Started By
Message
re: Which Georgia school would be better for the SEC?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:48 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:48 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
Baseball and other sports have nothing to do with this thread though.
1
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:49 pm to KCM0Tiger
The only way I would want Georgia Tech back in the SEC is if we could trade them for Missouri.
Short of that, I'd like to know if we could replace Missouri with Florida State, or Clemson, or Miami, or Central Florida, or Tulane, or Southern Mississippi, or Marshall, or College of Charleston, or Wofford, or Louisiana Tech, or Millsaps.
Or Samford, or South Florida, or Mercer, or Belmont, or Troy, or Louisiana Monroe, or Sewannee, or Davidson, or fricking Tougaloo.
Other than that, I wouldn't change a thing.
Short of that, I'd like to know if we could replace Missouri with Florida State, or Clemson, or Miami, or Central Florida, or Tulane, or Southern Mississippi, or Marshall, or College of Charleston, or Wofford, or Louisiana Tech, or Millsaps.
Or Samford, or South Florida, or Mercer, or Belmont, or Troy, or Louisiana Monroe, or Sewannee, or Davidson, or fricking Tougaloo.
Other than that, I wouldn't change a thing.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:56 pm to KCM0Tiger
Where are you getting your numbers from? I count GT with 5 SEC championships and 2 ACC championships in football.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:56 pm to KCM0Tiger
Which Missouri school would be better for the SEC?
Football
Conference Titles:
Northwest Missouri State - 25
Missouri - 15
National Championships:
Northwest Missouri State - 4
Missouri - 0
Basketball
Who cares, neither of them are Kentucky
Sorry Missouri, but the numbers don't lie. Can you ask big brother if they want to take their rightful spot as the flagship athletic institution of the state of Missouri?
Football
Conference Titles:
Northwest Missouri State - 25
Missouri - 15
National Championships:
Northwest Missouri State - 4
Missouri - 0
Basketball
Who cares, neither of them are Kentucky
Sorry Missouri, but the numbers don't lie. Can you ask big brother if they want to take their rightful spot as the flagship athletic institution of the state of Missouri?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 2:57 pm to Crimson Legend
quote:No.
Short of that, I'd like to know if we could replace Missouri with Florida State, or Clemson, or Miami, or Central Florida, or Tulane, or Southern Mississippi, or Marshall, or College of Charleston, or Wofford, or Louisiana Tech, or Millsaps. Or Samford, or South Florida, or Mercer, or Belmont, or Troy, or Louisiana Monroe, or Sewannee, or Davidson, or fricking Tougaloo.
Thanks for your inquiry
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:00 pm to Korin
quote:
So GT really is better than them in all 3. Interesting.
And it's not close in some areas
Overall though for the talent and resources they have, Georgia sports should be considered the most underachieving in the nation
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:00 pm to MIZ_COU
quote:
No.
Thanks for your inquiry
East Central Community College?
FAMU?
Robert Morris?
Birmingham Southern?
Tunica School for the Industrial Arts?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:00 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Sorry Missouri, but the numbers don't lie. Can you ask big brother if they want to take their rightful spot as the flagship athletic institution of the state of Missouri?
Sure, if they were actually a D1 school
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:01 pm to KCM0Tiger
Tech is also one of the top research universities in the country.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:02 pm to KCM0Tiger
Georgia and it's not close. But I should just avoid these troll threads.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:03 pm to KCM0Tiger
quote:
Sure, if they were actually a D1 school
But...but...the numbers don't lie!
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:04 pm to undecided
Love it. Georgia Tech and Auburn fans always trot out how shitty UGA is. Yet somehow magically Georgia has absolutely dominated both series in recent years.
PS: Auburn has an even record against UGA in Football, losing record in Basketball, (men's and women's) and Baseball.
Tech at least has posted a winning record in one of those four categories.
So, to recap. UGA sucks, and yet dominates the head to head against Tech (3 out of 4) and a clean sweep of all 4 against the backup school for Georgians who "don't test well".
PS: Auburn has an even record against UGA in Football, losing record in Basketball, (men's and women's) and Baseball.
Tech at least has posted a winning record in one of those four categories.
So, to recap. UGA sucks, and yet dominates the head to head against Tech (3 out of 4) and a clean sweep of all 4 against the backup school for Georgians who "don't test well".
This post was edited on 3/20/15 at 3:05 pm
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:07 pm to KCM0Tiger
This might be the best thread in the history of this board. I have been saying for a while the SEC should kick Georgia out and replace them with Georgia Tech. Somebody in the conference office needs to make this happen
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:07 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
quote:
Dawg in Beaumont
Hahaha. Auburn is definitely in your head. I'm glad we can provide these threads for UGA fans to vent their frustration so they don't start hitting their wives and children
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:11 pm to KCM0Tiger
Bravo.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:13 pm to Dawg in Beaumont
quote:
So, to recap. UGA sucks, and yet dominates the head to head against Tech (3 out of 4) and a clean sweep of all 4 against the backup school for Georgians who "don't test well".
This is the only comfort you guys have which is kinda sad.
Here's the thing though, when Georgia beats Auburn it's the highlight of another disappointing, failed to meet expectation season but when Auburn beats UGA it usually results in a NC run and appears Tech can make the same claim?
Tell me, who's the real winner in this scenario?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:14 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Which Missouri school would be better for the SEC?
Football
Conference Titles:
Northwest Missouri State - 25
Missouri - 15
National Championships:
Northwest Missouri State - 4
Missouri - 0
Basketball
Who cares, neither of them are Kentucky
Sorry Missouri, but the numbers don't lie. Can you ask big brother if they want to take their rightful spot as the flagship athletic institution of the state of Missouri?
Are they also better academically? A higher endowment?
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:16 pm to undecided
Beating Auburn is fun. I'm glad we've gotten to do it a lot lately. We've won the SEC more, every historical ranking has us superior to Auburn, half your student body grew up UGA fans. So to answer your question we're the winner in this scenario.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:16 pm to undecided
It probably sucks beating Auburn a lot in all those sports and gaining all those bragging rights just to have this happen:
Oops, hahahaha.
Oops, hahahaha.
Posted on 3/20/15 at 3:16 pm to auburnphan23
To every anti-UGA poster in the thread - take note that auburnphan is ecstatically agreeing with all of your arguments. Think about what that means about the quality of your points.
Page 2 of 9
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News