Started By
Message

re: What states have at least two football programs/stadiums that will seat 82k+?

Posted on 4/13/16 at 11:45 am to
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9590 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Doesn't Tulane use the Superdome?

Not any more. They moved back on campus. I think this will be their third year at Yulman. Either way, The Dome sits only a hair over 70k. IIRC.
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 11:46 am to
quote:

California - USC and Rose Bowl


Used to be 4.

Coliseum
Rose Bowl
Stanford Stadium
California Memorial Stadium

In the '70s they took California Memorial Stadium down below 82k in capacity and then in the '00s they reduced it again after a big renovation.

Stanford Stadium was razed and rebuilt much smaller in 2005 if I remember correctly, but it had been something like 85-89k capacity before.
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 11:47 am
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 11:51 am to
quote:

Stanford Stadium was razed and rebuilt much smaller in 2005 if I remember correctly, but it had been something like 85-89k capacity before.


Yea, it looks really nice now











This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 11:52 am
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35343 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 11:57 am to
New Stanford Stadium is fantastic. The only one was just way too big to be practical at all.

USC is actually reducing seating at the Coliseum significantly when they do the remodel so I think it's going down to less than 80K
Posted by KCM0Tiger
Kansas City, MISSOURI
Member since Nov 2011
15512 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:26 pm to
So basically, what schools in the SEC aren't flagships of their state
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

USC is actually reducing seating at the Coliseum significantly when they do the remodel so I think it's going down to less than 80K


That one end zone is waaaaaaaaaaaaay back there.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58913 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:21 pm to
UCLA and the Rose Bowl---California

South Carolina, according to Wiki only holds 81,500, but I would trust your numbers over Wiki

LINK

Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35343 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

That one end zone is waaaaaaaaaaaaay back there.



Yeah, they're getting rid of a lot of those seats, which are currently the worst of any venue I can possibly imagine. If you're stuck sitting there currently, there is zero reason to go to the game because you can't see shite anyway.
Posted by oman
Dallas
Member since Sep 2014
3280 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

New Stanford Stadium is fantastic. The only one was just way too big to be practical at all.


Plus, you'd get splinters in your arse from the shitty wooden benches.

Because they got rid of the track, supposedly the farthest seats in the new stadium are closer to the field than the previous closest seats had been.
This post was edited on 4/13/16 at 2:12 pm
Posted by Cooter Davenport
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2012
9006 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:43 pm to
SC has control of the stadium now, right? I don't mean ownership, but they are lease #1 these days and can modify it how they like within reason I think. It's going to be pretty wild when the Trojans share use with the Rams.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37613 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

I disagree that the Rose Bowl and the LA Colosseum are "college" stadiums attached to the universities.

The Colosseum was built by the City of Los Angeles to compete for the 1924 Olympics.

The Rose Bowl was built by the City of Pasadena in 1922. It only started serving as the home of UCLA in 1982.

They don't count, in my opinion.


That's exactly what I was trying to say ... but then, naturally, some wanted to make it about last year's attendance and yet others wanted to make it about on-campus only and then others wanna make it about whether there is bench seating or chair back seating ... you can't have nice things around here. You just can't.
Posted by joshua2571
Member since Nov 2015
8137 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:51 pm to
Ole Miss maybe. State just added 6,000 seats in 2014. State will probably add just enough seats to beat Ole Miss . It's a pissing match on who has the biggest seating capacity.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
145139 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:55 pm to
The city of Los Angeles alone has this. Texas has two stadiums that seat over 100k
Posted by Farmer1906
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Apr 2009
50381 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

Texas has two stadiums that seat over 100k


3 if you count Jerryworld.
Posted by usc6158
Member since Feb 2008
35343 posts
Posted on 4/13/16 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

SC has control of the stadium now, right? I don't mean ownership, but they are lease #1 these days and can modify it how they like within reason I think. It's going to be pretty wild when the Trojans share use with the Rams.



Yes
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter