Started By
Message
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:36 pm to KillianRussell
quote:
In and of itself the "rings" are not a fair measuring stick in an all time equation.
depends on who you're measuring. Measuring saban at bama/lsu with spurrier at florida is fair. Im not comparing Saban with those coaches using national titles. im comparing him with spurrier at florida.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:36 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
Im good with Miles, thanks though
NOOOO!!! U SO DUM AND JEALOUS!!!
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:37 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
and an sec that was weaker than today's SEC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Did you miss the part where you said that?
yes. because you still have to play SEC games before you go to national championship. Spurrier didnt have but two one loss seasons. Saban has two of those plus an undefeated season in two fewer seasons at two different places.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:38 pm to stapuffmarshy
quote:
Saban is a fine coach
Miles is a fine coach
Im good with Miles, thanks though
:beentheredonethat:
This.
Miles has won here more than Saban did anyway.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:38 pm to Choctaw
A better question is would Saban TRADE his fanbase at Bama for someone else's......
Ummmm.......huh
Ummmm.......huh
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:38 pm to Rebelgator
quote:
In all fairness a coach at an Alabama, Ohio State, USC does have an advantage over a coach at out of the way west Texas & Boise or East Lansing Michigan.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:42 pm to secfan123
Saban rings gained in this era have value, in an all time equation how the rings were rewarded was subjective and limited thanks to Bowl ties ins
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:43 pm to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
Miles has won here more than Saban did anyway
and frankly he's a better person away from the field, means something to ME, maybe not others but matters to me
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:43 pm to lsusteve1
No he wouldn't cause he loves being idolized..
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:44 pm to KillianRussell
quote:
Saban rings gained in this era have value, in an all time equation how the rings were rewarded was subjective and limited thanks to Bowl ties ins
Spurrier was not limited in his rings because of bowl tie inns or bad luck. He was limited because of losing two or more games in every year but two. The two he lost one game he got his chance at a natty.
Im not comparing to joe pa or anyone else. just spurrier.
This post was edited on 4/18/12 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:45 pm to LOCO5150
Saban will be considered the best because he raised two programs from the grave to the championship game quickly, I would rate him no lower had he lost the title game and not got the rings
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:46 pm to TT9
quote:
No he wouldn't cause he loves being idolized..
I'd say most to a "creepy" level......
But ok
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:46 pm to secfan123
Spurrier is one of the most overrated coaches out there, All that talent out there, and he only managed one title. And he needed a mulligan for that one.
Posted on 4/18/12 at 1:46 pm to lsusteve1
I would agree,but I don't think it bothers him at all...
Posted on 4/18/12 at 2:20 pm to TT9
quote:
I would agree,but I don't think it bothers him at all
In some ways....I'd have to agree
Posted on 4/18/12 at 2:24 pm to Itreallydoesmatter
quote:
Would You TRADE Your Current Coach for Saban?
Yes
Posted on 4/18/12 at 2:25 pm to Itreallydoesmatter
Nah. It's much more fun to try and beat him.
And plus, if we had Saban and Alabama managed to beat us with Miles, I'd want to kill myself (much like I'm sure every Alabama fan does when it happens to them).
And plus, if we had Saban and Alabama managed to beat us with Miles, I'd want to kill myself (much like I'm sure every Alabama fan does when it happens to them).
This post was edited on 4/18/12 at 2:26 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News