Started By
Message

re: Which football program will be better the next 25 years: Texas A&M or Arkansas?

Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:29 am to
Posted by Porker Face
Midnight
Member since Feb 2012
15320 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:29 am to
quote:

It would also cement aTm in the SEC as texas's little brother.


I think that cement hardened about 70 years ago
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:30 am to
quote:

could go either way to be honest. aTm has a long history of being our bitch. At the same time it depends on how well they capitalize on their next coaching hire because sumlin won't be there forever. I hear the texas job opens next year so who will aTm hire if texas takes sumlin?

Lol.
Posted by Choctaw Hog
Member since Nov 2006
7586 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:30 am to
Not sure but both will be better than LSU if college football is even around in 25 years. I guess we will have to revisit this subject in 2037 but by that time the US will be Balkanized so things will be drastically different.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:30 am to
Difference is that weve actually been relevant since 1960 and they haven't
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Heisman trophies are for individuals and shouldn't be displayed in a school's trophy case. I said shouldn't.


I know I know. Arky and Ole Miss don't have any, so we shouldn't celebrate it. Thank goodness you set me straight, as everyone else thinks the Heisman is one of the best trophies in college football.

quote:


I'm sure y'all will build a case just for it with a plaster Johnny Hesiman dick mold you guys can suck as you admire it.


Is that some advice from experience?
Posted by DWag215
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2011
7215 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:31 am to
quote:

For Texas to take Sumlin would be for them to admit we made a good decision for once. That is never going to happen.

Damn, you bit on that?
Posted by hawgfaninc
https://youtu.be/torc9P4-k5A
Member since Nov 2011
46368 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:31 am to
A&M = Tom
Arky = Jerry

Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48713 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Difference is that weve actually been relevant since 1960 and they haven't

relevant where? the SWC?
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:32 am to
Woah! Two Cotton Bowls! Such a powerhouse program must be playing in a top tier bowl this year right?
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:32 am to
quote:

It would also cement aTm in the SEC as texas's little brother.


The SEC really was a step up for them. They only had one big bro in the Big whatever. Now they get to have two, Arkansas and LSU.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:33 am to
My bad.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:33 am to
Yes. The SWC. You do know that the SEC hasnt always been the strongest conference right?
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:35 am to
So our championships dont count because they happened before 1940 but tu's wins from that time period count because.....
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 11:36 am
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48713 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:36 am to
Since joining the BIG12, A&M is 2-9 in bowl games.

In that same span, Ole Miss is 7-1.

Both programs have been to 33 bowl games.

A&M's all-time bowl record is 14-19
Ole Miss' is 21-12.

Tell me once again how A&M is on a different plain.
This post was edited on 12/27/12 at 11:38 am
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145106 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:37 am to
Weve actually played in a bcs bowl. I know you dont understand what thats like
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:40 am to
Awwww, you feeling left out?

Sorry, I don't give enough of a shite about Ole Miss to make another thread.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48713 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Weve actually played in a bcs bowl. I know you dont understand what thats like

Talking shite about playing in a bowl game that you lost? Wow. Congrats.
Posted by Arkansasrazorback
Member since May 2010
9288 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:40 am to
Didn't you claim a few of those titles like 70 years later? That's why nobody gives a frick about them.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48713 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Awwww, you feeling left out?

Sorry, I don't give enough of a shite about Ole Miss to make another thread.

Sorry all you guys can do is talk out of your arse instead of explaining why Texas A&M is more historically relevant than Ole Miss is.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 12/27/12 at 11:46 am to
Ok, how about this concession then: Ole Miss is the more historically relevant program.

This thread is about the next 25 years, during which time A&M has every advantage over Ole Miss except a slightly better history.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 35
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 35Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter