Started By
Message
re: Should Alabama trade Tennessee for Vandy as its east rival
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:29 pm to thatdude1985
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:29 pm to thatdude1985
quote:
The frick does that have to do with the OP?
Bama is in need of a non-threatening rival that will never get back up and punch them in the face.
The fear of #decline is strong in Bammers.
1
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:49 pm to BigOrangeBri
No one is impressed with Tennessee's class.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:50 pm to northalabamacracker
Not yet, I'm still not over all those beatings they gave us before Saban.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:50 pm to northalabamacracker
There shouldn't be permanent cross division opponents
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:51 pm to Prof
We have a nonthreatening rival in Tennersee. Hence the op.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:52 pm to northalabamacracker
quote:
No one is impressed with Tennessee's class.
I'm pretty sure we have more 4* than anyone in the country.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:53 pm to northalabamacracker
Good try, good effort OP.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:55 pm to NorthGAVol
4*
Posted on 1/4/14 at 7:57 pm to northalabamacracker
Can we have Tennessee?
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:01 pm to SwayzeBalla
Yes you can........next year.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:04 pm to Prof
quote:
You missed that Iron Bowl beatdown?
Losing by 6 isn't a beatdown.
Now
45-10
44-13
37-6
41-10
those are beatdowns.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:09 pm to Cockopotamus
quote:
There shouldn't be permanent cross division opponents
Well then move us (and Auburn) to the East and put Kentucky or Vanderbilt and Missouri in the West.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:15 pm to Carolina Tide
Auburn's back CT. As much as you might not want to admit it they're back.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:19 pm to Prof
Back? They won the BCS in 2010. I don't know if one bad year under Eugene means they really left. UT on the other hand...
That's why I say we should upgrade our schedule by playing the best team from Tennessee.
That's why I say we should upgrade our schedule by playing the best team from Tennessee.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:22 pm to northalabamacracker
Sure you mean 'upgrade.' Because Bama is so well known for tough OOC opponents that they want to 'upgrade' conference play too.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 8:51 pm to Prof
I agree. Vandy would be an upgrade. Hence the op.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:12 pm to northalabamacracker
Alabama should replace both LSU and UT on the permanent schedule. They need competition, other than Auburn.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:28 pm to northalabamacracker
Bwahahahahahaha - good one!
Posted on 1/4/14 at 9:38 pm to Scoreboard
quote:
Bwahahahahahaha - good one!
No doubt. The fact that he kept a straight face is impressive.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 10:02 pm to Prof
Well, last 2 years (and probably 3), Vandy-Alabama would certainly have been a better game than Alabama-UT. Is there any doubt about that? As for the future, well, it will likely alternate with Vandy-UT becoming more competitive.
ETA: No, I'm not for ruining the TSIO because it's been a historically significant game in the SEC. I just think the point that Vandy would have been more of a challenge lately is factual.
ETA: No, I'm not for ruining the TSIO because it's been a historically significant game in the SEC. I just think the point that Vandy would have been more of a challenge lately is factual.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 10:09 pm
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News