Started By
Message

re: The SEC's Big Six according to SB Nation

Posted on 7/2/15 at 6:49 am to
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 6:49 am to
quote:

So teams have only played football since 1993?


Only Auburn...thats when their fb history started or maybe the last 10 years.
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 6:59 am to
1983 is when Georgia pretty much stopped playing football, or at least pretty much when they stopped winning anything.
Posted by hg
Member since Jun 2009
123594 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:10 am to
quote:

It's not something we'd really like to acknowledge, but Auburn is in the bottom of the Big Six, historically. The Tigers are never better than 4th in any category and are tied for the bottom with Tennessee in the overall numbers.


Damn
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27297 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:11 am to
So SECC aren't considered "winning anything"?

And speaking of 1983,was that your 2nd SECC ever?

It took you 50 years to win 2 SECC and both times you ended up on probation...that about sums it up.
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:22 am to
If I were a Georgia fan, I wouldn't mention cheating in this thread considering even a Georgia professor claims the coach who won 6 of your 8 conference championships during the Big 6 era along with your only national championship was a cheater. David Pollack pretty much claims the coach who won the other 2 conference championships is a cheater
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 7:26 am
Posted by lefty08
Not in Auburn or Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
5575 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:25 am to
So what we really have is a "big 5" with an "ahh hell, throw auburn in there for the hell of it, make it an even 6. They are the only other team to win the SEC that couple of times"

That's enlightening
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 7:26 am
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:37 am to
Auburn has won 7 conference championships since 1983. Arkansas has won zero since joining the conference in 1992. Kind of shows how much you suck
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

what about this gem


During most of that time period, Auburn played 4 of the 5 remaining Big Six (not counting Auburn) EVERY DAMN YEAR in their schedule. The only one we didn't play on an annual basis from the 1960's to the 1990's is LSU.

How many of the Big Six teams (not counting UGA) did UGA play on an annual basis? Auburn and Florida? That's it, right?

So while Auburn's SEC schedule in most of those years was packed with the Big Six, UGA's was what? Kentucky, Vanderbilt, and Ole Miss?
Posted by Fratigerguy
Member since Jan 2014
4742 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:51 am to
quote:

From 1964 to 2008, the Vols finished outside of the Top Six just four times

WOW


And 6 of the last 7 years. We call that a trend around these parts, boy.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Why did they limit it to since 1964?


That's the year Georgia Tech left the SEC (followed by Tulane a year or two later), so that's when the form of the "modern" Southeastern Conference began.
Posted by bigDgator
Dallas, TX
Member since Oct 2008
41191 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:52 am to
This is bullshite. If you are gonna put an asterisk by our number of SEC titles it is 10. We had the best record in the conference on 1990 as well.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:52 am to
quote:

How many of the Big Six teams (not counting UGA) did UGA play on an annual basis? Auburn and Florida? That's it, right?



Ah hem




Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38011 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:57 am to
quote:

Ah hem


You'll note that I said "During MOST of that time period..."

UGA did not start playing Tennessee on an annual basis until the SEC split into division in 1992. Prior to that (from the 1960's through the 70's, 80's and into the early 90's), they were a rotating opponent.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 7:59 am to
quote:

a Georgia professor claims the coach who won 6 of your 8 conference championships during the Big 6 era along with your only national championship was a cheater. David Pollack pretty much claims the coach who won the other 2 conference championships is a cheater


Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:03 am to
quote:

If I were a Georgia fan, I wouldn't mention cheating in this thread considering even a Georgia professor claims the coach who won 6 of your 8 conference championships during the Big 6 era along with your only national championship was a cheater. David Pollack pretty much claims the coach who won the other 2 conference championships is a cheater






And you have the balls to call me repetitive
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:16 am to
The difference is my repetitive post are specifically targeted to get under the skin of a fan base that views themselves as the morality champions of the universe. The post obviously work

A lot of your post are random and you are dumb enough to think it makes you some legendary internet comedian.
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:18 am to
I only post that information when your fellow mutt yards start spewing their moral superiority bs. If it is a broken record, it doesn't say very much for your own fan base
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 8:21 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:21 am to
quote:

The difference is my repetitive post are specifically targeted to get under the skin of a fan base that views themselves as the morality champions of the universe. The post obviously work


you familiar with the phrase "delusions of grandeur"? That's you to an absolute tee. Just saying something doesn't make it so. You probably think in your mind you're some master level troll that gets people all fuming mad to where they have to step away from the computer and compose themselves because you've really just got them good and they can't even think of any legible words in response they're so gotten. In reality, you repeating the same 4 or 5 phrases over and over ad nauseum only makes you look like a complete moron, and annoys the board. Yes, I know...you don't care about popularity contests and you don't care that people find you annoying. I get it. I'm just saying, the view you have of yourself couldn't be farther than how you are actually viewed.


quote:

A lot of your post are random and you are dumb enough to think it makes you some legendary internet comedian.


V&S is real. He knows he says dumb stuff, but he clearly does it in jest and some of his stuff is actually humorous. Nothing you say is original, clever, witty, or funny in any way. You're essentially the kid on the playground who puts your finger a few inches from people's faces and goes "not touching, not touching, not touching, not touching, not touching" then when they swat your hand away you laugh hysterically saying "haha I got you! I got you good!"
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:21 am to
quote:

I only post that information when your fellow mutt yards start spewing their moral superiority bs


when have we said we're morally superior? And where are these rankings? I'd like to consult them to see how morality is judged and where other schools fall in the pecking order.

Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69896 posts
Posted on 7/2/15 at 8:29 am to
quote:

The difference is my repetitive post are specifically targeted to get under the skin of a fan base that views themselves as the morality champions of the universe. The post obviously work

A lot of your post are random and you are dumb enough to think it makes you some legendary internet comedian.




First of all, the plural of "post" is "posts".

Secondly, we've been through this before, and you were so humiliated that you ran from the thread with your tail tucked between your legs. Let's not do this again.


Finally, I don't think of myself as a legendary internet comedian. If you choose to think of me that way, that's your prerogative, but I believe you're taking this whole message board thing too seriously.
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 8:35 am
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter