Started By
Message
re: SEC Series Records going into 2014
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:37 am to Hugh McElroy
Posted on 5/30/14 at 1:37 am to Hugh McElroy
quote:
(You didn't give A&M credit for USC)
Looks like he also mis-counted Auburn's totals.
0
Posted on 5/30/14 at 2:48 am to TTsTowel
LSU has owned Auburn even when they were so called decent, get real!!! 
Posted on 5/30/14 at 3:42 am to DaleDenton
Those numbers take into account Alabama having vacated/forfeited wins against about many SEC opponents.
Doesn't matter of course.
Doesn't matter of course.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 3:52 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Vandy:
Auburn 21-20-1
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 3:52 am
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:32 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Surely that's a misprint. Every UF fan I know thinks they've always dominated the series.
In their lifetime maybe...UGA has had a huge head start, but we've been working on closing that gap.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:35 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Ole Miss vs:
SCAR 8-7
Sucks we won't get to play OM but once a decade and correct this wrong. Or whatever the hell the new format is.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:35 am to KajunGator
quote:
UGA has had a huge head start
quote:
but we've been working on closing that gap.
Having the greatest coach in school history (and top 5 or 6ish in SEC history) coach for a decade against one of our worst and a guy who was average as grits will certainly do that.
Richt has now worked on lengthening it back again.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:37 am to DaleDenton
quote:
SCAR 17-2-1
I figured it was lopsided, but damn.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:49 am to KajunGator
quote:
we've been working on closing that gap.
Looks like y'all had closed the gap with Mississippi, but then fell back behind.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 9:53 am to theGarnetWay
quote:
Sucks we won't get to play OM but once a decade and correct this wrong. Or whatever the hell the new format is.
What I found interesting was how Arkansas and Carolina had played some original 10 members more often in the years before their entrance into the conference than the 10 had played each other.
Also looks like Ms. State, Kentucky, and Vandy were the popular whipping boys for the rest of the conference over the years while some "big6" members were afraid to play each other on a frequent basis back then.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:17 am to Roger Klarvin
quote:
Vandy:
Auburn 21-20-1
Jesus auburn.... Embarrassing
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:23 am to DaleDenton
quote:
Tennessee vs:
LSU 20-9-3
So we can't even tie this one up till almost 2080.... Cool
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:31 am to GeauxPack81
quote:
So we can't even tie this one up till almost 2080.... Cool
Barring SECCGs....I have been to 4 of the 9 LSU wins.
This post was edited on 5/30/14 at 10:31 am
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:33 am to DaleDenton
So LSU has a winning record against everyone but Florida, Alabama, and Tennessee?
Not bad.
Not counting Missouri. We haven't played them.
Not bad.
Not counting Missouri. We haven't played them.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:38 am to DaleDenton
quote:
What I found interesting was how Arkansas and Carolina had played some original 10 members more often in the years before their entrance into the conference than the 10 had played each other.
Just prior to expansion in '92, LSU had played...
Team, #games, win%
State 82 (.579)
Miss 75 (.600)
Bama 53 (.292)
A&M 44 (.625)
KY 42 (.750)
UF 38 (.513)
Arky 36 (.639)
Vandy 24 (.688)
Auburn 24 (.646)
Tenn 22 (.205)
UGA 20 (.625)
USC 13 (.923)
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:42 am to BayouBengals03
quote:
So LSU has a winning record against everyone but Florida, Alabama, and Tennessee?
Prior to expansion in '92, LSU had a winning record vs erybody (including Arky and USC) except Bama and UT.
Posted on 5/30/14 at 10:56 am to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
Georgia vs:
Florida 49-40-2
quote:
Surely that's a misprint. Every UF fan I know thinks they've always dominated the series.
I know you're being facetious, but that actually is a misprint. The correct record is 50-40-2.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News