Started By
Message
re: This Ole Miss thing is gonna really hurt the SEC
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:32 pm to Dallasgrowl
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:32 pm to Dallasgrowl
quote:Is your dumbass gonna say that Ole Miss hasn't been a toss-up game for LSU the last 5 years?...that Ole Miss hasn't been nationally ranked often during the last 5 years? You dumb motherfricker, "5-6 years" doesn't require historic perspective.
quote:
what the frick does my age have to do with anything
quote:
within the conference for the last 5-6 years
Obviously, It means you don't have a fricking clue from a historic perspective. Go do your homework little fella.
I listened to LSU beat Ole Miss on a Billy Cannon punt return on Halloween night, and watched on TV Charlie Flowers & Co. take LSU apart later that year in the Sugar Bowl, so don't talk to me about "historic perspective"
This post was edited on 2/23/17 at 6:34 pm
1
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:34 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
This conference doesn't need any "cripples" around the league dragging it down in both quality and reputation. Personally, I hate like hell it happened.
bullshite gramps. If this was Auburn, your 80 year old geriatric arse would be splooging dust all over this board.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:38 pm to coachcrisp
Baylor's crimes have not hurt the Big 12 at all. And they are about as bad as it can get, reputation wise.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:41 pm to NFLSU
quote:
Just imagine if the NCAA gave two shits about Alabama cheating..
Or LSU.
Not that LSU wins a lot.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:41 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
ullshit gramps. If this was Auburn, your 80 year old geriatric arse would be splooging dust all over this board.
Wrong again, shite-stain! I don't want ANY SEC team on probation. Alabama, unlike you guys, don't need a team to be hamstrung in order to beat them. 
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:41 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
1) Ole Miss(cheating or not) has been an important game within the conference for the last 5-6 years, drawing a lot of national exposure.
6 years ago, Ole Miss went 2-10.
5 years ago, Ole Miss went 7-6.
Last year, Ole Miss went 5-7.
The "important years" you're talking about, Ole Miss won 10, 9, or 8 games, when counting the bowl games. Your age shows in your post because you don't have any perspective on what Ole Miss is historically. They beat Bama twice. That's it.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 6:53 pm to wmr
quote:
Your age shows in your post because you don't have any perspective on what Ole Miss is historically.
Just an fyi...he's probably older than your grandfather. I'm surprised we haven't read his obit on here yet honestly.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:04 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:Hell, I probably humped his grandmother...Damn, I hope I didn't spawn that bastard.
Just an fyi...he's probably older than your grandfather. I'm surprised we haven't read his obit on here yet honestly.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:10 pm to LC412000
quote:
Crispy you are trying to express a rational thought to irrational individuals. I am in agreement with you
It's like trying to teach a possum to play chess!
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:14 pm to coachcrisp
OP sits down to pee
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:16 pm to Vols&Shaft83
If it's in the dark and I'm drunk...you're right!
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:17 pm to coachcrisp
OK, I've been there.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:20 pm to Vols&Shaft83
Once, I couldn't find the light switch, nor the door knob.............alright, more than once.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:21 pm to coachcrisp
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:25 pm to coachcrisp
Really? Besides your normal 5-6 teams that go 9-3 or better, everyone else is like 8-5 and worse. So, who cares if Ole Miss is the new Vandy. It will helps the like of the Aggies, Razorbacks, and State, have more wins.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:26 pm to coachcrisp
Yeah for Bama because they beat your arse every year. To the rest of the SEC it's an easy win. It's not a marquis matchup.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:36 pm to coachcrisp
quote:
don't talk to me about "historic perspective"
I thought I told you to go do your homework little boy. I may have to put you to bed without your dinner if you don't watch your attitude.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:41 pm to CBP3110
quote:Really? Aren't y'all 3-2 against them in the last 5 years?
To the rest of the SEC it's an easy win. It's not a marquis matchup.
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:42 pm to CBP3110
One way it COULD hurt the conference...
From what I can tell in the documents, the NCAA has cited 5 "prospective" student athletes. One (student A) apparently went to OM and transferred to Auburn - he is the one who received the hunting trips. Student B is Lewis who ended up at State. Where did the other 3 end up? I've heard rumors of Bama, Georgia...
Those student athletes have immunity for anything improper that occurred during their recruitment/tenure with OM. Does that immunity extend to the institutions they transferred to/signed with? Especially for those who chose another school through recruitment - IF they admitted to receiving improper benefits from OM, some might argue it's possible they ultimately received more benefits from the school they finally selected. Could those schools be open to inquiry from the NCAA? Does it open a can of worms?
IF the NCAA thinks another school offered/paid more than OM, and that's why the students chose to go elsewhere, other investigations could follow. It would be bad for the conference to have that NCAA microscope out at 4-5 additional schools as a result of OM shenanigans.
Thoughts?
From what I can tell in the documents, the NCAA has cited 5 "prospective" student athletes. One (student A) apparently went to OM and transferred to Auburn - he is the one who received the hunting trips. Student B is Lewis who ended up at State. Where did the other 3 end up? I've heard rumors of Bama, Georgia...
Those student athletes have immunity for anything improper that occurred during their recruitment/tenure with OM. Does that immunity extend to the institutions they transferred to/signed with? Especially for those who chose another school through recruitment - IF they admitted to receiving improper benefits from OM, some might argue it's possible they ultimately received more benefits from the school they finally selected. Could those schools be open to inquiry from the NCAA? Does it open a can of worms?
IF the NCAA thinks another school offered/paid more than OM, and that's why the students chose to go elsewhere, other investigations could follow. It would be bad for the conference to have that NCAA microscope out at 4-5 additional schools as a result of OM shenanigans.
Thoughts?
Posted on 2/23/17 at 7:44 pm to Dallasgrowl
quote:Please! please! let your old lady put me to bed again.
I thought I told you to go do your homework little boy. I may have to put you to bed without your dinner if you don't watch your attitude.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News