Started By
Message
re: Would Texas A&M be undefeated in the Big 12 this year?
Posted on 11/2/12 at 10:42 am to CGSC Lobotomy
Posted on 11/2/12 at 10:42 am to CGSC Lobotomy
quote:
IF Justin Tucker doesn't make that FG, is Mike Sherman still the head coach?
Most likely but I am glad he made it. Although we could have won the fricking game
This post was edited on 11/2/12 at 10:43 am
0
Posted on 11/2/12 at 10:44 am to J Murdah
quote:
Losses to K-State and Baylor.
JFF might put up 700 total yards of offense on that defense
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:02 am to shanklin12
quote:
JFF might put up 700 total yards of offense on that defense
JFF would shred the Big 12. JFF loses 4 in the SEC.
This post was edited on 11/2/12 at 11:35 am
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:13 am to sharpSee
quote:
JFF goes loses 4 in the SEC.
Translate please...
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:17 am to sharpSee
quote:
Would Texas A&M be undefeated in the Big 12 this year?
doesn't matterPosted on 11/2/12 at 11:35 am to Tridentds
quote:
Translate please...
Fixed
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:37 am to sharpSee
quote:
Would Texas A&M be undefeated in the Big 12 this year?
Probably not. I could easily see losses to Kansas St., TT, OU, Texas and Okie St. Not saying they would lose all of those games but easily 2 of them.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:40 am to J Murdah
quote:
No. Losses to K-State and Baylor.
good lord
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:49 am to leoj
Wait, are some in this thread saying TCU and WVU "might" beat A&M? TCU barely beat Kansas even with their QB, and WVU has had an embarrassment of a season so far. I don't care if WVU is technically ranked or not, they suck and were highly overrated. We are talking about a MWC and Big East team playing in a BCS conference.
The Big 12 has 3 teams who are truly top 25 teams; KSU, OU, TT. Whether we won some or all of those games probably depends on where the game was played. All are at worst 50/50 at Kyle.
The Big 12 has 3 teams who are truly top 25 teams; KSU, OU, TT. Whether we won some or all of those games probably depends on where the game was played. All are at worst 50/50 at Kyle.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:51 am to leoj
My alternate reality upset of the year.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 11:52 am to texasaggie08
Look at you talking down to the Big12. Yall havent even been in the SEC a whole year.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:05 pm to texasaggie08
quote:
The Big 12 has 3 teams who are truly top 25 teams; KSU, OU, TT. Whether we won some or all of those games probably depends on where the game was played. All are at worst 50/50 at Kyle.
All 3 would be at Kyle as all 3 were on the road last year.
The Baylor comment was funny. A&M smoked Baylor the last 2 years WITH RGIII but yet now Baylor would beat A&M in spite of a winless Big 12 record? Sure.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:09 pm to J Murdah
We probably would have beat KSU and OU at home but lose to OSU on the road.
Do not really care because we are now in the SEC.
However, the only schools in the Big 12 that get favors are OU and Texas. If there are 3 undefeated teams at the end of this year and KSU is one of them; they will get the shaft. No way it would happen to OU or Texas but all the other schools are out of luck.
Do not really care because we are now in the SEC.
However, the only schools in the Big 12 that get favors are OU and Texas. If there are 3 undefeated teams at the end of this year and KSU is one of them; they will get the shaft. No way it would happen to OU or Texas but all the other schools are out of luck.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:22 pm to J Murdah
quote:
No. Losses to K-State and Baylor.
Pshhhh.... A&M has lost twice to Baylor in the past 30 years. A&M beat Baylor the last two years even though Baylor had RGIII. Baylor's garbage this year.
A&M would lose to K-State, but would destroy Baylor.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:25 pm to sharpSee
The Aggie move to the SEC was brilliant, emphasized by this discussion. By virtue of being in the Southeastern Conference they have became significantly more relevant in the larger topic of college football. The stage is bigger and they have gained a stronger identity and brand enhancement away from Longhorn dominance in the media spotlight. Looking at the two programs in the first year of their move you would have to regard the A&M decision to be a stunning strategic success.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:26 pm to LSULella
quote:
SEC>>>>>>>Big 12.
They jumped at the right time.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:31 pm to penman
The answer to the original question doesnt exist. We dont know because A&M is in the SEC...the "what ifs and could have beens" are not relevant.
I personally think A&M could be undefeated, but I dont know the intricate team rivals and what goes on in the big 12 except they suck and have no defense.
I personally think A&M could be undefeated, but I dont know the intricate team rivals and what goes on in the big 12 except they suck and have no defense.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 12:40 pm to penman
quote:
. By virtue of being in the Southeastern Conference they have became significantly more relevant in the larger topic of college football.
What's more relevant? 8-4 in the SEC or 12-0 or 11-1 in the Big 12.
Posted on 11/2/12 at 1:02 pm to sharpSee
sharpsee,
More important that we are in the SEC. Did not realize we were already 8-4.
All that maters is we are in the SEC and after only 1 year it is helping us with recruiting and recognition.
More important that we are in the SEC. Did not realize we were already 8-4.
All that maters is we are in the SEC and after only 1 year it is helping us with recruiting and recognition.
This post was edited on 11/2/12 at 1:03 pm
Posted on 11/2/12 at 1:09 pm to sharpSee
quote:
What's more relevant? 8-4 in the SEC or 12-0 or 11-1 in the Big 12.
Ask Oklahoma State.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News