Started By
Message

re: University of Texas being sued for NOT doing what Tennessee does

Posted on 3/1/16 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
36014 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 8:26 pm to
I represented about half a dozen guys from my old fraternity in student conduct charges at USC. These student conduct hearings are sham proceedings that make a kangaroo court look legit. There are no evidentiary rules, no right of confrontation, no right to cross examine witnesses, no right to present evidence on your behalf and no real right to review evidence in the possession of the school. As if it couldn't get any worse, most of these hearings are run by the Melissa Click's of the world. I was so disillusioned by the whole process I contacted USC's General Counsel and President to complain. These things are so entrenched I got nothing but the run around.
This post was edited on 3/1/16 at 8:28 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 8:43 pm to
Let me lay this out for you.

This comes from the top, as in the presidential administration's interpretation of what federal law (Title IX) empowers them to do.

Through the U.S. Dept of Education's Office of Civil Rights, these interpretations are being used to grind axes and further political agendas (mostly the latter).

The attorneys for universities know that if they don't toe the federal line, they'll lose money. These schools are very dependent on federal funds.

So they adopt these kind of policies to protect themselves. They'd prefer to possibly spend money later defending these practices in court than losing federal money right now, with noncompliance.

Also remember that the standard of evidence is lower in civil matters (preponderance of the evidence) versus criminal matters (beyond reasonable doubt). Those old white men in wigs made it that way (reasonable doubt) because going to jail is involved.
Posted by cardboardboxer
Member since Apr 2012
34330 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:14 pm to
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69902 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:18 pm to
We're mere months away from this being a requirement to frick in college.
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19209 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 9:28 pm to
I think you're right and it's just so wrong.
What has become of higher education?
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
64569 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

Also remember that the standard of evidence is lower in civil matters (preponderance of the evidence) versus criminal matters (beyond reasonable doubt). Those old white men in wigs made it that way (reasonable doubt) because going to jail is involved.

You're still entitled to discovery, cross examining witnesses, and presenting a defense in civil court. School judicial proceedings are a joke, always have been. How things have gone on like this as long as they have is ridiculous.
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15712 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 7:44 am to
quote:

You're still entitled to discovery, cross examining witnesses, and presenting a defense in civil court. School judicial proceedings are a joke, always have been. How things have gone on like this as long as they have is ridiculous.


/thread

Posted by Spindicus Lofrus
Member since Oct 2014
814 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 8:09 am to
If you have a son at or near college age, you have to tell him he can never have sex with a girl who has consumed even the slightest bit of alcohol. That is the world we live in now.

Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter