re: The last time each SEC team lost at home by double digits

quote:

---

and I just thought y'all didn't like us b/c of the 35-21 loss in '10. Well now no wonder.

---

USCe has kicked our arse on the reg recently, relatively speaking.

Kirby gonna go in dry on Freeze this year.

Kirby had better defenses at Bama. Don't see why GA's defense this year is going to stop us.

So Bama's better '15 defense couldn't stop us in Tuscaloosa and you're thinking GA 16 defense will stop us in Oxford? If GA is to win by double digits you will have to keep Kelly and Co. under a TD and FG. I don't see GA scoring more than 21 this game at the absolute max. Kelly with a second year in the system is going to have that thing clickin. I don't see first year head coach coming in and beating us by double digits in the beginning of the season at home with anything less than a Johnny Footballesque QB.

quote:

---

So Bama's better '15 defense couldn't stop us in Tuscaloosa and you're thinking GA 16 defense will stop us in Oxford?

---

dude, this isn't rocket science. You can't apply the transitive property to football, it can't be done.

You scored 43 on the best team in america last year. Seems like that'd be the least you scored right, using your logic? You scored 10 on florida (loss), 24 against memphis ffs (loss), and 23 on texas A&M. JUST because you did extremely well against bama, doens't mean one iota in regards to 2016 georgia.

quote:

---

If GA is to win by double digits

---

never said we would did i?

quote:

---

you will have to keep Kelly and Co. under a TD and FG.

---

so you're saying your defense is going to hold us to 20 points. Where are you getting that from?


You're delusional.

quote:

---

Ole Miss - 2013

---

quote:

---

will come to an end soon

---

not by your team, I promise. your team will leave Oxford with a double digit loss.

quote:

---

but he didn't say that.

---

if you can read, you'll see that that is his entire point.

"BAma last year couldn't stop us so why do you think you can this year?"

That's his point. And it's utterly stupid.

quote:

---

that's what he meant, anyway.

---

It may be what you interpreted from it, but clearly WG has quoted a point that he made which is invalid. As already stated, transitive properties in football just don't work. Otherwise, almost every team would have some way of claiming their share of a conference/national title unless the winner went undefeated. I mean, Florida beat Ole Miss, and Ole Miss beat Bama, so obviously Florida should have won the SECCG last year, right? Oh, but Bama beat LSU and LSU beat Florida so... Or even better. FSU beat the dog snot out of Florida last year, and Florida beat the everloving shite out of Ole Miss last season, but Ole Miss is supposed to contend and/or win that game this year?


Wait I have an idea... why not let the teams play each other and then figure out who wins or loses? fricking brilliant.

quote:

---

You just posted this on the first page insinuating that GA will beat us at home by double figures

---

I did no such thing you idiot. I literally wrote the word "soon".

You play bama in your 3rd game (before UGA). I believe bama will win by double digits. Anything else you took from that is your fault.

quote:

---

Everything is bright and shiny with a new HC and possibly new QB. I just don't think its going to play out how you imagine it.

---

I think we'll go 9-3. Is that unreasonable?

This is how you spend the day of Brexit?

You know how I know you don't have a job...