Started By
Message

re: The new college baseballs

Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:59 pm to
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57728 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 1:59 pm to
quote:


Sooo, there was an issue with us and Nike bats in 2008.
There was also an issue with Fresno State being better than Georgia.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:03 pm to
Your post is like me making fun of AU for losing the title game to FSU. Doesn't really make much sense considering where UGA (and 2008 arkansas baseball, in this example) were by comparison.

Let me know when yall ever win a CWS title.
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
57728 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 2:09 pm to
quote:


Let me know when yall ever win a CWS title.
Let me know when you quit blaming an inanimate object for losing a game.
Posted by Guava Jelly
Bawston
Member since Jul 2009
11651 posts
Posted on 2/12/15 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

The game was perfect with circa 2008 bats IMO

I agree with this wholeheartedly.

quote:

Theoretically the new balls will generate offensive numbers closer to the previous bats while maintaining the ball's safer velocity. We'll see.

I know that's the intent. I'm just not buying it. Like I said, it will breed more hits on the screws. But how many hard hit balls have we seen in the last 4-5 years die at the warning track thanks to deadened bats and shrunken sweet spots.

I just don't see the lowered profile making that big a difference. But, like you said. We shall see.
Page 1 2 3
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter