Started By
Message
Saban on transfer rule
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:25 pm
Doesnt sound like hes a fan of it.
"Saban wants more clarity on SEC "serious misconduct" rule. "Cam Newton and Nick Marshall were good for the SEC."
"Saban wants more clarity on SEC "serious misconduct" rule. "Cam Newton and Nick Marshall were good for the SEC."
This post was edited on 6/4/15 at 12:26 pm
23
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:26 pm to AU24
He comes off like a nick in that quote
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:26 pm to AU24
Of course he does.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:26 pm to AU24
quote:
"Saban wants more clarity on SEC "serious misconduct" rule. "Cam Newton and Nick Marshall were good for the SEC."
Actually, he's absolutely right. There needs to be more clarity.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:28 pm to AU24
Would Cam or Marshall's offenses been serious enough to prohibit them from transferring? Seems like there would need to be some sort of violence or serious theft or something.
My guess is both of them would have been able to appeal and go through the review process and transfer to Auburn anyways.
My guess is both of them would have been able to appeal and go through the review process and transfer to Auburn anyways.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:29 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Actually, he's absolutely right. There needs to be more clarity.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:29 pm to AU24
Saban should just make all of the rules.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:29 pm to NFLU
quote:
Saban should just make all of the rules.
Deal
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:30 pm to AU24
Were either of them violent or sexual offenders? No, so they'd be good to go.
Those aren't cases where clarification is needed.
Those aren't cases where clarification is needed.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:30 pm to Vols&Shaft83
tRant: Saban says something that could possibly be misconstrued and twisted:
This post was edited on 6/4/15 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:32 pm to AU24
quote:
"Cam Newton and Nick Marshall were good for the SEC."
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:35 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Actually, he's absolutely right. There needs to be more clarity.
Doesn't the rule already say offenses like domestic violence or sexual offenses are the only things covered right now? Maybe that was just a rumor.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:35 pm to Patton
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:36 pm to Crowknowsbest
quote:
Were either of them violent or sexual offenders? No, so they'd be good to go.
Would Mettenswag have been able to transfer under the rule?
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:36 pm to tungi01
quote:
tRant: Saban says something
20 pages
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:37 pm to NorthGwinnettTiger
quote:
Actually, he's absolutely right. There needs to be more clarity.
Of course he is. People just hate him for his success therefore they have to disagree even when he is right no matter how foolish they come off
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:37 pm to AU24
Well, he's right. I haven't seen anything that constitutes what "serious misconduct" is.
It doesn't effect us because we won't take guys like that anyway, but it will be good that the rest of you can't now either.
It doesn't effect us because we won't take guys like that anyway, but it will be good that the rest of you can't now either.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:37 pm to NGATiger
quote:
Would Mettenswag have been able to transfer under the rule?
no
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:38 pm to AU24
He knows Cam and Marshall wouldn't fall under this rule. What a prick Saban is for even using them.
Now, does it mean the rule doesn't require clarity as he suggests? No it probably does.
Now, does it mean the rule doesn't require clarity as he suggests? No it probably does.
Posted on 6/4/15 at 12:39 pm to ATLdawg25
quote:
Would Cam or Marshall's offenses been serious enough to prohibit them from transferring?
What about Mettenberger?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News