Started By
Message

re: Vanderbilt pays $1.2M to remove 'Confederate' from dorm name

Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:13 am to
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51253 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:13 am to
It should be important to note here that Vanderbilt isn't just going against the United Daughters of the Confederacy and striking the "Confederate" name from the building. They tired that a decade ago and failed.

They're using donated funds to repay the UDC for their original donation in 2016 dollars. The UDC probably isn't too upset to be receiving $1.2 million.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 8:16 am
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:13 am to
Apparently I mean you. A lot of people thought the wars I fought in were ill advised, unjust, and unfair to the people in the countries in which I fought. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But the friends I had who dies in the those wars should be honored regardless because they were only trying to serve their country. That memorial hall does NOT honor the government of the Confederacy, it honors the men who died fighting under it, in their minds to protect their homes and people. I absolutely believe the world is better for the Confederate defeat. I also believe that slavery is one of the worst, if not the worst, evil ever perpetrated by the the people of the United States. But every time I see something that gives me qualms I don't want it scraped away and forgotten.
Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42620 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:19 am to
Good job Vandy. This needed to go a long arse time ago. It's a shame though that they're paying the Daughters 1.2 million.
Posted by tiger81
Brentwood, TN.
Member since Jan 2008
18801 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:27 am to
Insane political correctness is killing this country.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Who do u consider the peasants



People who take a Talibanistic approach to old things that offend them. Rather than using them to foster discussion, research, and (strangely appropriate on a college campus) education. Read up on history bud. Basically everybody and everything of historic importance took a dump on somebody or a group of somebodies. But I don't want to see that history hidden away, leaving us with a sterile, inoffensive landscape that doesn't make you sad.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Don't worry your pretty little head about it. The welfare state and the police state have done far more to destroy the black race in this country than any southern racist could have ever dreamed of.


This should be on the Poli board but it rings loud and clear of the truth. The liberal democrats who champion for minorities are the biggest hypocrites out there. They perpetuate the welfare state and keep the black community and other minorities dependent on the government to win votes period. When did Hillary Clinton visit the ghetto? When did Obama? When have they created jobs for that community. They haven't they have stood by and let jobs be sent over seas that those folks could have been apart of and instead gave cell phones.
Posted by LSUMastermind
South Florida
Member since Jun 2008
897 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:39 am to
hilarious.
Posted by MizzouTrue
Member since Jun 2016
3841 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:49 am to
Didn't Bedford Forrest create the klan?

Frick him
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:51 am to
But isn't true that the welfare state was created because the lack of opportunity that were afforded to blacks? It isn't like white business owners were just lining up to employee blacks and pay them equal wages back in the 60s, especially in the south
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Didn't Bedford Forrest create the klan?



No, he didn't create the klan. He was chosen to lead it early on. Forrest also tried to disband the klan as he disagreed with the activities its members were partaking in. He was also invited to speak at one of the precursors of the NAACP later in his life.

I am not trying to say he was always a nice guy. He could be savage in his brutality at many parts of his life. On the whole, his actions paint a negative picture of him when viewed in their totality. Learn about things, make your own assessments, and move on. But trying to avoid talking about the past by hiding it is, IN MY OPINION, a mistake.
This post was edited on 8/16/16 at 8:58 am
Posted by LSUMastermind
South Florida
Member since Jun 2008
897 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:58 am to
you cant really be serious?

Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 8:59 am to
quote:

hilarious.


By all means, provide me with more feedback than an emoji if you are at all capable of doing so.
Posted by Mizzou59
Mid-MO
Member since May 2016
397 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:01 am to
This point is stupid. Blacks only root for whites when they're playing sports, too.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:02 am to
quote:

This point is stupid. Blacks only root for whites when they're playing sports, too.



Let's not do this.
Posted by LSUMastermind
South Florida
Member since Jun 2008
897 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:09 am to
quote:

By all means, provide me with more feedback than an emoji if you are at all capable of doing so.


you are being a bit revisionist.
protecting their homes?
thats pretty disingenuous
most states in the confederate in their declaration of secession listed slavery as one of the main points of seceding.
I have no problem with the heritage part, display it, love it, do what you please.
Just dont tell black people in the same breath to get over slavery.
kinda hypocritical.
Posted by InThroughTheOutDore
Middle TN
Member since Nov 2008
7383 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:10 am to
quote:

...and I really don't see the big deal about this at all. I read that the building went up in the 1930s, so it isn't like it holds any real connection to the Confederacy.


It is also worth noting that the naming of this hall (and the receipt of $50k from the Daughters of the Confederacy for the naming rights) pre-dated its association with Vanderbilt. This dormitory is on the old George Peabody College for Teachers campus, which merged with Vanderbilt in 1979.
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8175 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Just dont tell black people in the same breath to get over slavery.


Where did I say this?

quote:

protecting their homes?
thats pretty disingenuous
most states in the confederate in their declaration of secession listed slavery as one of the main points of seceding.


That is exactly why I said there is a distinction between the Confederate government and poor soldiers swept up, oftentimes against their will, into the war effort. I said from the beginning that the Confederacy deserved to lose, not because of the legality of secession, but because slavery was an absolute atrocity.

My people fled here from oppression and famine that left as many as a million dead and caused a roughly equal number to flee the country. I don't expect the British to scrape off every connection to the government of the time. I would rather people just talked about what happened.
Posted by auisssa
Member since Feb 2010
4163 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:25 am to
quote:

it isn't like it holds any real connection to the Confederacy.



Other than being a memorial for said Confederacy.
Posted by LSUMastermind
South Florida
Member since Jun 2008
897 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Where did I say this?


you didnt say it. However, I hear that a lot as if heritage doesnt split both ways in this subject.

quote:

I don't expect the British to scrape off every connection to the government of the time. I would rather people just talked about what happened.


you have a point, but you certainly dont want to be constantly reminded of the horrors im sure.
Posted by TigerFanNKaty
texas
Member since Sep 2008
10232 posts
Posted on 8/16/16 at 9:37 am to
No it's not true it was created by FDR during the depression as a temporary fix for people out of work. As usual with government sponsored programs it gets abused. And I'm talking of doing more to promote black business owners in there own communities. Give those communities more sense of pride in going to work instead of waiting for a check every month and resorting to gangs and crime.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter