Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:40 pm to Tigerman97
9 teams in tournament, 3 in NIT is the conference argument. obviously much bettr than SEC's.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:40 pm to Tillman
UCLA has more titles than entire ACC. Your move.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:40 pm to Tillman
Duke was tight huh. So what was Oregon here in KC?
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:40 pm to nc14
don't care. most of that was prior to 3 point line most likely.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:40 pm to nc14
don't care. most of that was prior to 3 point line most likely. they've largely been mediocre last 20 years or so
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:42 pm to everytrueson
Kansas was no. 1 seed. SC was 7 seed. you obviously don't understand my argument. lol
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:42 pm to Tillman
quote:
ok again a 7 seed should not be playing a post season game in their home state. it was an unearned advantage. i agree SC played better. but Duke was so tight due to the crowd.
Coach K and a lot of those Duke players have played in some of the most hostile environments across the country. I seriously doubt several thousand Gamecock fans threw one of the greatest coaches in the game and a roster with All-Americans and future NBA players off their game. Coach K said that South Carolina's defense was the best defense his team has played all year and he never mentioned or complained about the game being in Greenville.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:42 pm to Tillman
quote:
prior to 3 point lin
Needed a handicap?
Dunking was outlawed due to Lew and still couldn't slow the Bruins down. Like Bama football. Unlike fly by night Clemson.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:43 pm to CobraCommander83
said Duke has great players and COach K is good coach doesn't mean SC deserved home court advantage as a 7 seed. you are trying to rationalize something that wasn't fair or earned.
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:43 pm to Tillman
Three straight Final Fours, mediocre for sure.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:44 pm to nc14
Clemson has 2 natties 35 years apart. not really fly by night when you winning in two differetn decades.
in pre-BCS era, Clemson wins last year too as only regular season undefeated.
in pre-BCS era, Clemson wins last year too as only regular season undefeated.
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:45 pm to Tillman
quote:
9 teams in tournament, 3 in NIT is the conference argument. obviously much bettr than SEC's.
the irony of this statement based on your past comments concerning the SEC and football is laughable.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:45 pm to Tillman
I don't post here often and I don't know who this Tillman guys but man is he melting! LOL
This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm to TiptonInSC
I'd say that crowd vs Duke was:
60% rowdy South Carolina fans.
15% North Carolina fans that were remaining that woke up and started cheering against Duke.
25% Duke fans.
And if you watched the games in New York, there were a lot of South Carolina fans there, although it was not quite as strong as South Carolina. They're just excited about their team.
Arizona will be closer to 50/50...I think. But folks are really excited.
60% rowdy South Carolina fans.
15% North Carolina fans that were remaining that woke up and started cheering against Duke.
25% Duke fans.
And if you watched the games in New York, there were a lot of South Carolina fans there, although it was not quite as strong as South Carolina. They're just excited about their team.
Arizona will be closer to 50/50...I think. But folks are really excited.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm to Tillman
35 is 15 outside of the 20 you stated. The rope a dope...the dope becomes you.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm to Tillman
Your argument is sad. You say Duke (2 seed) got scared and lost as a result. Oregon was a 3 and played a road game in KC. I was at the game and it was 95% ku crowd.
Your argument is that the crowd scared Duke. frick that. By your logic Oregon should have got their arse kicked.
Your argument is that the crowd scared Duke. frick that. By your logic Oregon should have got their arse kicked.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:46 pm to Tillman
quote:
Clemson has 2 natties 35 years apart. not really fly by night when you winning in two differetn decades.
Bringing up football in a basketball thread.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:47 pm to AHCOO
quote:
I don't post here often and I don't know who this Tillman guys but man is he melting! LOL
this is normal. he repeats inaccurate rhetoric at nauseam. he's like a car wreck. when i drive by i can't help but stop and watch.
Posted on 3/26/17 at 6:47 pm to Tigerman97
quote:
e irony of this statement based on your past comments concerning the SEC and football is laughable.
no b/c i'm not saying ACC is best conf simply based on UNC beating Kentucky or if UNC wins it all. i'm basing it on rankings of all the teams which is based on SOS and SOR.
Page 7 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News