Started By
Message
re: SECW on a 5 year win streak against the SECE.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:32 pm to parkjas2001
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:32 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Any duo where half is not coming off major knee surgery is better.
This is mind-numbingly retarded. You're better than that, park
1
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:32 pm to WG_Dawg
Guess Ill just have to take your medical knowledge at heart since Im better that this.
Like I said, I did not realize that Marshall is back to 100% form. Since he is, then yes they are the top duo.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:32 pm to Loathor
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:33 pm to parkjas2001
got dammit park what's your deal. Marshall isn't 100% right now, but lucky for us it's still 4.5 more fricking months until game time.
And you STILL have yet to throw out any other options.
And you STILL have yet to throw out any other options.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:34 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:Well if you got time go make a list. I'm not. You can just explain why a team that lost to Mizzou 41-26 is suddenly better than them if you take a way the player that scored 21 of their points. AM is way important to UGA than DGB is to Mizzou.
I've got time...why don't you go top to bottom and compare both teams. They aren't better than us.
quote:Well a player sitting on the bench for multiple games is an issue. You can't say it won't happen this year.
Sorry an LSU player rolling the frick out of his ankle kept him out a few games. Has nothing do to with "staying healthy"...the most healthy player in the world would have sat after that injury as well. Marshall got blindsided in the back of the knee...again, nothing to do with "being healthy".
quote:Its comparable. TR got a NC but that doesn't mean he was the reason the team won it. Talent, teams faced, and how good the offense is can make their job alot easier and make them even look better than they are sometimes.
And was fired a year later before heading to UCF Not exactly comparable.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 2:35 pm
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:35 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
Like I said, I did not realize that Marshall is back to 100% form. Since he is, then yes they are the top duo.
Fine, I'll humor you and take Marshall out of the equation. Gurley + Chubb and/or Michel = best RB duo in the SEC
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:36 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
What the frick are you talking about?
It's pretty obvious what he is talking about. You responded to his opinion that UGA will have the best RB tandem this season with a
without any text. That's not a good post and you know this. When asked if UGA as the best tandem is so laughable, then who, you said any team with a duo that doesn't include someone coming off knee surgery would be better. There are probably a couple of dozen to almost every team in the country that fit that description depending on how you interpret it. So you basically said most teams in the country have a better tandem. Still not actually naming any teams. Then you deflected into some semantic argument about best right now instead of best for the 2014 season, which is clearly what everyone in the thread is discussing.Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:36 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Marshall isn't 100% right now
I konw, which is why its funny in April to assume that he will return to form already.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:36 pm to Rabern57
quote:
Well if you got time go make a list. I'm not. You can just explain why a team that lost to Mizzou 41-26 is suddenly better than them if you take a way the player that scored 21 of their points. AM is way important to UGA than DGB is to Mizzou.
Did you even watch that game/pay attention to UGA's situation at the time?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:40 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
This is mind-numbingly retarded.
While that was bad, no...this is mind-numbing:
quote:
Well if you got time go make a list. I'm not. You can just explain why a team that lost to Mizzou 41-26 is suddenly better than them if you take a way the player that scored 21 of their points. AM is way important to UGA than DGB is to Mizzou.
Well a player sitting on the bench for multiple games is an issue. You can't say it won't happen this year.
Its comparable. TR got a NC but that doesn't mean he was the reason the team won it. Talent, teams faced, and how good the offense is can make their job alot easier and make them even look better than they are sometimes.
Trying hard to discredit Pruitt's contribution to their streak-breaking NC game loss.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:40 pm to Rabern57
quote:
Well if you got time go make a list. I'm not.
That's not how it works chief. YOU are the one claiming "top to bottom" missouri is better, as if you are familiar with both teams at every position. But apparently you can't do that, so no...you can't claim that "top to bottom" missouri is better than us.
quote:
You can just explain why a team that lost to Mizzou 41-26
It's been done and done and done again, and it's the same answer now as then. We were without our top 2 RBs and were playing 2 TRUE freshmen, and were without our top 3 WRs and had to play 2 WALKONS. Yet, it was still a 1 possession game with like 5 minutes left. Oh, and statistically we had the worst UGA defense in school history, while Missouri had one of their best seasons ever. I can just as easily point to reasons why we will be better than missouri this year as you can say "well you lost murray!!". That's basically all you can point to.
quote:
Well a player sitting on the bench for multiple games is an issue. You can't say it won't happen this year.
Well your whole team's plane could go down in a fiery crash. Will it? Doubtful, but you can't say it won't.
quote:
Its comparable
Roof won a title because one of the 4or 5 best players in the entire history of the SEC singlehandedly won them about half their games. Defense, pass defense in particular, was a very weak spot on that team. And he was fired. And then went to a MUCH lesser job.
Pruitt has continued to be on the rise everywhere he's gone in a VERY short amount of time and just had an extremely stout defense.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:43 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:I watched it off and on but I also watched UGA and Missouri throughout the season and I saw nothing to make me think UGA without AM is going to be better than Missouri this year. None of the preseason polls seem to think so either. AM alone is enough to knock to UGA to 3 or 4th in the East, even with TG healthy.
Did you even watch that game/pay attention to UGA's situation at the time?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:44 pm to Rabern57
quote:
None of the preseason polls seem to think so either.
Go ahead and link us the preseason polls you're referring to so we can all be on the same page. Thanks.
quote:
AM alone is enough to knock to UGA to 3 or 4th in the East, even with TG healthy
This is so retarded I will not justify it with an actual response.
This post was edited on 4/14/14 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:46 pm to Rabern57
quote:
I watched it off and on but I also watched UGA and Missouri throughout the season and I saw nothing to make me think UGA without AM is going to be better than Missouri this year. None of the preseason polls seem to think so either. AM alone is enough to knock to UGA to 3 or 4th in the East, even with TG healthy.
I think every preseason poll I've seen has UGA higher than Missouri. It's not just about Gurley either. There's also Mitchell, Bennett, JSW, Conley, Marshall, and Rome who missed multiple games last year.
It's pretty evident you just don't know shite about UGA's team.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:47 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
It's pretty evident you just don't know shite about UGA's team.
It's painfully obvious, yet somehow he thinks we should listen to him. Apparently an auburn fan knows as much about missouri and UGA as our fans do.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:48 pm to Rabern57
quote:
I saw nothing to make me think UGA without AM is going to be better than Missouri this year. None of the preseason polls seem to think so either.
What preseason polls are you talking about?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:49 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
None of the preseason polls
quote:
I think every preseason poll I've seen
What polls?
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:51 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
What polls?
The ESPN "way too early" polls or whatever they're called.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:51 pm to Crowknowsbest
Those things are "way too early" for a reason.
Posted on 4/14/14 at 2:52 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
The ESPN "way too early" polls or whatever they're called.
He's going to inform you those aren't technically "polls."
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News