Started By
Message
re: South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:50 am to gamecocks22
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:50 am to gamecocks22
Not only is it funny, but it's accurate.
1
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:51 am to CNB
quote:
Who, besides the auburn fan, has claimed that South Carolina is elite?
2 different au fans have, it's baffling.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:51 am to Mizz-SEC
quote:
It's no moral victory for us that yoo'inz shite the bed when it counted and broke the image of SEC invincibility around the country.
You still mad that Mason put up over 300 yards. Again congrats on your moral victory.
quote:
Bama wouldn't have dropped the ball.
Yeah that Oklahoma game really proves this.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:52 am to mizzoukills
quote:
Why would we be mad at South Carolina?
I don't know, that's what we're trying to figure out.
Was it 20 straight completions?
Was it 17-0?
Was it Connor Shaw in general?
Was it *boink*?
Was it this?
Help us help you
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:52 am to mizzoukills
quote:
Not only is it funny, but it's accurate.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:53 am to A$AP Cocky
Wait, I thought it was OUR defense that sucked? That was horrifying
Posted on 5/29/14 at 11:58 am to A$AP Cocky
quote:
I don't know, that's what we're trying to figure out. Was it 20 straight completions? Was it 17-0? Was it Connor Shaw in general? Was it *boink*? Was it this?
Like I said, even if we won that game we would've accomplished the same thing: SEC East Champions and appearance in SEC Championship game.
If anything, Mizzou fans were impressed with Shaw's heroic 4th quarter performance. The game was an exciting nailbiter!
However, the outcome of that game didn't matter. Mizzou accomplished what it needed to regardless of that game. A Mizzou victory wouldn't have changed anything.
Now please tell me why you believe Mizzou fans are mad about that game again? And before you backpeddle to 2012...we don't even care about that season. Congrats on beating one of the most injured football teams ever. Nearly every Mizzou fans expected a loss against SC and several other teams that year. That's what is expected when you're playing an inexperienced 3rd string QB with zero O-line, not to mention your star running back is injured.
Derp.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:02 pm to Mizzou to my Lou
quote:
From 2011 - 2013 USCjr has won absolutely nothing of relevance and that explains the intense penis envy they have over Mizzou. It's both flattering and creepy.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:02 pm to mizzoukills
You really need to ask if Mizzou fans care about tht game? Have you even read the threads you started?
Perhaps you're mad that you finished behind us in the polls again?
Perhaps you're mad that you finished behind us in the polls again?
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:05 pm to Gradual_Stroke
quote:
Wait, I thought it was OUR defense that sucked?
That's a punt return, your defense still has that title on lock...
quote:
That was horrifying
That was just Ace being Ace.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:07 pm to theGarnetWay
quote:
Perhaps you're mad that you finished behind us in the polls again?
this is all I can come to as well
we were ranked 21st when we played their 5th ranked team with 4 weeks left in the season and still managed to finish ahead of them and play in a better bowl game
I guess that would drive anyone mad
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:08 pm to theGarnetWay
Who cares about the polls? I guess SC fans.
You had a solid year. No doubt. Mizzou had a slightly better year. No debate.
I'm actually surprised that you haven't considered something else as the reason I start these threads.
You had a solid year. No doubt. Mizzou had a slightly better year. No debate.
I'm actually surprised that you haven't considered something else as the reason I start these threads.
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:16 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
mizzoukills
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Warfarer
quote:
I don't know anything about Mizzo except it is far away and you got your arse handed to you last year when it counted and I was watching. I've been to South Carolina and looks like I will be going up for a wedding later this year and it is a beautiful area and I have met a lot of good people in Columbia.
You know nothing about Mizzou or Missouri, yet you believe you can form an opinion about the people in Missouri and our scenery?
Wow. Your post couldn't sound more uneducated.
Derp.
(by the way, in the past 7 years Mizzou has had two 12 win seasons and two 10 win seasons. Crazy, huh?)
I don't know so much about 7 years either...but 20 posts a day every day for almost three fricking years is damn impressive. For having a mediocre-at-best football program, you guys can run up post counts with the best of them. Awesome stamina, man. Solid.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:18 pm to BamaGradinTn
no need for blue little pills
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:19 pm to mizzoukills
quote:
South Carolina has been a solid above average program since 2010, correct?
Mizzou board
This post was edited on 5/29/14 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:26 pm to mizzoukills
quote:It would have been interesting to see if y'all would have landed in Cotton bowl still had y'all not lost to us. Perhaps Mizzou would have been chosen to represent tSEC in the Sugar bowl over Bama.
Like I said, even if we won that game we would've accomplished the same thing: SEC East Champions and appearance in SEC Championship game.
quote:Mizzou was trying to accomplish winning that game, and y'all didn't do that. We were the better team last year. Y'all lost to a team that lost to Tennessee, ouch.
However, the outcome of that game didn't matter. Mizzou accomplished what it needed to regardless of that game.
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:28 pm to mizzoukills
quote:I would rather be in South Carolina's position post-Spurrier than Mizzou's post-Pinkel. Y'all are fricked when Pinkel hangs it up.
You may wonder where I'm going with this. I keep reading on the rant that after Spurrier leaves, South Carolina will surely hire a superstar coach because people across this country now see the "potential" of the South Carolina program.
So, let me get this straight...above average success for 4 years now translates to incredible future potential? 4 years of solid but unremarkable performance all of the sudden makes SCar a destination program?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:32 pm to CockRocket
quote:
I would rather be in South Carolina's position post-Spurrier than Mizzou's post-Pinkel. Y'all are fricked when Pinkel hangs it up.
Please tell me why South Carolina will be in a better position post Spurrier than Mizzou post Pinkel...
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:37 pm to mizzoukills
It's simple really. Mizzou can't recruit, sell itself, for shite. PINKEL is the magic worker that takes the 3* and turns them into 3rd rounders. You, like all mizzou fans, think Mizzou is some great program so why can't y'all recruit better? Is it the inconsistency (12 win seasons followed by missing a bowl)?
I've heard many times that Pinkel is the best at doing more with less and "finding diamonds in the rough", y'all seem to pride yourselves on saying that. But after he leaves, who is going to coach all these 'underrated' guys up to SEC level?
I've heard many times that Pinkel is the best at doing more with less and "finding diamonds in the rough", y'all seem to pride yourselves on saying that. But after he leaves, who is going to coach all these 'underrated' guys up to SEC level?
Posted on 5/29/14 at 12:41 pm to Loathor
Holy frick.
I see the gang bang at CNB's house is now over. Everyone of you show up at the same time.
I see the gang bang at CNB's house is now over. Everyone of you show up at the same time.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News