Started By
Message
re: The All-Time College Football Programs, per the AP (just released)
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:38 pm to Yellerhammer5
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:38 pm to Yellerhammer5
quote:
Well I'm triggered as hell.
I would be, list is shite. And most subjective list are, but this one is bad
1
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:39 pm to Sgt Deds
quote:
To correct your ignorant sisterfricker statement it should be:
OU/Alabama
tOSU
ND
USC
Nebraska.
You just made up the word "sisterfricker", yet I am the ignorant one?
Also, incest jokes are old, man, at least have an original insult...
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:40 pm to GeorgeReymond
So this has nothing to do with wins, losses? Only times they were in AP's poll's? Or were awarded a championship by the AP? Just trying to understand how this was reached.
NVM...confusing as hell...not worth it.
List is shite.
NVM...confusing as hell...not worth it.
List is shite.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 1:43 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:45 pm to GeorgeReymond
Wouldn't this just mean that OSU and Okie are a bit overrated?
OSU - #1 in weeks at #1 - 105
Titles - 5
Avg - 21 weeks at #1 for every title
Okie - #2 in weeks at #1 - 100.5
Titles - 7
Avg - 14.35 weeks per title
Then we have Alabama
Weeks at #1 - 74
Titles - 10
Avg - 7.4 weeks per title
Despite being the most successful program to date, Alabama is routinely underestimated by the AP.
OSU - #1 in weeks at #1 - 105
Titles - 5
Avg - 21 weeks at #1 for every title
Okie - #2 in weeks at #1 - 100.5
Titles - 7
Avg - 14.35 weeks per title
Then we have Alabama
Weeks at #1 - 74
Titles - 10
Avg - 7.4 weeks per title
Despite being the most successful program to date, Alabama is routinely underestimated by the AP.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:47 pm to TheDarrell McSteal
quote:
VOLS at 14 is a joke.
Well y'all aren't top 10 in AP titles, #17 in weeks atop the poll, and #11 in total appearances.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:48 pm to skrayper
I think you could definitely make a case that they're often overrated in the AP poll.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:50 pm to GeorgeReymond
quote:
35 Missouri
Big 35
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:52 pm to GeorgeReymond
List is shite, them only counting 2 for LSU. God dammit 2003
Posted on 8/2/16 at 1:59 pm to skrayper
quote:
Wouldn't this just mean that OSU and Okie are a bit overrated?
OSU - #1 in weeks at #1 - 105
Titles - 5
Avg - 21 weeks at #1 for every title
Okie - #2 in weeks at #1 - 100.5
Titles - 7
Avg - 14.35 weeks per title
Then we have Alabama
Weeks at #1 - 74
Titles - 10
Avg - 7.4 weeks per title
Despite being the most successful program to date, Alabama is routinely underestimated by the AP.
This formula values consistency a lot and punishes bad stretches.
Ohio State worse run
1940s appeared in 55.68% of polls
Alabama worse run
1950s appeared in 18.97% of polls.
Alabama is weird program among the blue bloods. Alabama will be an unstoppable forces for 10-20 years then decide to take break for 5-10 years.
*Updated some of the wording
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:02 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
are old, man, at least have an original insult...
You prefer Rascal driving or Walmart jokes.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:04 pm to Socratics
quote:
This poll values consistency a lot
Consistency in a poll they created? The hell you say.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:05 pm to AshLSU
Just goes to show, even ole miss fans loves them some Bama.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:06 pm to GeorgeReymond
Bama at 4 is a joke
and FSU at 9 is a bigger joke
and FSU at 9 is a bigger joke
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:08 pm to skrayper
quote:
Wouldn't this just mean that OSU and Okie are a bit overrated?
It's apples and oranges. Consistency is weighted heavily so Alabama has a couple pretty bad decades whereas tOSU and OU have only had roughly 1 bad 10 year stretch. This ranking has a pretty modern twist to it. Imagine where Bama would be ranked without the last 3 titles.
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 2:12 pm
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:08 pm to lsupride87
So based on that formula does this mean that USC gets more points* than Texas in 2005?
*putting aside the vacated wins
*putting aside the vacated wins
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:08 pm to elit4ce05
Got damn...
Bama fans are all kind of rustled by this!
Bama fans are all kind of rustled by this!
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:09 pm to AlabamaAlum07
quote:
Top 5 is still good enough for me.
That's suspect to have FSU and Florida in the top 10 though.
The only thing we lack over other programs on this list is raw win totals. They tried their best to adjust the polls based on the fact Miami and FSU didn't start football as early as the other programs on the list.
The only programs I would put above us is LSU due to 2003 bullshite.
As for the Gators
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:11 pm to JesusQuintana
quote:
Got damn...
Bama fans are all kind of rustled by this!
I'm triggered by the formula.
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:11 pm to skrayper
quote:
Wouldn't this just mean that OSU and Okie are a bit overrated?
OSU - #1 in weeks at #1 - 105
Titles - 5
Avg - 21 weeks at #1 for every title
Okie - #2 in weeks at #1 - 100.5
Titles - 7
Avg - 14.35 weeks per title
Then we have Alabama
Weeks at #1 - 74
Titles - 10
Avg - 7.4 weeks per title
Could mean a number of things. Could mean Alabama is underrated. Could mean OSU lost later in the year often when other teams lost earlier so OSU went to #1 by default. Could mean OSU is overrated
Posted on 8/2/16 at 2:13 pm to GeorgeReymond
Horrible ranking system
This post was edited on 8/2/16 at 2:14 pm
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News