Started By
Message

re: Saban the Traditionalist

Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by danfraz
San Antonio TX
Member since Apr 2008
24550 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:32 pm to
He has always talked out of both sides of his mouth

Nothing new
Posted by DocEllis
Member since Jun 2013
340 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:33 pm to
Go down what road? thats not my opinion; it's objective fact. And we don't know where it stops, but the argument that it "should just stay the same, because the fans love football" is likely not going to hold much water in light of recent medical revelations about the longterm effect football has on players. And the nfl and the ncaa recognize this. And while concussions are the main focus, as you point out,, the lawsuits are not "about concussions" so much as they are about providing an acceptable level of medical care to active and retired players, which could conceivably be astronomically expensive, enough to change the game we all love in some profound ways.

Again, I'm not arguing for changing anything. Just posting some observations about the larger trends in the game of football. Those lawsuits, and the medical revelations which have led to them, have everything to do with it.

You can surely see why an en vogue style of play whose stated philosophy is to extend the number of plays in a game might not square with this, right?
This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 3:36 pm
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52682 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Funny, he never whined so much when he was at LSU.

Maybe Bama's fan base is rubbing off on him - I understand they like to do that to people.



Hilariously ironic.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I don't like 72-68 games.

Bama currently averages 64, are those 4-8 plays that horrendous?
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I don't like 72-68 games.
To pretend this is the norm of HUNH is silly.

quote:

The HUNH just tries to cheap shot the defense before they're ready.
Not really. They use strategy to say our 11 can play faster and outlast your 11. We can be more organized and better than your response can be.

quote:

I like football as a play-by-play game of chess and skill.
Me too. That is why the HUNH is interesting to me.

quote:

The HUNH takes some of that away (when it works).
I disagree, it just alters what skills are more valued. It is a different chess strategy than what has been traditional. However, what is now the traditional form of football that you enjoy was innovative at one time too.

I'm ok with people preferring one strategy over another. It makes sense. Let us just not pretend the issue is really about player safety
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

DocEllis


are you in favor of banning Blitzing? would stop far more injuries than the HUNH
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70900 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:37 pm to
You took that hook
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:37 pm to
YUP BAMA 42 MALZHAN'S OFFENSE 0.



YUP
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:38 pm to
Very intelligent and accurate post.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

YUP BAMA 42 MALZHAN'S OFFENSE 0. YUP


so much fail


Posted by DocEllis
Member since Jun 2013
340 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:42 pm to
I already said I'm not arguing to change anything. But first of all, it is highly questionable whether what you've said is true, but if the data showed that it was, I could certainly see it becoming restricted in some ways, just like I could see the game shortened in the way we're discussing in this thread.

The threat of player safety issues changing the game is real. I understand why you're defensive on this particular issue given the system AU runs but it is naive to ignore this fact. The status quo is unlikely to remain unchanged, as we've already started to see.
Posted by JB Bama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Sep 2008
2669 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:42 pm to
Bookmarking this thread.

You HUNH proponents arguing that it's within the rules so it's fine and it's a part of the game better not start bitching when more and more minor injuries start occuring on big 3rd downs. It's just a strategic move by the defense to counter the Hurry up.


Personally I love the HUNH, and I love the fact that legally you can spend years perfecting it and I can just tell my 5th best lineman to go in there for 2 plays until his ankle cramps up and get us time to adjust our defense.

If we don't want you to run 90 plays a game we can stop it.
This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 3:44 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:44 pm to
So you think faking an injury is a part of football in the same way not huddling is a part of football?
Posted by AUtigerNOLA
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2011
17107 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

I mean I guess I shouldn't be surprised that Auburn and Ole Miss people are all about this. It's the only way they can compete.


obvious troll. Have a short memory dont you? I forgot that football started for LSU post 90s for you. AU never was competive with a stingy defense?
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:46 pm to
Everyone raised hell when teams went from the wishbone/option to the pro style as well. "Those Miami thugs down there are playing pussy ghetto football." "Just throwing the ball up in the air every play to see who is fastest."

I would bet over time Malzahn dials back the hurry up concept a little bit once he realizes his defense can't stay on the field 40 minutes a game. His actual play calling style is mostly power runs up the middle, which works great. I highly doubt he will play HUNH all game every game though. Going from an OC to a HC is like going from a senator to a President. You begin to realize that a lot of the things you wanted to do in your old role are not practical in your new role.
Posted by piggidyphish
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2009
18880 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Go down what road


You're making the HUNH issue akin to concussion issue.

I think that confuses the issue and if you start making it about player safety from that level then you're really opening a door for more radical changes.

My point...the player safety issue isn't about concussions. And to try to trump it up as being about that is a weak argument...and if that is your point then why not make a change that could really do something about it, as opposed to griping about HUNH (i'm talking about saban here, not you).
This post was edited on 7/22/13 at 3:48 pm
Posted by JB Bama
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Sep 2008
2669 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

So you think faking an injury is a part of football in the same way not huddling is a part of football?


Not at all, I think there are injuries on just about every play, and I'd tell my guys that we ought to be more careful and if they feel the speed of the game is getting to them and that ankle is starting to hurt then lets get it looked at.

Safety first after all.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

I highly doubt he will play HUNH all game every game though.
He wants to play as fast as possible and get as many plays as possible, but has admitted that he still has to manage the entire game and can't always go fast.

He isn't a dumb guy and a lot will depend on how competent his defense is and if his offense can produce a first down or two. he usually doesn't go into his full hurry up until after a first down.
Posted by NYCAuburn
TD Platinum Membership/SECr Sheriff
Member since Feb 2011
57002 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

But first of all, it is highly questionable whether what you've said is true,


I'd say what I said is more than likely to be true that what you are saying with plays.

look at it like this. one directly results in blindsided, hard, fast hits. whereas the other might have a reaction because of possible fatigue
quote:

I understand why you're defensive on this particular issue given the system AU


has nothing to do with it

quote:

but it is naive to ignore this fact


I think its naïve to take up for everything your coach says as gospel(not personally directed at you)
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54132 posts
Posted on 7/22/13 at 3:50 pm to
So then your answer is yes.
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter