Started By
Message
re: Who wins the SEC Championship first of the bottom 8
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:35 pm to VivaZapata27
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:35 pm to VivaZapata27
Yeah, that's what I just said...
0
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:38 pm to AU24
I'm going to go about this a different way. I think the West is clearly better and more competitive, and unless something changes drastically soon then that will continue. If I were placing money on a team to win in the next 3-5 years, I'll take a team from the east simply because I think you don't have to be as great to win that division, and if you get there you gotta win one game.
I'll go with Mizzou. They are the closest out of those eastern teams, and I think they Could win one defensively
Now, if I were ranking those programs over the next half decade they would certainly be behind Arky, tamu and miss
I'll go with Mizzou. They are the closest out of those eastern teams, and I think they Could win one defensively
Now, if I were ranking those programs over the next half decade they would certainly be behind Arky, tamu and miss
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:39 pm to AU24
Would have to put A&M up top for me. Don't think Sumlin will get there but with the right coach it could definitely happen.
Posted on 7/28/16 at 5:58 pm to AU24
I think Bert will win one if they can learn to play the front end of the season
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:19 pm to AU24
Problem is, any of MSU, ARKY, OM, and A&M can have a great team on a given year and still not go 6-0 in the division. It's easier to do that if you're having a great year in the East.
Bama and LSU almost have to have concurrent down seasons for the mentioned teams to have a chance to achieve this. Even if you beat both, one could still control it's own destiny, if they don't lose again. It's almost impossible. But Texas A&M with a big time HC would be the most likely path.
Bama and LSU almost have to have concurrent down seasons for the mentioned teams to have a chance to achieve this. Even if you beat both, one could still control it's own destiny, if they don't lose again. It's almost impossible. But Texas A&M with a big time HC would be the most likely path.
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:35 pm to BowlJackson
You're an idiot. I just responded to your BS. I'm not happy about losing but acting like our defense was bad and yours wasn't was and is laughable.
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:39 pm to I-H8-BAMA
quote:No depth and they just had the best QB in their program's history and couldnt win the West. State will never win the SEC.
Surprised no one has said Mississippi State. They've had some pretty solid teams over the years. I think they're in just as good shape as some other teams that people have picked.
Posted on 7/28/16 at 6:59 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
The only reason y'all scored as much as you did is because our D was constantly on the field because our offense couldn't have not scored if they tried
Time of possesion:
Auburn: 34:20
Mizzou: 25:40
You really should do some research before you say sh it.
You make an excuse about your defense based on TOP but the facts don't jive. In fact your argument is flipped in favor of Mizzou.
You never were very bright though.
Posted on 7/28/16 at 7:59 pm to kilo
Don't argue with bowljackson. Let him eat his cereal
This post was edited on 7/28/16 at 8:01 pm
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News