Started By
Message
Response thread: Fewest non-winning seasons by SEC teams since 2000
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:33 am
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:33 am
LSU - 0
UGa - 1 ('10)
FL - 1 ('13)
AU - 2 ('08, '12)
SC - 5 ('02-03, '07, '15-16)
Bama - 6* ('00, '03-07)
Arky - 6 ('00, '04-05, '08, '12-13)
UTee - 6 ('05, '08, '10-13)
OM - 7** ('04-07, '10-11, '16)
MSU - 9 ('01-06, '08-09, '16)
UK - 11 ('00-01, '03-05, '10-15)
VU - 14 ('00-07, '09-11, '14-16)
(* Due to multiple NCAA violations, Bama was winless in '05 and 2-6 in '07, bringing their total non-winning seasons to 6; using on-field records only their total is 4)
(** Pending NCAA review)
UGa - 1 ('10)
FL - 1 ('13)
AU - 2 ('08, '12)
SC - 5 ('02-03, '07, '15-16)
Bama - 6* ('00, '03-07)
Arky - 6 ('00, '04-05, '08, '12-13)
UTee - 6 ('05, '08, '10-13)
OM - 7** ('04-07, '10-11, '16)
MSU - 9 ('01-06, '08-09, '16)
UK - 11 ('00-01, '03-05, '10-15)
VU - 14 ('00-07, '09-11, '14-16)
(* Due to multiple NCAA violations, Bama was winless in '05 and 2-6 in '07, bringing their total non-winning seasons to 6; using on-field records only their total is 4)
(** Pending NCAA review)
11
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:35 am to FearlessFreep
UGA UGA UGA!!!
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:40 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
LSU - 0
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:44 am to hg
Big 1
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:45 am to FearlessFreep
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:10 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
LSU - 0
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:17 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
SU - 0
UGa - 1 ('10)
FL - 1 ('13)
AU - 2 ('08, '12)
SC - 5 ('02-03, '07, '15-16)
Bama - 6* ('00, '03-07)
Big 6
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:26 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
LSU - 0
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:29 am to FearlessFreep
quote:
Response thread:
You're doing it wrong.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:45 pm to FearlessFreep
Posted on 7/18/17 at 3:16 pm to FearlessFreep
Recent Vols:
Posted on 7/18/17 at 3:39 pm to FearlessFreep
I love timelines that start with 2000.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 7:27 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
I love timelines that start with 2000.
Shouldn't even go back that far. What a school did over 20 years ago is irrelevant to the generation that will be enrolling at and playing for these schools this year. They were not even alive then. I bet you no college football player today gives two shits what Bear Bryant did 50 years ago. I bet a lot of them couldn't tell you many facts about it other than he was a coach that won a lot of games.
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 7:34 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 7:32 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
LSU - 0
quote:
LSU - 0
quote:
LSU - 0
Posted on 7/18/17 at 7:41 pm to GameCocky88
quote:
SU - 0
UGa - 1 ('10)
FL - 1 ('13)
AU - 2 ('08, '12)
SC - 5 ('02-03, '07, '15-16)
Bama - 6* ('00, '03-07)
Big 6
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:01 pm to AshLSU
quote:
Shouldn't even go back that far. What a school did over 20 years ago is irrelevant to the generation that will be enrolling at and playing for these schools this year.
I am sure the fact that LSU was horrible in the 1990s is motivation enough not to look back further.
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:26 pm to TigerTalker16
quote:You missed my point.
You're doing it wrong.
What do the two teams at the top of this list (fewest non-winning seasons this milenneim), who are also #2 and #3 in AP Top 10 finishes over the same period also have in common?
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 8:28 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:39 pm to AshLSU
quote:
Shouldn't even go back that far. What a school did over 20 years ago is irrelevant to the generation that will be enrolling at and playing for these schools this year. They were not even alive then. I bet you no college football player today gives two shits what Bear Bryant did 50 years ago. I bet a lot of them couldn't tell you many facts about it other than he was a coach that won a lot of games.
"Why should we care about the Revolutionary War? That happened like a gajillion years ago, none of us were alive! It has no impact on America today."
Actually, history does impact the future. Works for athletics departments the same way it does for countries. Had LSU been more successful prior to Saban's arrival, they'd have a larger national brand. Leads to more fans, more money, higher enrollment, etc. Maybe they could have gotten Tom Herman, who chose instead to attend a historically relevant program that has sucked recently.
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 8:41 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:54 pm to Sampson
quote:
Sampson
quote:
LSU - 0
If that was LSU's score, surely we must also have
quote:
Alabama - 21
yes?
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 8:55 pm
Posted on 7/18/17 at 9:03 pm to AshLSU
quote:
timelines that start with 2000.
quote:
What a school did over 20 years ago
How long ago was 2000 since we're in 2017?
But yeah, going back to when incoming Freshman were just born or maybe a year old is silly. That's purely a fan dick measuring contest, not a real indication of where a program stands currently. And if you're gonna go for historical standing, you might as well go for all of history to get the most context.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News