Started By
Message

re: Since Bama is now Horrible... are they now a W lock on your sched?

Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:16 am to
Posted by DaBama
Helena, AL
Member since Oct 2011
1629 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:16 am to
quote:

I think we throw for over 400.



In a losing effort.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

I had bama marked down as a win over AU before the season started. That hasn't changed.
Posted by REBEL5 AC
Member since Sep 2012
14691 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:18 am to
Nice melt.

I will say that Bama could field a team of 12 year old girls and I still would never be 100% certain of a W against y'all.

Do I have a small shiver of hope for a W this year? Not going to lie, yeah...but I'm not sure I will ever expect to beat Bama.
Posted by MenloDawg
Member since Jan 2010
6719 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:19 am to
I would say we would definitely beat you in the SECCG, but I don't think you're good enough to make it.
Posted by BamaStepL
Ttown
Member since Feb 2011
2334 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Aggie Fishfinder


quote:

I think we throw for over 400.


That may very well happen... But you won't be able to stop us... our ball control offense is going to wear your defense down and limit your possessions.
Posted by Politiceaux
Member since Feb 2009
17654 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:19 am to
There's that classic gump insecurity
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:21 am to
Yes! Auburn has owned the city of Tuscaloosa for parts of 3 different centuries anyway. Alabama might as well go ahead and forfeit the game now
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:22 am to
But Alabama has won four of six. So we good.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:24 am to




thread blows
Posted by auburnphan23
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

this defense is still a top 10 calibre defense it'll likely end up #1 in the conference for the 7th time in a row...

If this happens, it will at least partially be because you have played the easiest or one of the easiest SEC schedules for the 7th year in a row
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:30 am to
Lol. Yep. Alabama is only 80-15 since the beginning of the 2008 season because of the schedule.
Posted by 615tider
sidewalk in TN
Member since Oct 2012
3349 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:30 am to
quote:

If this happens, it will at least partially be because you have played the easiest or one of the easiest SEC schedules for the 7th year in a row


No way, have you forgotten that UT beat Utah State last week? They are back.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30597 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:37 am to
quote:

this happens, it will at least partially be because you have played the easiest or one of the easiest SEC schedules for the 7th year in a row
How can you, with a straight face, say that any team that has to play every SEC west division team has the easiest schedule?...that's one stupid-arse statement.
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Lol. Yep. Alabama is only 80-15 since the beginning of the 2008 season because of the schedule.


The schedule for Bama has set up the last four year where they only played two good teams each year in the regular season.

2010- LSU, AU
2011- LSU, Ark
2012- LSU, A&M
2013- AU, A&M-?

They played .500 agaisnt those teams and still were allowed to play in two BSCNCG.
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:39 am to
Wow. Discrediting nearly a decade of dominance with the old "schedule argument".
Posted by Irons Puppet
Birmingham
Member since Jun 2009
25901 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Wow. Discrediting nearly a decade of dominance with the old "schedule argument


The schedule is what it is. I do not see anyone arguing against its difficulty. What other team has recieved a "Mulligan" to the BCSNCG with two home November loses ?
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:47 am to
2011 is what it is. But who the hell else was going to go in 2012? We beat #3 Georgia in the SEC title game. The better argument is Notre Dame shouldn't have been there.
Posted by Mizzou to my Lou
Miami
Member since Sep 2013
1767 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

You're measuring Bama's defense against other Bama defenses


Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I'm not seeing this over night changing of the guards...



You do realize that Bama is NOT defending SEC champions, right?
Posted by CapstoneGrad06
Little Rock
Member since Nov 2008
72175 posts
Posted on 9/3/14 at 10:50 am to
Well if you measure any defense of the last 25 years (save for 2001 Miami) against the 2011 version, it's going to come up short. Every starter is in the NFL and it held opponents to 188 YPG.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter