Started By
Message
re: SI: Why Alabama, Not Oklahoma, Should be #1
Posted on 5/25/11 at 8:38 pm to Teague
Posted on 5/25/11 at 8:38 pm to Teague
quote:
And how many teams are going to score 17 points on Bama?
EVERY team has questions and none of them are clearly more talented than Bama and have less questions.
I promise you, someone will score more than 17 on Bama. So let me get this straight... You're for sure that Bama is going to go undefeated this year? They're going to beat PSU, LSU, MSU, Arky, Auburn,etc... ? Because that's what you'll have to do to even play OU. The big 12 will be so bad next year it not even a guess that the sooners will come out without a loss. Between the two teams, OU has a better shot at going undefeated. That's why they're number 1
0
Posted on 5/25/11 at 8:41 pm to Monticello
quote:
Mos likely odds to appear in the title game? Sure, that is OU all the way. I have always felt that the ranking should reflect the best team though and not just the one most likely to be at #1 at season's end.
I agree. But its a business. At the end of the season everyone is going to compare preseason polls to the final polls. Whichever publication gets the closest get a good reputation for preseason polls.
Posted on 5/25/11 at 8:53 pm to jledet
quote:
I asked this, all that talent coming back barely beat uconn
???????
Seriously????
48-20 is barely beating someone?
Page 5 of 5
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News