Started By
Message
re: Since '80, what dynasty comes in 2nd place behind the current Alabama dynasty?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:30 pm to rolltide1283
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:30 pm to rolltide1283
quote:
It takes skill and luck to get in the NC game! I'd say 3 total losses in 3 years is outstanding in this conf!
Well the last three years bama hasn't played the 1st,2nd , or 3rd placed team from the east.
1
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:32 pm to stevo1905
quote:
You are the epitome of a rantard.
Nothing I said is an opinion. The NCAA( which is what our teams play ) DOES NOT recognize te bcs winner as the NCAA champ. Fact. They do recognize conference champs.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:34 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Y'all just can't stand to give credit where it's due! Who in this conf can say they've won 10 or more games for 6 straight years?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:37 pm to Rickdaddy4188
We still won our games and dominated most of our opponents! We played tougher opponents than most teams in other conferences!
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:54 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Mid '90s Nebraska is easily #1. 2009-2012 Bama had more than twice as many losses as 1994-1997 Nebraska. I hate to say it but Nebraska was on another level.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:55 pm to memphisplaya
quote:
You mean like your last two NC's?
There was only one "Year of the Upset" during the BCS era. The 2011 and 2012 regular seasons weren't ridiculous.
It's tough to go undefeated. How far back do you have to go to find another 2+ loss national champion? You needed far more help than 2012 Alabama needed.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:57 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
LSU 2003-2007
2 National titles
3 SEC West titles
2 SEC Titles
3-0 in BCS games
This.
And 2 different coaches.
FSU is top 3 for sure. They were at the pinnacle of college football for well over a decade.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 6:59 pm to UMRealist
I stared. ,dammit
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:01 pm to Tammany Tom
quote:
LSU 2003-2007
No not a dynasty in any way, shape or form. Bama's is definitely a dynasty. 3 Natty's in 4 years is legit. You can't go three years in between champions and be consider a dynasty. Were the late 2000s Steelers a dynasty? No. But the early 2000s Patriots were definitely a dynasty.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:03 pm to soleckma
quote:
Nothing I said is an opinion. The NCAA( which is what our teams play ) DOES NOT recognize te bcs winner as the NCAA champ. Fact. They do recognize conference champs.
LSU fans are just buttehurt about losing to bama year after year recently and the one time they beat them they get whooped in the natty by the same team.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:05 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
Bama has lost to its highest rated opponent 4 years in a row.
I'm pretty sure 2012 LSU was ranked higher than 2012 Texas A&M before and after the Alabama game last season.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:05 pm to craigbiggio
quote:
LSU 2003-2007 2 National titles 3 SEC West titles 2 SEC Titles 3-0 in BCS games
This is probably a joke but if you mean this, Auburn can make the same claim as they also have 2 SEC and BCS titles in a smaller timeframe under two different head coaches. I wouldn't of course, because it's totally ridiculous.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 7:06 pm
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:09 pm to soleckma
quote:
LSU fans are just buttehurt about losing to bama year after year recently
Lsu has beaten bama 9 times in the last 13 years.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:11 pm to Gardevoir
quote:
I'm pretty sure 2012 LSU was ranked higher than 2012 Texas A&M before and after the Alabama game last season.
I'm talking about final rankings. In the regular season , bama has lost to its highest ranked opponent for four straight years.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:13 pm to Dr Lecter
Does this include Alabama games against such powerhouses like ULM and Utah?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:22 pm to stevo1905
quote:
Auburn can make the same claim as they also have 2 SEC and BCS titles
Getting a little ahead of yourself huh?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:30 pm to Dr Lecter
Well Nebraska 04-07 was better sooo....
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:32 pm to Rickdaddy4188
quote:
In the regular season , bama has lost to its highest ranked opponent for four straight years.
That's true; however, you must consider that those teams retained those high rankings because they beat Alabama. Where would 2012 Texas A&M and 2013 Auburn have ranked if they'd both lost to Alabama?
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:35 pm to rolltide1283
quote:
Y'all just can't stand to give credit where it's due! Who in this conf can say they've won 10 or more games for 6 straight years?
Florida in the 90s. They also won 5 out of 6 SEC titles.
Posted on 12/15/13 at 7:35 pm to Dr Lecter
quote:
2. Early 2000's USC (cheated, but, still deserve 2nd spot)
3. Mid 90's Nesbraska (disputed NCs lower them)
I chose '80 since most here seem to be less than 35 years old and have not had the privilege of seeing the greatest football program of all time in their previous dynasty years.
Page 3 of 10
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News