Started By
Message
re: Was it all worth it, A&M fans, now that your season is a failure?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:29 pm to KaiserSoze99
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:29 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Maybe. Maybe not.
the last legit IQ test I did was like 8 or so years ago. it was a pretty fun test though. I usually dominate image association and shite like that
0
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:29 pm to TH03
quote:
what a retarded statement since you quoted me spelling IQ
It's a JOKE! Holy shite you really ARE an idiot
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:30 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
So straw man=anything that pokes holes in the argument of TH03. Got it
no, bringing up a point I wasn't making and poking holes in it is a straw man
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:30 pm to TbirdSpur2010
quote:
It's a JOKE! Holy shite you really ARE an idiot
can you really not detect sarcasm?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:30 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
Aaaan the thread gets an anchor.
Bout damn time
What a piece of work this one is.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:31 pm to TH03
Can you really not understand logic?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:32 pm to TH03
quote:
no, bringing up a point I wasn't making and poking holes in it is a straw man
Used your reasoning against you. You had a poor premise, and had no recourse but to squeal "straw man" when it collapsed on you.
Better luck next time.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:33 pm to TH03
quote:
so by your logic, aTm is better because they beat oklahoma in a bowl and LSU lost to clemson.
the bowl game is the only thing that separates them from identical records.
You can't change history. You can't just pick one game to eliminate to help redefine your season. If that's the case, I choose the LSU/A&M game to counteract your bowl game.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:34 pm to TH03
I'll go ahead and lay it out for you.
LSU may have been the better team in 2012 because LSU had better players, played a tougher schedule (arguable) and won the head to head. The better team doesn't always win at home(see Bama in 2011 and 2012). Final standings and polls are not necessarily reliable, because they don't tell the whole story.
You come in with your blanket statement that 24-19 is the end-all, be-all argument for why LSU was the better team is not anywhere NEAR sufficient. I don't think any of us were even arguing that A&M was the better team. We were just shooting down your shitty logic.
LSU may have been the better team in 2012 because LSU had better players, played a tougher schedule (arguable) and won the head to head. The better team doesn't always win at home(see Bama in 2011 and 2012). Final standings and polls are not necessarily reliable, because they don't tell the whole story.
You come in with your blanket statement that 24-19 is the end-all, be-all argument for why LSU was the better team is not anywhere NEAR sufficient. I don't think any of us were even arguing that A&M was the better team. We were just shooting down your shitty logic.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:35 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
I don't think any of us were even arguing that A&M was the better team. We were just shooting down your shitty logic.
This.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:36 pm to TbirdSpur2010
It's the bias, emotional, shite-talking, disrespectful fans that don't seem to understand this concept.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:37 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
We were just shooting down your shitty logic.
your logic was that aTm was better because they finished higher in the polls, which was a result of you beating oklahoma and LSU losing to clemson. those 2 games have no bearing on LSU beating aTm.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:39 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It's the bias, emotional, shite-talking, disrespectful fans that don't seem to understand this concept.
from the guy repeatedly calling me a dumbass and retarded.
besides, after the first half of 1/9, all emotional response from LSU football except for incessant laughter left my mind
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:41 pm to TH03
quote:
those 2 games have no bearing on LSU beating aTm.
Where did I say that? I said that if LSU beating A&M BY ITSELF is the only reason LSU was the better team, then A&M beating Bama proves that A&M was better. LSU beating Bama in 2011 proves that 21-0 did not, in fact, actually happen.
It's shitty logic, but you cling to it like you're hanging off the ledge of a building. The better team doesn't always win....EVEN AT HOME. To say otherwise ignores other EXACTLY SIMILAR situations.
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:42 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
LSU beating Bama in 2011 proves that 21-0 did not, in fact, actually happen.
whew, thank god
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:42 pm to KaiserSoze99
quote:
It's shitty logic, but you cling to it like you're hanging off the ledge of a building. The better team doesn't always win....EVEN AT HOME. To say otherwise ignores other EXACTLY SIMILAR situations.
He's beyond salvage
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:43 pm to TH03
Did I effectively communicate your logical flaws?
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:45 pm to KaiserSoze99
I knew from the moment you first pointed it out.
I just don't give up easily
I just don't give up easily
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:50 pm to goldennugget
Considering JFF is yet again the best player in the country and why we score more than 40 per game, the answer is obviously yes, it was clearly worth it.
Our defense has nothing to do with JFF's off season.
Our defense has nothing to do with JFF's off season.
This post was edited on 10/21/13 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 10/21/13 at 1:50 pm to TH03
quote:
I just don't give up easily
Neither do I. Especially when I am right.
Page 9 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News