Started By
Message
re: week 10 questionable calls
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:19 am to heartbreakTiger
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:19 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:So you agree that the play is clean and within the rules, yet you include it in the OP of a thread titled
I agree it was clean and within the rules
quote:
week 10 questionable calls
This post was edited on 11/2/14 at 9:20 am
1
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:19 am to heartbreakTiger
Nothing dirty about it, just a fluke thing. I hope Treadwell will be alright.
Tearaways would solve this kind of thing.
Tearaways would solve this kind of thing.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:20 am to The Nino
you should probably click the link since the name of the link is week 10 questionable calls. They go over the controversial calls of the week, I didn't say dirty hits of the week.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:23 am to heartbreakTiger
I tend not to click on hbT links...never know what's going to pop up 
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:27 am to The Nino
it would have prevented the rustling
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:29 am to heartbreakTiger
I'm very rustled. Inconsolably rustled.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:30 am to The Nino
Even if Auburn did have 12 men on the field, it is only a 5 yard penalty. I would argue that at least 1 questionable holding penalty and at least 1 questionable personal foul penalty went against Auburn and were more costly yardage wise
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:33 am to auburnphan23
very possible, the sec refs aren't the best.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:33 am to auburnphan23
I'm just going to assume we did have 12 on the field. Just one of many missed/wrong calls in that game
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:51 am to The Nino
quote:
I'm just going to assume we did have 12 on the field.
They snapped the ball with 12 men....
The astonishing part is the formation is illegal, regardless of the number of players. I think the applicable rule is 7-1-4 (or somewhere close to that section).
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:57 am to LC412000
landmass gone be more butt hurt when bama shoves the final nail in the coffin.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 9:58 am to arrakis
so two different penalties missed on the same play 
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:00 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
so two different penalties missed on the same play
Yep
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:02 am to arrakis
the SEC rant has so much butthurt over Auburn, they obsess that almost 150 yards in penalties against us was not enough.
LOVE IT!!
These are my favorite threads.
LOVE IT!!
These are my favorite threads.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:04 am to lowspark12
quote:
Obvious photoshop
Which player is "obviously" photoshopped?
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:07 am to heartbreakTiger
Refs miss an obvious call on AU. Shocker. You'd think they'd be watching them a lot more closely after all the dirty late hits.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:12 am to SB in KC
quote:
Which player is "obviously" photoshopped?
The center. Look at the pixels.
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:17 am to heartbreakTiger
quote:
Treadwell wasn't a horse collar but injuries from guys pulling a jersey and jumping on the legs of a beast ball carrier could keep happening. it is basically the same thing, the pull isn't hurting them it is the jumping on their legs while pulling. Perhaps the 80s short jerseys make a return to prevent these injuries on what appear to be clean tackles.
How does this apply to your subject line? How was the ruling on the field questionable?
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:17 am to MrAUTigers
I also think the referees might have missed an illegal block on Ole Miss on the Treadwell play. If you watch the video, #74 for Ole Miss gets in front of Treadwell and blocks an Auburn player in the knees. Thus clearing the way for Treadwell to get into the endzone. Based on some of the things I have read, cut blocks are supposed to be illegal more than 10 yards past the line of scrimmage
Posted on 11/2/14 at 10:22 am to GonzoLeslie
I know you seriously think we was down because his ankle may touched? That was a fumble and only a complete idiot thinks it wasn't.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News