely we are going to have a pretty hard time at QB until the expreience level goes up. One good thing is the large amount of short passes that we will likely throw.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:37 am to joe.liberst
bama is F'd if he has to start
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:40 am to keene
We'd probably be the team least affected by it. Hutson Mason is more than capable.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:44 am to Damn Good Dawg
quote:
We'd probably be the team least affected by it. Hutson Mason is more than capable.
So that means Murray is not very good after all.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 10:48 am to BloodSweat&Beers
Better than most this conferences garbage QBs not named Tyler Wilson. Still a guido though
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:03 am to TroyTider
I would have to say LSU. After all the hype surrounding Mett, it would be a huge letdown if they had to start a no-name freshman at qb. I don't care how good their defense is, you still need a good field general to be assertive in the huddle and manage the offense, especially with LSU's schedule.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 11:20 am to therick711
quote:
we havent had one since 2003, so pretty much no change
Already turning on Jevan?
The most overrated QB in SEC history? We needed each other more than we realized. If he had stayed, and been a team leader, he may have gotten drafted. And the program may not have fallen apart so bad. Bottom line: There was no leadership from the top down. It was a perfect opportunity for the team QB to step up and show us all something. But its all over now...
Posted on 8/3/12 at 5:44 pm to No Colors
Wilson is pretty much indestructable...if he didnt get hurt against bama and a&m he never will 
But im not even sure who our backup would be. Brandon Mitchell would be a good zone read QB and is a great athlete but he's splitting time at WR. Brandon Allen is our QB of the future but he's a RS freshman. So i could agree with us. At least we'd still have Knile.
But im not even sure who our backup would be. Brandon Mitchell would be a good zone read QB and is a great athlete but he's splitting time at WR. Brandon Allen is our QB of the future but he's a RS freshman. So i could agree with us. At least we'd still have Knile.
This post was edited on 8/3/12 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 8/3/12 at 5:54 pm to TroyTider
Arkansas, UGA, Tennessee
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:01 pm to IrvingAg13
Richt and Bobo may have some issues but developing qbs is not one of them
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:03 pm to RebelNutt
quote:
Not us, we are screwed anyway!
nice, atleast your realistic
Some will say LSU but I don't think so, after all the Tigers went 13-1. Won the SEC and played for it all without a QB last year, and beat the national champions in their house.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:22 pm to volfan30
quote:
We are fricked if Braysus gets hurt.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:26 pm to gohogs141
quote:
Wilson is pretty much indestructable...if he didnt get hurt against bama and a&m he never will
This is true. We beat the ever living shite out of him and he just kept going. To quote the Russian from Rocky IV, "he's like a piece of iron."
Posted on 8/3/12 at 6:37 pm to Damn Good Dawg
We have pretty considerable depth with Mason and LeMay but I still think Murray is pretty valuable to the offense. Mason hasn't had any real meaningful experience so he could be another Joe Cox for all we know, and LeMay has never played a down.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 7:31 pm to dawgdayafternoon
I think that some in the SEC are going to be unpleasantly surprised by the UGA run game this year. I am very excited for Malcome/Samuel/Marshall/Gurley to get going. Not to mention I think Quayvon Hicks is going to make LBers his bitch very soon.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 7:35 pm to TroyTider
I would almost say Bama but, unless their offense has changed A LOT under the new coordinator, their offense doesn't really depend a lot on a great QB anyway.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News