Started By
Message

re: SEC Teams Ranked by Winning % the Last 40, 50, and 60 Years

Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Wrong.

Texas has 26 SWC championships. (2 after we left)
Arkansas has 13 SWC Championships.
Texas A&M has 16 SWC championships (3 after we left)
TCU has 10 SWC Championships (1 after we left)
SMU has 11 SWC championsihps.
Rice had 7.
Baylor had 5.
Houston had 4 in their brief time in the league
Texas Tech had 2.


i know. i admitted my error. I got sidetracked at work and was looking at the wrong page.
Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

bama ruled the SEC in the 70's but it was pretty even before and afterwards.


Meh.

Tennessee pretty much disappeared from 1969 - 1985; Georgia went from powerhouse to shithouse several times; LSU disappeared, reappeared, disappeared, reappeared; and Auburn came on starting with Pat Dye, disappeared, and came back last year.

Florida came on in 1990 and has never really gone away.

But Alabama has been the only real constant.

This post was edited on 6/20/11 at 2:44 pm
Posted by DaleDenton
Member since Jun 2010
42394 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:49 pm to
quote:


Meh.

Tennessee pretty much disappeared from 1969 - 1985; Georgia went from powerhouse to shithouse several times; LSU disappeared, reappeared, disappeared, reappeared; and Auburn came on starting with Pat Dye, disappeared, and came back last year.

Florida came on in 1990 and has never really gone away.

But Alabama has been the only real constant.


This is my point, Texas and Arkansas were both "constants" as far as the national stage with a down year every now and then. Texas A&M, Houston, and SMU would pop up every now and then depending on how their salary caps were going that year.

In the Big 8 you had Nebraska and OU.

Pac-10 you had USC/UCLA.

Big10, Ohio St. and Michigan.

It is laughable to compare the parity to the leagues today to the leagues of the 50s-90s as this type of parity did not exist in leagues that were good, so to say one league was harder or easier top to bottom than another is laughable as just about every league was a one to two horse league at the time...
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

This is my point, Texas and Arkansas were both "constants" as far as the national stage with a down year every now and then. Texas A&M, Houston, and SMU would pop up every now and then depending on how their salary caps were going that year.


I would say you and A&M were pretty even.
Posted by hogminer
Bella Vista, AR.
Member since Apr 2010
9682 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

bama ruled the SEC in the 70's but it was pretty even before and afterwards.


Bama ruled in the 60's as much as the 70's.
LSU was far and away the 2nd best team in the SEC during that period but Bama in the 60's was just as dominant nationally as the 70's.

Posted by smelvis
Member since Nov 2010
2107 posts
Posted on 6/20/11 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

LSU was far and away the 2nd best team in the SEC during that period but Bama in the 60's was just as dominant nationally as the 70's.


The '60's were more decent from a parity standpoint in the SEC. Bama ruled the decade, but Ole Miss and Georgia each won a couple of SECC's, LSU won one, and so did Tennessee.

The '70's?

Domination, other than LSU in '70, Georgia in '76, and Kentucky in '77.


Page 1 2 3 4
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter