re: Why are so many Mizzou fans sporting a Georgia 'G' next to their username?

Maybe. The line is -3 @ AU , where UGA holds a decided advantage in the series. AU strong suit is running , not throwing. Where UGA defense is much better against the run than the pass. Where as AU defense struggles against the pass and UGA can throw it a little.

I truly think UGA gets this game, and USC is essentially done in the East.

I Hate JFF a ton , and can't believe I will have to root for him, it's almost not worth winning the East..., almost.

Hotty Toddy everybody !

quote:

---

It doesn't matter too much as long as we get to play Mizzou every year.

---

Yes. Your convincing win against us assures dominance in the future, to be sure.

Let's all put down the "my team is the best team" flags right now and look at the last few games of the East for what they are.

USC will play a crippled UF team (below .500), at home, coming off a bye week and with all their starters. UF has lost 10 players this season, 7 were starters and most were on their OL. USC will win this game.

UGA will lose to Aub. UGA is like UF, they have many injuries to key positions, but their defense wasn't nearly as good as UF's even. Aub can move the ball, their defense is better than UGA's. The game is @ Aub. Aub is going to win this game.

Mizz has to play @ Ole Miss and at home vs aTm. Game is at night, at Ole Miss, Mizz does get a bye week though, but Ole Miss' opponent the week before was just Troy. Mizz is statistically a better team, so they may or may not win this game.
aTm game is at CoMo. aTm has shite for defense, but their offense is MUCH better than Mizzou's (100 more yards and 10 more points a game.) Mizzous defensive stats are good, but they've been inflated by playing teams with crippled offenses and a weak OCC schedule. Mizz may get past OM, but they have no chance of beating aTm.

Like I said, all homerism aside, and just looking at this from a betting perspective, it is what it is.

Zomg. We lost last year? That changes everything. You're not a really bright kid are you?

quote:

---

What about the 38-3 win the year before that, I think that is Exhibit A.

---

This board cracks me up. You bragging about beating a crippled Mizzou team last year? We keep getting told our wins against less crippled teams don't count for much.

Bottom line....let the season play out. I like Mizzou chances!

quote:

---

Bluefin, that is awesome!

---

Awesome = sad waste of time in cackalacky?

quote:

---

We lost last year? That changes everything. You're not a really bright kid are you?

---

Past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior. Y'all have the same coach, virtually the same facilities, recruit the same markets (with the same "success,") and now we've beaten y'all twice in a row under those conditions.

Why would I think anything would change?

nb4b/cthingschangeasaresponse

Wait can someone please explain to this poor dumbass (me) how UGA beating Auburn is a good thing for Mizzou?

quote:

---

Past behavior is the best indicator of future behavior. Y'all have the same coach, virtually the same facilities, recruit the same markets (with the same "success,") and now we've beaten y'all twice in a row under those conditions.

---

Then why are you so worried about Mizzou?

quote:

---

Just going off basic math and assuming all teams are evenly matched, the chances of Mizzou losing both games is 25%, and losing one of two is 50%.

Acting like predicting a Mizzou loss in one of the two remaining games or losing both isn't some crazy troll. On math alone, winning both is a 25% shot.

---

From a probability stand point, and not weighing in other variables, that would be correct, a 25% chance to win both, a 25% to lose both and a 50% chance to lose 1. However, CFB isn't a level playing field, so that math is nice on paper, but it doesn't reflect the reality of the situation and the other variables that impact all games.