Started By
Message
Thoughts on the A&M USC game last night/ after the high
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:46 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:46 am
-South Carolina is not terrible as everyone makes out to be/absolutely no depth in secondary was crucial, looks like mike Davis wasn't conditioned well enough for game from injury? Thompson made some nice throws, He will improve endurance and i think cocks will contend for East still
-A&M has proved their potential on offense/ while they made improvements on defense there is still a lot of work to do- missed- blown coverages. I hope they keep the chip on their shoulder cause that is a huge key for young players these days, (look at ou in sugar bowl). Hoping for A&M to contend for west but still may need 1 more year of incoming defensive depth
-A&M has proved their potential on offense/ while they made improvements on defense there is still a lot of work to do- missed- blown coverages. I hope they keep the chip on their shoulder cause that is a huge key for young players these days, (look at ou in sugar bowl). Hoping for A&M to contend for west but still may need 1 more year of incoming defensive depth
9
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:48 am to bounty9
narddogg81 likes men
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 11:20 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:51 am to bounty9
Carolina looked like dog shite.
Their offensive line missed simple MLB blitzes, right up the middle. Their Oline is terrible. They were out of shape, which we've seen before as Clowney couldn't play more than two plays in a row in last years opener.
Carolina was not prepared. They were gassed in the first qtr. they couldn't tackle. They couldn't cover. Their DC continued to run a zone coverage. Spurrier needs to coach more, shite his mouth, and stay off the golf course.
Their offensive line missed simple MLB blitzes, right up the middle. Their Oline is terrible. They were out of shape, which we've seen before as Clowney couldn't play more than two plays in a row in last years opener.
Carolina was not prepared. They were gassed in the first qtr. they couldn't tackle. They couldn't cover. Their DC continued to run a zone coverage. Spurrier needs to coach more, shite his mouth, and stay off the golf course.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:52 am to bounty9
south carolina wasn't good enough to keep your offense off the field. no ball control, no disruption on defense.
was like shooting fish in a barrel for you guys, i wouldn't be quick to derive too much of anything from that game other than the fact that your o-line is good and your defense is suspect.
was like shooting fish in a barrel for you guys, i wouldn't be quick to derive too much of anything from that game other than the fact that your o-line is good and your defense is suspect.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:52 am to bounty9
Wasn't able to watch. Did Speedy Noil do anything?
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:53 am to bounty9
USC D is as soft as I've seen in a few years and Thompson is no Conner Shaw
aTm's D, especially the secondary is not very good
I was impressed with the athleticism on the outside by aTm.
aTm's D, especially the secondary is not very good
I was impressed with the athleticism on the outside by aTm.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:53 am to LSUsuperfresh
Stop saying yall's
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:53 am to Hawgeye
USCe dbs played 10 yards off receivers and no pass rush bad combination even with young QB. He did look good though!
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:54 am to bounty9
quote:
-South Carolina is not terrible as everyone makes out to be/absolutely no depth in secondary was crucial, looks like mike Davis wasn't conditioned well enough for game from injury? Thompson made some nice throws, He will improve endurance and i think cocks will contend for East still
agree completely.
quote:
-A&M has proved their potential on offense/ while they made improvements on defense there is still a lot of work to do- missed- blown coverages. I hope they keep the chip on their shoulder cause that is a huge key for young players these days, (look at ou in sugar bowl). Hoping for A&M to contend for west but still may need 1 more year of incoming defensive depth
agree here too, but don't think aTm will have a chip on their shoulder after the media sucks them off. Either way, dat O was nice.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:54 am to narddogg81
SC is not contending for the East.
Just stop. It was a good win, but they are just an average team.
Just stop. It was a good win, but they are just an average team.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:55 am to bwallcubfan
Looks like SC has a very small front 4 on defense. They looked about half the size of the A&M o-line. Scary bad defense all the way around.
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:55 am to JesusQuintana
they are an average team, and will still contend for the east because the east is also average
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:55 am to bounty9
A&M did exactly what a good team does and they took what USC gave them, which was everything.
I know A&M fans might take this the wrong way, but that USC D had NO CLUE what to do. None.
You cannot play that poorly on D and beat and O as good as A&M's. You just can't
The way USC played D last night, they shouldn't be ranked. Missed open field tackles, did get physical with A&M's WRs and had ZERo pressure on the QB for most of the night.
To add, USC looked very slow on D.
ALL THE PROPS TO A&M because ya'll played perfect on O, but USC was not a good team on D last night.
I know A&M fans might take this the wrong way, but that USC D had NO CLUE what to do. None.
You cannot play that poorly on D and beat and O as good as A&M's. You just can't
The way USC played D last night, they shouldn't be ranked. Missed open field tackles, did get physical with A&M's WRs and had ZERo pressure on the QB for most of the night.
To add, USC looked very slow on D.
ALL THE PROPS TO A&M because ya'll played perfect on O, but USC was not a good team on D last night.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:57 am to bounty9
I think I read somewhere that Mike Davis ate too many ribs and that's why he was ineffective
Posted on 8/29/14 at 9:59 am to bounty9
Thing that most impressed me about A&M was that the Aggies weren't sloppy. No turnovers and I didn't see any offsides penalties on the offensive line.
Compared to the other SEC teams that played last night (USC, Vandy and Ole Miss), A&M looked like they were already three games into the season.
Your D-line looks better than last year. Your D-Backs have some definite improving to do. I think your rushing attack has some improving to do also.
Compared to the other SEC teams that played last night (USC, Vandy and Ole Miss), A&M looked like they were already three games into the season.
Your D-line looks better than last year. Your D-Backs have some definite improving to do. I think your rushing attack has some improving to do also.
This post was edited on 8/29/14 at 10:06 am
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:04 am to Stuttgart Tiger
quote:
Thing that most impressed me about A&M was that the Aggies weren't sloppy. No turnovers and I didn't see any offsides penalties on the offensive line.
completely agree
Sumlin is a good coach
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:06 am to Stuttgart Tiger
I never doubted A&M. Defense was going to be improved from last year. The offense has some special guys, RSJ9, SN2, KH7. The O-Line looked really good as well. Congrats on the great win 
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News