Started By
Message
re: Tennessee WR Justin Hunter arrested, charged with felonious assault
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:15 am to SavageOrangeJug
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:15 am to SavageOrangeJug
quote:
How dare me call out your punk self for making light of an act terrorism that cost five military men their lives.
Scumbag.
People get murdered all the time. #TheMoreYouKnow
0
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:18 am to Korin
quote:
I'm not sure. You tell me.
it doesn't
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:20 am to lsufball19
You can't have it both ways.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:22 am to Korin
quote:
You can't have it both ways.
I'm not having it both days. The First Amendment only applies to the government regulating free speech. If you don't agree with how the Constitution applies, take it up with the SCOTUS. If a group of private citizens wants to try to block them, there is nothing the 1st Amendment can do to prevent that. Now, if they break the laws of the state of TN in the process, then yes, they can be prosecuted as such.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:23 am to lsufball19
quote:
Now, if they break the laws of the state of TN in the process, then yes, they can be prosecuted as such.
Which is what I was talking about.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:24 am to Korin
quote:
Which is what I was talking about.
Well then try not to sound ignorant and reference the 1st Amendment. It doesn't help your argument
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:27 am to lsufball19
Neither does trying to have it both ways.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:30 am to Korin
quote:
Neither does trying to have it both ways
not having it both ways, bud. It's ok if you don't understand how the Constitution works and when it applies. Just trying to help you out for the future
This post was edited on 7/21/15 at 11:31 am
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:38 am to lsufball19
Still trying to have it both ways.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:48 am to Korin
quote:
Still trying to have it both ways.
so you hate the Constitution or just don't agree with how it's applied? Sounds like a personal problem to me
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:52 am to lsufball19
I'm wondering why you're trying to have it both ways still.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:54 am to lsufball19
quote:
lsufball19
You seem like a good poster...just letting you know you're going into the rabbit hole with USMC Gators (korin). Soon, you'll be arguing bowl games and then the national champion in 1947. I've seen it a hundred times.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:54 am to Robert Goulet
It's good to see I'm still on your mind, Jerry the Clown. 
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:58 am to Korin
quote:
by Korin
So much for the first amendment.
I'm not seeing any state action restricting your speech. The first amendment is not absolute and it does not apply to private citizens.
Private citizens however are free to treat you however they want. You say offensive stupid shite then you better be ready to accept any consequences of that.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:59 am to TT9
Its like one person on my fantasy team every year gets arrested.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 11:59 am to Volatile
And if they physically attack the protesters then they must be ready to accept consequences as well.
This post was edited on 7/21/15 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 7/21/15 at 12:00 pm to Korin
quote:
I'm wondering why you're trying to have it both ways still.
I'm still wondering why you don't want the Constitution applied how it's intended to be applied. I only want the laws of TN and the United States applied appropriately. Now, if you want to argue why the actions of private citizens are illegal pursuant to TN law, then i'd be more than happy to entertain that argument if you provide the statutory code they'd be breaking. Unfortunately you're too stubborn to admit your own ignorance to how exactly the First Amendment applies. That's ok, it's not unusual for you to go off on an irrelevant and illogical tangent when you've been shown to be ignorant on a topic.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 12:01 pm to Korin
Well sure. But if the protestors had jobs then firing them based on the protesting or other similar action is perfectly fine.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 12:01 pm to Korin
quote:
And if they physically attack the protesters then they must be ready to accept consequences as well.
absolutely. That would not, however, fall under a First Amendment violation. That's a violation of TN state law.
Posted on 7/21/15 at 12:02 pm to Volatile
quote:
Well sure. But if the protestors had jobs then firing them based on the protesting or other similar action is perfectly fine.
And that goes for the people who potentially attack them as well.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News