Started By
Message
re: Should the SEC reconsider bowl money payouts?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:49 am to UFownstSECsince1950
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:49 am to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:Check the current NCAA academic rankings, dumbass.
Vandy helps bump up our conference academics, since the inbred gump dummies do nothing but bring that shite down.
0
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:50 am to GIbson05
Alabama would be worthless without the SEC, just remember that.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:50 am to GIbson05
If it ain't broke, break it.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:50 am to GIbson05
quote:
So is it fair teams like Vandy and Kentucky who bring nothing in get the same money as Alabama and Miss State?
Jeez, UAT....was killing UAB football not enough?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:50 am to GIbson05
No. The better solution is to shave off the non-productive schools if it truly becomes an issue. If we can really go team by team and identify some that don't produce, even over time, then that's the route I'd prefer.
Honestly the only really non-productive school is Vanderbilt, and they happen to be the only high end academic school in the conference. Others who don't regularly bring in big cash, MSU and Ole Miss, for example, are still credible opponents who bolster the success of bigger schools, and obviously landmass was a true player this season.
Honestly the only really non-productive school is Vanderbilt, and they happen to be the only high end academic school in the conference. Others who don't regularly bring in big cash, MSU and Ole Miss, for example, are still credible opponents who bolster the success of bigger schools, and obviously landmass was a true player this season.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:51 am to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
Vandy helps bump up our conference academics,
So is Alabama a better school now because Vandy is in the same conference?
It doesn't compare. If other schools dont get a benefit academically, why do we have to share equally bowl payouts.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:52 am to DarthRebel
quote:
Alabama would be worthless without the SEC, just remember that.
Considering Alabama built the SEC I think we will be fine.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:52 am to bobsacamano
quote:
Didn't Texas try something like this with the Big12?
Texas does not "try something" in the Big 12. They do whatever they want.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:54 am to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
I'm not suggesting teams keep everything they bring in and teams that dont make bowls get nothing.
I just think the teams bringing in more should get to keep a higher percentage of the money they bring in that year.
I just think the teams bringing in more should get to keep a higher percentage of the money they bring in that year.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:55 am to UFownstSECsince1950
quote:
UK brings in money & notoriety in bball that you Gumps could never produce.
You do realize that Alabama is the second winningest SEC team in basketball right?
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:55 am to DarthRebel
quote:fify
Mississippi would be worthless without the SEC, just remember that.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:57 am to Tiger n Miami AU83
quote:
frick bama
And a good morning to you too friend.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:57 am to TeeteringBrink
quote:
If it ain't broke, break it.
Well said
Posted on 12/22/14 at 8:57 am to DarthRebel
quote:
Alabama would be worthless without the SEC, just remember that.
Bama would be just fine....we could go the Notre Dame route if we had to....the rst of you scrubs would make a fine addition to Conference USA.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:00 am to WhiskerBiscuitSlayer
quote:
Texas does not "try something" in the Big 12. They do whatever they want.
We kind of did too with that guaranteed money to us, OU, and tu for TV even if we were not picked by ABC & ESPN enough.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:03 am to TideSaint
quote:
You do realize that Alabama is the second winningest SEC team in basketball right?
And that does what on the basketball end for revenue right now? Kentucky produces about $8 million after expenditures and was a cornerstone of the SEC Network going forward.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:07 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Bama would be just fine....we could go the Notre Dame route if we had to....the rst of you scrubs would make a fine addition to Conference USA.
Is Notre Dame really what Bama wants to be in todays CFB financial climate? Seems like an ignorant statement to me.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:10 am to Tigerman97
Bama look at Texas, BYU or N.Dame for your model if you think you built anything on your own... yes you are the leader, but you are not the only reason the SEC was successful...
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:11 am to GIbson05
quote:
So is Alabama a better school now because Vandy is in the same conference?
Maybe, maybe not. However, I'm pretty sure vandy's membership in the conference protects the SEC from FOIA requests.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:12 am to Tigerman97
quote:
Is Notre Dame really what Bama wants to be in todays CFB financial climate? Seems like an ignorant statement to me.
Difference is the SEC wouldn't put up with the floundering bullshite that the Big East and ACC does out of Notre Dame and would force them independent across the board. Good luck with that.
Page 2 of 6
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News